Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 274

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 270 ← Archive 272 Archive 273 Archive 274 Archive 275 Archive 276 → Archive 280

Jamaliya Syed Khaleel Awn Moulana

That page doesn't contain any copyright material and it was deleted unjustly —Strangeshahn (talk) 07:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaykh Jamaliya Syed Khaleel Awn Moulana, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Boachsoft Finance

Boachsoft Finance is a personal finance software that has had millions of downloads since the first version was released in 2005. The website is active[1] and Boachsoft is scheduled to release the next version later this year or early next year[2]. The article shouldn't have been deleted because it is an important product to many and wikipedia articles on competing products like Moneydance, Quicken, You Need a Budget and so on are still in existence. Deleting the article impedes the ability of users of personal finance software from making an informed comparison. Deleting the article can only be described as discriminatory with the preceding statements in mind. The product has been rated five stars on download.com software directory[3] —172.93.98.194 (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Wikipedia does not care about the existence of other articles in a similar topic area or about the usefulness of the article. We also generally do not cite YouTube, download sites, or the subject (or those associated with it) as sources; see WP:Identifying reliable sources. I will also note that Wikipedia uses nofollow tags specifically to stop situations like this one (i.e. a business' principal attempting to use Wikipedia to increase its own Google standing) from happening. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ http://personal-finance-software.boachsoft.com/
  2. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZInXK8cPFo
  3. ^ "Boachsoft Bizcom 2017". Download.com.

Draft:Learnosity

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rachelmurrayliu (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:National Security Analysis Center

I, Subs99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Subs99 (talk) 17:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Last time I restored this no one made any improvements to the draft. What do you @Subs99: intend to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Leave It Open (album)

This is a major label release (on Arista Records, now BMG) by an established artist, Pierre Moerlen's Gong, who have an article on Wikipedia —Nectar3 (talk) 01:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Jordan Daley

this page should NOT be deleted or re-edited based on the fact that Jordan Daley is a public figure and CEO of various major corporations within the eSports community. Hes verified on just about every social media as being a public figure as well as an actor in Hollywood. —Jdaiey (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jordan Daley is not deleted or in immanent danger of deletion, so it can be edited. Notice that when pages are put here, one of the conditions is that it can be edited by others. If you Jdaiey are in actuality Jordan Daley, and wish to verify on Wikipedia, you can make a statement on your user page at User:Jdaiey and use WP:OTRS to prove it. Whether or not people are on social media makes no difference as to whether an article would exist here. Instead we require others to have written about the person not on social media. If I do an internet search for a person, and the top 10 hits are all social media sites, then I know they should not have an article on them on Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Jeffrey Prang

Jeffrey Prang is an elected official for 8 million people in one of the most populous counties in America. He is indeed an important elected official. The reasons previously used to delete this article are a personal attack against him and should not have been taken seriously. We were not arguing that he's important because he was involved in a sex scandal. We are arguing that he is important because he was the mayor of West Hollywood 4 times (note page for current West Hollywood mayor, John Heilman) and we are arguing that he is important because he is the assessor of the County of Los Angeles (note page for John Noguez who served in the same position and has a page to him that no one is arguing should be deleted) —Reubenzadeh (talk) 18:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Note that WP:Biographies of living persons was cited as a key reason for deletion; that particular policy is not negotiable and exists to ensure that information on living people is sourced as well as possible. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
@Reubenzadeh: Who is "we"?
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Prang. If any new information has come to light since that discussion was closed, bring it up with the deleting administrator. Also, please refrain from WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments — other articles on Wikipedia have no bearing on whether we keep a particular one. Each article stands or falls on its own merits. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Taylor Tran

I, Wveselzam, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wveselzam (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Unocoin

I, Baleepgain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Baleepgain (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

International_Fund_for_Houbara_Conservation

Article was deleted for copyright reasons. We at OTRS received a ticket (Ticket#2017070310014248), which seem to be legitimate, authorizing those contents publication under CC-BY-SA-3.0. Can you please look into this? Thanks. —Darwinius (talk) 10:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Little Bit Lost

