Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/Yesterday

Purge

Second Person Shooter Zato

Second Person Shooter Zato → First-person shooter#Recent innovations: 2006 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is a redirect to a now deleted piece of content from this article, also "Second Person Shooter Zato" isn't even mentioned at all in the article as of now. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OB(oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold

OB(oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold → OB-fold (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

probably won’t be typed — Karnataka 19:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

note that I haven’t CSD’d this because I have a pending RMTR to move the article from Wikipedia namespace to mainspace — Karnataka 19:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Related comment: I just updated the redirect's target from Wikipedia:OB-fold to OB-fold (as well as updated this discussion to show the redirect targets OB-fold instead of Wikipedia:OB-fold) to avoid an erroneous WP:G8 speedy deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not per nom since redirect length is not an issue in cases such as these, but since the purpose of the words in parentheses is apparently to define what "OB" means, which is essentially stating/typing the same thing twice. However, on that note, I can see the plausibility of redirects such as Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding-fold or (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold targeting the target, but am choosing not to create them myself. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it seems the redirect's creator originally created an article at this title, but then shortly after performed a WP:CUTPASTE move to change the article's title: That content is currently at OB-fold, the target of this nominated redirect. For this reason, I do not see the edit history of the nominated redirect as needing to be retained. (However, if this redirect is kept, there should probably be a history merge to OB-fold to ensure edit history is not on both pages.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated title might be an error, but it's not unambiguous enough for me to speedy delete it under G6. Thryduulf (talk) 20:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brave, the Movie

Brave, the Movie → Brave (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Brave The Movie (Movie) → Brave (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These redirects were the result of moving the page about the 1994 film to the title Brave (film) (which was later redirected to the current target's "Film and television" section)—the first redirect to the second and the second to the "(film)" title. These redirects haven't gotten very many pageviews nowadays, so I'm not 100% sure they're really helpful here. I think we should either delete them, or, if they're kept, refine them to Brave#Film and television, though I'm open to other courses of action if they're suitable. Regards, SONIC 678 19:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In 2005, the rule was that a redirect resulting from a page move had to be kept, even if it wasn't particularly useful or logical, for WP:GFDL attribution reasons. That's no longer the rule anymore, and such redirects don't need to be kept anymore if they aren't actually serving an important purpose, which this isn't. Bearcat (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aero blue

Aero blue → Shades of cyan#Aero blue (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There is no mention of Aero blue in the target page. ... discospinster _talk 16:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It existed when the redirect was created (see [1]), though it was un-cited and a fairly poor description, and the also see seems to point to a fairly different color, so it's not surprising if someone deleted that section (and forgot to look for redirects to it) in the intervening 11 years. :) —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 18:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That version linked to Air Force blue, which also does not mention "Aero blue" currently. Plus it's azure, not cyan! So changing the redirect won't help. ... discospinster _talk 20:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NURALIZA oSMAN

NURALIZA oSMAN → Nuraliza Osman (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Created in error and moved shortly after; we don't need WP:UNNATURAL redirects from titles entered with caps lock activated. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cita

Template:Cita → Template:Blockquote (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This was presumably created for es:Template:Cita, the Spanish Wikipedia's Template:Blockquote equivalent. However, it is also inappropriately used sometimes for it:Template:Cita, which is a citation template. Both of these foreign templates use unnamed parameters, so the difference isn't always noticed. I would suggest that English editors will be confused by this name and not sure what it means. I'm not opposed to foreign-language template redirects in general, but when they are ambiguous, I think they should certainly be removed. Daask (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as template disambiguation page. If we delete it, people who copy wikitext for translation from es.WP or it.WP will end up populating Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates, which is undesirable. Let's make it a template disambiguation page that points to {{blockquote}} and {{sfn}}, or whatever the best en.WP matches are. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If people who copy wikitext for translation from es.WP or it.WP use a template that is ambiguous between those, it is undesirable. I'm not sure there is a big difference between making it transclude a nonexistent and a disambiguated template. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vague. (However, this redirect has transclusions that need to be bypassed prior to deletion.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Test0

