Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Br Ibrahim john/Archive

Br Ibrahim john

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Kuniácèn, a 3 day old account with less than 10 edits comes back after nearly 2 days to continue the edit warring of Br Ibrahim john on Joseph Kallarangatt [1][2] just hours after Br Ibrahim john was blocked for edit warring by RegentsPark.
Both the accounts have argued that the article "lacks reliable sources" and was "defamatory" within a hour. Apparent defamation lacking WP:RS[3], The article Joseph Kallarangatt had this content which was defamatory and lacking proper reliable sources[4]
Br Ibrahim john makes an unblock request just 22 minutes after the editing session of Kuniácèn in the same article.[5][6]
Both the accounts uses "Advanced mobile edit" from mobile. - SUN EYE 1 09:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Different devices, but the two accounts geolocate to the same area and have the same ISP. Combined with the behavioral similarities, I think this is suspicious enough to block. Blocked and tagged, closing. Mz7 (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Logosx127 account is only a week old, but the editor interaction tool already shows a very substantial amount of overlap in the shared topic area of Christianity in India and the Near East. Logosx127 made an RM/TR request for Malankara-Persian ecclesiastical relations to be moved to Indo-Persian ecclesiastical relations—the same move that Br Ibrahim john made last year. Talk:List of maphrians shows both Logosx127 and Br Ibrahim john carrying on similar arguments with User:Mugsalot. Both are interested in removing honorifics; compare [7] with [8]. There are similar edit summaries, e.g. [9] and [10]. CU will be stale, but it's really difficult to chalk all these behavioral similarities up to coïncidence, in my view. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.