I, 116.212.205.206, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 116.212.205.206 (talk) 09:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Houndstooth (record label)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Butterworthrj (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC) Houndstooth is a record label from fabric Records, arguably the leading mix series in electronic music that has been in existence for nearly 16 years, the label of fabric night club in London. Houndstooth is 4 1/2 years old and has released works from a total of 15 artists. Most notable are Snow Ghosts who have had their music synced to a number of TV shows and the X-Men: Apocalypse trailer. Another artist Special Request had his first album awarded album of the year by DJ Mag. The label is a highly respected independent electronic music label and a member of AIM (Association of Independent Music). Their catalogue of releases was listed but can of course be removed if this is unacceptable to administrators. Can we get this page reinstated?

@Butorworthrj: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houndstooth (record label), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Dhinchak Pooja

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —122.172.83.203 (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

The page was deleted in accordance with WP:A7 and then re-created, and subsequently the creator requested deletion. The most recent version would likely also qualify for A7 deletion. I'm willing to restore it to draft space, but its most recent state isn't appropriate for main space. Please let me know if that's OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

The Law of One

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —173.187.227.85 (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Wikipedia has a ton of bureaucracy I don't understand, so I hope I'm doing this right. I'm just an average joe looking for a summary of The Law of One books. I found the full texts online, but I'm just looking for a summary of what is taught or emphasised. Then I found out the page was deleted. This seems odd in a repository of information.--173.187.227.85 (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

At the moment, The Law of One is a redirect to another article.
Sorry, but the original article about the book has been deleted due to multiple WP:AFD discussions and is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. See for example Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Law of One (2nd nomination) and all the other discussions listed in the box on the right of that page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

DerrickCobey1

This page was deleted prematurely. I was still in the process of working on it. "The Scottsboro Boys" which a part of musical theatre history and American history is an important Broadway legacy. I was a part of its creation. It the last musical created by John Kander and Fred Ebb. I am part of that legacy as I created the role of Andy Wright in it. Our show was nominated for twelve Tony's and as a result of our musical being produced the original nine Scottsboro Bpys were pardoned. Please don't throw this page under the bus.

Sincerely, Derrick Cobey — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerrickCobey1 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

  • The page was highly promotional so, as usual, it cannot be accepted as by WP:What Wikipedia is not; however you're welcome to show how exactly it would be improved and with what, as an alternative. Major reviews is one instance. SwisterTwister talk 01:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
@DerrickCobey1: First, don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. Second, if you must write about yourself, use your sandbox, or start an article in draft space, like Draft:Derrick Cobey and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. That is the only viable way an editor with a conflict of interest can publish an article here. Finally, remember also Wikipedia is not your free web hosting service, so don't use your user page to advertise yourself. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Buck Mason

I, 138.229.71.78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 138.229.71.78 (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Evia Lifestyle Center

Please restore the page under a draft under my user name. I found a few sources but I'm still waiting for more. I also intend to work on it. —BugMenn (talk) 07:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@BugMenn: It was deleted as a copyright infringement of http://www.vistamalls.com.ph/mall/evia-lifestyle-center/ so it cannot be restored to any location. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:HedgeSPA

I, 73.71.149.243, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.71.149.243 (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Bandung

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —M R Karim Reza (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Bandung is the capital of West Java and 2nd most populous city in Indonesia with more than 8 million population. It is an important financial and educational hub in southeast Asia, which has a long history of culture and heritage. It has many high rise building already. The city is going through transforming its skyline for last few years. Most of the high rise were built after 2014. Look at the list of tallest buildings in some western cities like List of tallest buildings in Cardiff, then compare whether it is worthy to keep or not!