Template:Test0 → Template:Uw-vandalism1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test1 → Template:Uw-test1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test2 → Template:Uw-test2 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test3 → Template:Uw-test3 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test4 → Template:Uw-vandalism4 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test5 → Template:Uw-block (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test6 → Template:Uw-vblock (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test7 → Template:Uw-voablock (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test1a → Template:Uw-delete1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test2a → Template:Uw-delete2 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test3a → Template:Uw-delete3 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test4a → Template:Uw-vandalism4 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test-n → Template:Uw-test1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test0-n → Template:Uw-test1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test1-n → Template:Uw-test1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test2-n → Template:Uw-test2 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test3-n → Template:Uw-test3 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Template:Test4-n → Template:Uw-vandalism4 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This "set" of templates redirects to 6 different user warning templates. These should all redirect to the same set, or be deleted. Current setup is unhelpful. Gonnym (talk) 08:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "test1a", "test2a" series of warnings was made to customize a message to people who tested in article space by randomly deleting portions of text rather than inserting random words so having the redirect to a separate set of uw-templates was a deliberate choice. While widely used then, I believe the newer templates have become firmly entrenched by the RecentChanges patrol. I have no problem with deprecating or deleting these if they have fallen into disuse. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters

List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters → Grand Theft Auto Advance#Characters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of charaters in grand theft auto advance → Grand Theft Auto Advance#Characters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of charaters in Grand Theft Auto Advance → Grand Theft Auto Advance#Characters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of characters in Grand Theft Auto Advance → Grand Theft Auto Advance#Characters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No such list or section at target. However, Grand Theft Auto Advance#Setting and characters does exist, but it does not contain a list of characters. (List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters is a {{R with history}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirected article [2] until and unless a valid AFD of the article is done (rather than a unilateral undiscussed and unproposed redirect). Softlavender (talk) 02:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Restore without prejudice per Softlavender and WP:BLAR. Thryduulf (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Czar since they WP:BLARed List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters in 2015 [3]. Steel1943 (talk) 12:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retain. Grand Theft Auto Advance#Setting and characters is a perfectly valid target and alternative to deletion for character lists that are clearly without sourcing for independent notability. The plot section covers everything the reader needs to know about these characters. Sending this unsourced "list" to AfD is needless process unless you think deletion is a better outcome than redirection here. If the "list" title is the issue, then rename as "Characters of Grand Theft Auto Advance" but you'd still have the old title pointing to that redirect. czar 13:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add that many, many "Lists of GameTitle characters" articles redirect to their parent articles' Plot sections same as this does. It's a common redirection because these character lists are just as commonly created, almost always without regard to sourcing. czar 16:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restore article? Or simply refine to the "Settings and characters" section of the current target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no way that the original LoC would survive AFD, and the game itself is only 10ish hours, so even a (new) character section as redirect target seems overkill. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retain per Czar. Softlavender and Thryduulf suggest restoring and sending to AFD for procedural reasons. as Sgeureka recognizes, this will surely fail to be retained at AFD, which as Czar correctly points out, will likely lead to a redirect. I see no reason to go through that process. Thryduulf points to WP:BLAR, but I see nothing there requiring us to restore it or go through AFD, since no one appears to be arguing for the article to restored.
I'm confused by Steel1943 and Sgeureka's insistence that the redirect target be an actual list. Grand Theft Auto Advance#Setting and characters is a fine target without any modifications. We can and routinely do redirect list titles to articles which discuss the list subject but aren't lists. Daask (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station

Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station → Runswick Lifeboat Station (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The lifeboat at Runswick was always Runswick Lifeboat. It was never Runswick Bay Lifeboat. All information previously contained in Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station has been relocated. I would like the page Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station to be deleted, as it is of no further use, and I believe all links have now been directed to Runswick Lifeboat Station. Ojsyork (talk) 19:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Argument for deletion is sound in my view. Tony Holkham (Talk) 20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a {{R from move}} the article was at this title from 2019 until about 3 weeks ago. There are also multiple sources describing the lifeboat as being at Runswick Bay, including RNLI (the article uses both "Runswick" and "Runswick Bay"), Tees Valley Museums, Art UK and The Nothern Echo. Thryduulf (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I understand that the article was created in error at "Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station", and now has been correctly moved to "Runswick Lifeboat Station". But, looking at the redirect afresh, its target is a page about a Lifeboat station in the village of Runswick Bay, and as such I think the redirect is acceptable. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/Delete I took some time researching the name of the lifeboat station before renaming the page. All images show 'Runswick Lifeboat' written on the boat, never 'Runswick Bay Lifeboat'. I also referred to old maps, and the village too was always Runswick. Even when the Runswick lifeboat station was closed in 1978, and Staithes reopened, the new station took the name 'Staithes and Runswick' Lifeboat, NOT Staithes and Runswick Bay Lifeboat. The only OLD reference in the area to 'Runswick Bay', was to the Runswick Bay Hotel.
BUT - it is the case that the village seems to be morphing from Runswick to Runswick Bay. Indeed, the remaining non-RNLI content of the 'Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station' page from which I have split content, has gone to 'Runswick Bay Rescue Boat'. If the place is called Runswick Bay from now on, then it's not my place to argue. The village page on Wikipedia is 'Runswick Bay', but contains a comment that some of the older village signs still say Runswick.
It is interesting that some of the reasons for KEEP, above, may be as a direct result of an incorrect Wikipedia page. My reason for deletion of 'Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station' page was to try to eliminate more of these errors continuing. Ojsyork (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of whether the term does or doesn't originate with a Wikipedia error (which seems unlikely to be the case for all uses) it is now a plausible search term. Redirects do not need to be correct to be useful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Thryduulf. I understand this title originated from an error on Wikipedia, but it existed for a significant amount of time, and during that time it is plausible that someone created an incoming link to it that we should not break unnecessarily. Tag with {{R from move}} and {{R from incorrect name}}. This isn't an unusual situation. Daask (talk) 14:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cow neck

