Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/200.120.158.78/Archive
200.120.158.78
- 200.120.158.78 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
15 June 2014[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Originally blocked for one week on June 5, 2014 as 200.120.158.78 for edit warring and personal attacks, promised on talk page to return under new IPs.[1] Returned June 14, 2014 as 189.124.217.111. Quickly blocked for one week again for a return to the same edit warring and personal attacks. Back as 187.17.57.15 before the expiration of the most recent block with more of the same. Reverting all edits under WP:DENY. SummerPhD (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user has had a history of edit-warring going back at least a year. See this revert on WP:LAME by 200.119.246.254 (talk · contribs) regarding warring on Cleo Rocos by 190.46.98.195 (talk · contribs) and 190.208.49.108 (talk · contribs). Also warred on Jeremy Spencer as 200.120.211.91 (talk · contribs) and 200.120.211.239 (talk · contribs). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
The editor is making no secret about the fact that he/she is evading blocks by changing IP addresses: he/she has even said that he/she will do so. I have blocked 187.17.57.15, re-blocked 200.120.158.78, increased the length of the block on 189.124.217.111, and semi-protected some articles that have been affected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
04 May 2017[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Seems to match Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. Engaging in not one but two edit wars right now for trivial reasons as stated by Gary Dee (talk · contribs) ([2]) Jasper Deng (talk) 23:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
kindly explain what the hell possible reason this "Gary dee" had to undo my edit before accusing me of "trivial reasons" and concocting bizarre claims about me. Also why are you falsely accusing me of removing spellings? Just like "Gary dee" you seem to just like reverting and don't bother to understand what it is you are undoing. It seems very likely to me that "Gary dee" and "jasper deng" are in fact sockpuppets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.130.4 (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. I see that your edit summaries often contain "rm pov" and your edits often remove "reknown" or some form of. Plus, you're edit warring, showing a combative attitude, and making an unfounded accusation of sockpuppetry. In other words, behavior characteristic of this user.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
that failed to explain why your pal Gary dee undid my edits. And I don't think I ever saw the word "reknown" before but I'd probably remove it if I did, because I think we want to write in proper English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.130.4 (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
This page is supposed to report multiple accounts being used by the same person. The person reporting is supposed to provide evidence, and the evidence must be clear. IP addresses are not accounts; no evidence has been provided; only vague and frankly weird accusations based, apparently, on common shorthand that I used in a couple of edit summaries. Thus I trust this vexatious report will be suitably laughed at and the reporting user warned not to be so silly in future. 95.145.130.4 (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
The history in the archive is old and meager. Range-blocked. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)