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Bandung, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Postdlf (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joel Northrup

I, Kgintert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kgintert (talk) 16:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Training Management Software

I, 90.63.249.240, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 90.63.249.240 (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

I want to improve the article to submit it as new information has appeared since I last worked on it (February) —90.63.249.240 (talk) 09:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Landsec

G8 speedy deletion would be invalid if the article Land Securities had been moved along with the talk page. After undeletion, please restore the page to the last revision before the circular redirect and the addition of {{db-talk}}. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ERa Eternity

hard to follow chain of page moves, but I'm retrieving this draft —Prisencolin (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Henley Visa Restrictions Index

Merge the history versions to Henley & Partners Visa Restrictions Index and create a redirect in this title. —GZWDer (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Nancy Staudt image.jpg

OTRS agent: a message was received at ticket:2017011910018547 from the correct copyright holder which released this file properly under a free license. It was previously deleted at FFD due to lack of response. Kindly restore and ping me so I can arrange for this file to be moved to Commons. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 12:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC) —seb26 (talk) 12:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done @Seb26: can you tag the image as having permission so it doesn't get deleted again. Hut 8.5 12:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Dreams Media

The Dreams Media is an registered company in Govt of India who manage bollywood artist as well digital media partners of bollywood movies —Vakasahmad08 (talk) 09:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Athaenara (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
I won't be undeleting it. It says what the company does, claims it does it very well, names the founder, explains the name in terms of fulfilling wishes "in the field of social media marketing", gives its registration numbers, and then has an "Our Network" section. It is not an encyclopedia article. – Athaenara ✉ 00:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Financial Fortitude Radio Show (2)

Requesting undeletion. The new producer of the show has the knowledge and ability to show notability, which last year I did not know how to do it. She will begin work on it immediately. —Leaddog1969 (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The new producer of the show" is the worst possible person to be working on an article about it, unless you have a publicist. ==Orange Mike | Talk 20:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Someone better put in an effort on this page, otherwise it will be the last time this is being restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Squala Orphan Draft1

I, JPR1977, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JPR1977 (talk) 18:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Javid Husain bibliography

I, 2600:1700:210:25DF:B504:F930:C4EB:EB0F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1700:210:25DF:B504:F930:C4EB:EB0F (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft: IAmMatthewian Project

I, NovaBrunswick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NovaBrunswick 19:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Nancy Mullane

I, 73.202.149.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.202.149.83 (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Nancy Mullane Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Bruce Replogle

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2601:197:C180:C90A:253E:9163:1FB2:A745 (talk) 23:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea why the page was deleted.

I founded and run http://musicmanagementusa.com/, and have been in business since 1980 when I was John Lennon's publicist on Double Fantasy.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best regards, Bruce Replogle

Dhinchak Pooja

I believe that she is famous, I just need to check why she is famous —122.174.32.116 (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The deleted article claims "Indian viral sensation". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

3 images related to an OTRS ticket

OTRS agent: ticket:2017042910008499 was received and alleges copyright ownership of the above files. Kindly undelete the above so that I can see the files, and evaluate the ticket. Ping me when finished and I will adjust the file pages accordingly. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

In relation to ticket:2017042810014242, I also need to be able to see this file and evaluate its respective ticket. I will adjust the page accordingly also. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 15:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Nyttend (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm Rose, Darling

An AfD from last year was closed with a result of "keep". Previous deleted revisions should therefore be restored. Same reason as for ‎Heena Parmar above. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Not done Two of the three deletions involved redirects, and the third one (the PROD) resulted in the deletion of a page consisting of 27 words, aside from the title and the infobox. Nothing will be useful here. Nyttend (talk) 03:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Heena Parmar

The AfD was closed as keep, so previous deleted revisions should be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done Three of the five deletions (1, 2, and 4) were BLPPRODded; there's really no good reason to restore such a page, unless it's going to be fixed or unless someone made a mistake in deleting it. The third deletion was A7, because the entire page was an infobox and a few sentences about her playing a few TV actress roles. And the fifth deletion involved only a redirect. Nyttend (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Bernard Lortie

Not sure why the page for this well known and infamous terrorist was deleted, without an AFD discussion. —Nfitz (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Nyttend (talk) 03:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Jacques Rose

Another infamous terrorist. PROD explanation was Outside of the October Crisis, individual has no notability. Isn't that like saying outside of the Civil War, General Lee had no notability? —Nfitz (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Done Actually not; WP:ACADEMIC #6 covers university presidents. You're thinking more like J. E. B. Stuart, who wouldn't have been notable had he died in early 1861. Nyttend (talk) 03:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Tsebo Solutions Group

This page should not be deleted. It's for educational purposes only, referencing the history and creation of an African company. —Royce van der Zwan (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

  • This page has not been deleted and isn't currently nominated for deletion. Hut 8.5 06:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Planète Chocolat

Planète Chocolat is a Chocolaterie in Brussels and in Belgium and has the same rights for publishing their own company model and content like all the other companies around the world. Of course, the references and the standard of an encyclopedia article have to be considered. All the references are available, but one aspect in the context was a problem : "Ryan Stevenson" = namedropping. Ryan Stevenson was an important employeer and a part of Planète Chocolat Team (6 month employed) and cannot be ignored in this way.Informative references were changed and adjusted. Additionally, the content aspect was also improved. Links for tracking motives do not exist. —2A02:A03F:2ACB:5700:941D:B70C:FCE0:F475 (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Planète Chocolat is not deleted or proposed to be deleted. There is no right to publish material on Wikipedia. If you want to discuss the content on the page, use Talk:Planète Chocolat or find the user that made the change and talk to them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Haylie_Pomroy

I, Hayliepomroygroup, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hayliepomroygroup (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sally Swanson

I, 50.1.126.77, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.1.126.77 (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Financial Fortitude Radio Show

The show now has the ability to properly show its notability. —Leaddog1969 (talk) 14:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Actually, this was  Done by Graeme Bartlett. Pppery 01:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Memphis Hustle current roster

The template is needed since it follows the same criteria as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:NBA_Gatorade_League_roster_navigational_boxes. —Syracusestorm (talk) 02:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done The page you created (an article, by the way, and not a template) had just one player and a head coach; please create a new template (in the right namespace) with the whole roster. Nyttend (talk) 02:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter)

The article Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter) was tagged for speedy delete on the basis that it was a duplicate of Self-balancing scooter. I had already provided an explanation on the associated talk page (Talk:Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter)) linking to a 10 day long discussion on Talk:Self-balancing scooter that resulted in agreement on a limited scope for the other article and my decision to create this new one. Since the speedy delete tag has added, I and one other added further justification for it's retention as requested.

It was deleted soon after without any reason being given for why our justifications for inclusion were not acceptable. The deletion has left red links in the Dicycle, Personal transporter, Self-balancing scooter, Segway PT and Self-balancing unicycle articles.

Thanks. -- PeterEastern (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Thank you for responding RHaworth, and also for reinstating the content in my sandpit area as per request on your talk page. We can now pick the conversation up on the appropriate pages. Do note however, that the discussion about creating this new article was on Talk:Self-balancing scooter (section heading Scope), and not on talk:personal transporter. PeterEastern (talk) 11:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Ofinno Technologies, LLC

This page is not promotional in nature. It has multiple citations to back up the facts about the business. —Conversion Pipeline (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Deb (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. It is possible for an article to be sourced to the gills and still be promotional as that is more an issue with the text and tone of the article, and has little to do with the article's sourcing. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Please undelete Fire in the Sky (Quasar album)

Please undelete this page as it is still current. (Redacted) —2601:205:4201:4740:9C83:761F:343A:2D48 (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Thanks Keith Turner

We do not link to online storefronts, and we are not a billboard. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Only trying to give reliable sources, what do you need as I don't understand why anyone would delete this page? Keith

We want professional music reviews on the album. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

The Loreli (album)

Please undelete this page as it is still current (Redacted) —2601:205:4201:4740:9C83:761F:343A:2D48 (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Thanks Keith Turner

We do not link to online storefronts, and we are not your billboard. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Only trying to give reliable sources, what do you need as I don't understand why anyone would delete this page? Keith — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.161.152.126 (talk) 18:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

See above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Isinglass (band)

I, ArmitageAngel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ArmitageAngel (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Financial Fortitude Radio Show

the show has continued to grow and a new show producer knows what needs to be added to the profile in order for it to meet Wikipedia requirements for publishing —Leaddog1969 (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Ke Yunlu

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ian Johnson (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Author Karen Dionne.png

OTRS agent: ticket:2017050510009549 has reached its conclusion and has sufficient evidence to confirm this file is available under a free license. Kindly ping when restored and I will adjust the page's information appropriately. Cheers —seb26 (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26:  Done--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Metcon Sales & Engineering

We'd like to bring back our page from June 10, 2017 since we want to display information regarding Chemical Feed about Canada and innovation products in Bulk water, septic receiving and others that Metcon was involved in being one of the oldest Chemical Feed company in Canada and changing the market. —David K 14:59, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

"We"? We don't allow shared accounts, and if you're editing on the company's behalf you're obligated to declare as such on your userpage. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
@Jéské Couriano: The account name is User:DavidKMetcon and it has been compliant with our policies for disclosure since 2015.
@DavidKMetcon: The draft article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G11 because it was unambiguously promotional. Wikipedia is not to be used as a promotion or publicity platform, ever. As such, it cannot be restored by request on this page. In fact it was deleted twice, 8 minutes apart, by two different administrators, Spinningspark and Jimfbleak. Your best approach is to contact one of those administrators and ask that it be restored so that you can rewrite the article in a neutral tone. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
@DavidKMetcon: Apologies, I noticed you were requesting restoration of the June 10 version, not the recent version that got deleted. That was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G13 so it is restorable.  Done, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Fik-Shun

Not sure what happened, but it seems like it may have been deleted unfairly. He's pretty relevant and notable. —Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done Hi Paintspot Infez If you think he's notable, write an article, citing sources evidencing that. This was not deleted unfairly, because it was not an article with any good content, and speedy deletion in general is not deletion on the merits. For example, if someone creates a copyright violation on a thoroughly notable topic, and that's deleted, that says nothing at all about the subject, just that the particular attempt at creation was mangled. The page you're here about one was a drive-by creation that had this as it's entire content: {{Fik_shun}} (which makes me think it was some mix of test editing, and a confusion about template markup). It was then deleted after the person agreed it should be deleted on the talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Got it. Never knew a good article was never made. Paintspot Infez (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Sultan Nur Ahmed Aman

This page was created by me and it was deleted for copy right violation. But I'm the original author too for the material in www.archive.org under the above title which is the reason for the deletions. I have made sure the original materials in archive.org is a public domain. I can verify that the materials are mine and both my account on archive.org and Wikipedia account are under the same email "Save page" button below —XKeyse (talk) 01:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The source linked in the deletion log is licensed under CC BY 3.0 per this, which is a WP:Compatible license. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Oh, awesome. I'll go undelete that once I'm done here. Might be worth it to send in an OTRS ticket to confirm, but I don't think it's required. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Vasile Troian

Expired PROD. Requester and deleter unsure of procedure. User talk:Fastily#Vasile Troian —Thincat (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

List of My Love from the Star (2017 TV series) episodes

Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE)

I would like to request that the article Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE) be undeleted. It was deleted due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Here is a list of relaible third party sources for the article I would be happy to include as references if the article is undeleted.

Many thanks

--John Cummings (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC) —John Cummings (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Citra Maja Raya

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —M R Karim Reza (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC) (talk) 11:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC) This is not about advertisement. Its about a new township, which has an area of about 2000 hectares. I failed to realize why its listed for deletion, as I am still preparing the topic.