Cow neck → Cow Neck Peninsula (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Seems like a plausible target for a neck cut of beef also. (Though unfortunately web search results seem to be obscured by misspellings of cowl neck.) 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The neck cut of beef in itself is not a WP:NOTABLE target. The Cow Neck Peninsula is notable, and moreover is known colloquially simply as "Cow Neck". Best, Castncoot (talk) 03:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep? Or retarget to Cut of beef?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to dab. The discussion thus far doesn't seem to recognize that Cow Neck is distinct from Cow neck. Cow, Cut of beef, and Cow Neck Peninsula are all plausible targets. "Cow neck" in reference to Cow Neck Peninsula is very rare, but has been used at at least once in print. Daask (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oc county

Oc county → Ocean County, New Jersey (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Search results for this are mostly about Orange County, California. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 01:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"OC" refers to Orange County, California; "Oc county" is used to describe Ocean County, New Jersey (the only Ocean County in the U.S.) Best, Castncoot (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Orange County, California and add a hatnote. Per the nom, the search results are overwhelmingly for the county in California (despite the tautology). Thryduulf (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Orange County, California Clear primary topic. I get some hits for other Orange Counties but not any for Ocean County, so I'm not sure about the need for a hatnote. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate to OC,CA; OC,NJ; Orange County, New York (where OCC is from, not Cali); and Orange County (disambiguation) -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 23:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. Most of the search results that I see are not necessarily to be interpreted as redundant acronyms. Instead they refer to things like the "OC County Government" or "OC County Clerk" meaning the county clerk of Orange County, California with "county clerk" being more-or-less the job title. In this case, these shouldn't be regarded as examples of "OC County" as a subject at all. This could support the target of Ocean County, but given the ambiguity in how these uses could be interpreted, disambiguation seems better. Daask (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Predictions of the end of Facebook

Predictions of the end of Facebook → Facebook (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Predictions of the end of Twitter → Twitter (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

If a reader typing predictions of t into the search bar (after seeing such an article for Google or Wikipedia) stumbles upon a page like Predictions of the end of X which redirects to X social media platform, they may be given the potentially false impression that the article on X may contain information about such predictions and may end up wasting their time scrolling through the article only to potentially conclude that no such information may be present. Sure, they were "merged" into their respective articles, but their poor usefulness is still a problem. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep End of Facebook and refine to Facebook#Userbase, the last paragraph of which has content on predictions of the end of Facebook. Weirdly enough I can't actually find anything like that for Twitter, despite the widespread doomposting after Musk bought it, but I would expect it would be worth a sentence or two at least in Twitter under Elon Musk or Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk. Rusalkii (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep of Facebook one: mentioned but I don't think it's that plausible a search term, nor something it makes sense to link to from other articles, but it does no harm. Delete Twitter one unless mentioned somewhere, in which case (weakly) keep or retarget as appropriate. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 21:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Refine the Facebook one per Rusalkii, above. Delete twitter one, it can be recreated if/once information about the many news articles speculating about the end of twitter under Elon is added to an article. Fieari (talk) 01:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just tagged Predictions of the end of Twitter as {{R from merge}}. Note that Predictions of Facebook's end would also need to be retargeted if the nominated one is. Jay 💬 09:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refine the Facebook one per Rusalkii. Delete twitter one per Fieari. No prejudice against recreation if a suitable target exists. Daask (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weekend Trip

Weekend Trip → List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Weekend trip → Tourism (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target. