Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BiKaz/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


BiKaz

BiKaz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

19 September 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

On the Barelvi article User:BiKaz was blocked for slow edit-warring. User:777EVIL10 continues the edit war after the block. Similar but more complicated edits to the article on Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi made by BiKaz, 777EVIL10 and an IP. Interestingly the 777EVIL10 ID started his/her edits to Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi before BiKaz's block.

Please can we have a check user. It would come as no surprise if this editor had used other accounts before these ones.

Article on Barelvi BiKaz engaged in a slow edit-war concerning the Barelvi#Criticism section - see [1] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and was blocked for 60 hours at 10:45 on 17 September 2015

  1. 20:16, 6 September 2015 BiKaz reverts User:ScholarM
  2. 22:11, 7 September 2015 BiKaz reverts User:GorgeCustersSabre
  3. 22:25, 8 September 2015 BiKaz reverts User:GorgeCustersSabre
  4. 22:32, 10 September 2015 BiKaz reverts User:ScholarM
  5. 20:09, 16 September 2015 BiKaz reverts User:GorgeCustersSabre
  6. 19:46, 18 September 2015 777EVIL10 reverts User:Alipied
  7. 16:11, 19 September 2015 777EVIL10 reverts User:C.Fred

Article on Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi Edits consist of
(a) Deletes lists of books
(b) Deletes list of works
(c) Adds list of criticisms
(d) Adds statement about "(declaring Kufr) and extremely heretical beliefs" and paragraph about Ehsan Elahi Zaheer's book

  1. 20:43, 14 September 2015 by BiKaz. Has (a), (b) and (c)
  2. 19:57, 16 September 2015 by BiKaz. Has (d)
  3. 20:07, 16 September 2015 by BiKaz. Has (a), (c) and (d)
  4. 19:49, 18 September 2015 by 777EVIL10. Has (a), (c) and (d)
  5. 21:17-21:21, 18 September 2015 by 197.38.238.159. Has (a), (b), (c) and (d)

-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC) Toddy1 (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional revert added to list of diffs.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


22 December 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

TheDestroyer10 and Bikaz and his/her sockpuppets have edited the following pages:

However, I think the most significant evidence for TheDestroyer10 being a sockpuppet of BiKaz is that they both have a similar writing style:

This is what TheDestroyer10 writes in Talk:Mujaddid: "Anyway, this is not the problem here, I can find other sources. PLEASE check the sources of these names: Moinuddin Chishti, Ibn Arabi, Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani. They may be great scholars, but they are not mujaddids" and "As for your question about the failed verification tags, the answer is simply because their sources are FAKE".

The following is what BiKaz writes on the same page but much earlier: "YES, I have RELIABLE sources! :) As for Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni, Moinuddin Chishti & Ibn Arabi: have FAKE sources!"

Not only that they have similar views, but It must be noted that both have the urge to capitalize words in unnecessary situations,e.g. FAKE, PLEASE etc.

Also both are relatively heavily involved in moving pages. For this see their entire editing history. --Peaceworld 11:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]