 Not done, nothing to do. The page is neither deleted nor currently proposed for deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

G1 (website)

this article was deleted under PROD in 2010. It was nominated again for PROD and recently deleted. I have no particularly strong opinion on notability but believe that this should have been taken to AfD. —Hack (talk) 12:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done Yes, this is a rather extraordinary thing, to decline a request to restore a PROD. My rationale is that it would warrant an A7 speedy deletion, because it doesn't even demonstrate importance: the entire contents were G1 is a Brazilian news portal maintained by the Rede Globo. It was released on September 18, 2006, in the anniversary of 56 years of TV in Brazil. Versions in English and Spanish subtitling the site's videos were unveiled in 2010. I don't think it wise to un-prod something that would immediately qualify for speedy deletion. But Hack, if you still strongly believe that this should go to AFD, I'll undelete it and start the AFD. Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

PS, please note a couple of things. First, when it was deleted the first time, the entire contents were The portal G1 is a news portal owned by Organizações Globo. Definitely no need to undelete that unless the later deletion gets undeleted as well. Secondly, in the past it was a redirect to Organizações Globo; someone created it as a redirect there, very soon after the first prod, and it remained thus for over a year. What do you think of having it as a redirect? Nyttend (talk) 00:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

It's the most popular section of Globo.com, which is in the top five Alexa ranked sites in Brazil, ahead of the likes of Wikipedia and Twitter. I'm surprised someone didn't remove the PROD. Hack (talk) 02:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
So, Hack, which do you prefer: that I restore it and nominate it for deletion, or that I restore it and immediately redirect it to Globo.com? Nyttend (talk) 23:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
@Nyttend: a redirect to Grupo Globo#Internet pages would be great, thanks. Hack (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Done And you're quite welcome. Nyttend (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Clifford michaels

I dont see why he is not a notable person, his books were famous all over the world which satisfies the notability criteria in wikipedia —59.88.244.142 (talk) 03:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Then discuss it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford michaels. This page isn't the place for it. See the message in the box at the top. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards

This is an award ceremony not a product or and anything that is promoted. I request it is not deleted. Please advice how i can make it better. Kind Regards —Kawalyadouglas (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Kawalyadouglas: It was written in a blatantly promotional, non-neutral tone, and as such it wasn't suitable for main article space. It would require a complete rewrite. I recommend you start over again in draft space. Create the article at Draft:Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards and submit it for review via the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you are in any way associated with that event, then you have a conflict of interest, and Articles for Creation is the only viable venue available to you to get an article published on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research

{{subst:refund National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research It is a article about an educational institution. Someone tried to delete the page and someone wrote bad language in this page. I would request to undelete and revert it to previous stage what is was before. i don't know why he wrote bad things about a good engineering institution. please. }}

This page, National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research, has not yet been deleted. Please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (2nd nomination) to find out how to object to the deletion request. Nyttend (talk) 02:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:NACRA

I, ZeroXero, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ZeroXero (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Nintendo - 1950.png

Image was deleted for non-free file usage violations, as I became aware of this just now, I would like to have the page restored and inspect the problem to resolve it, instead of deleting it, so to not have to have a hole in Nintendo's logo history. —Lordtobi (✉) 17:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

@Lordtobi: The image looks like an ace of spades playing card. The deletion rationale was "Not used according to the purpose stated in the rationale: as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article." How do you propose to resolve that? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Well, the image was not used in the infobox, and it seems that it was its only violation? So, we can simply put a rationale for a section-used image (I know that there is) and have the file not violate anything else. Lordtobi (✉) 16:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
@Lordtobi: OK, I have restored it and changed the rationale. Please go in and make corrections as needed, and add the image to the article otherwise it will be deleted again. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, appreciate it! I have adapted the rationale and the image in the article. Lordtobi (✉) 13:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_274&oldid=1136434642"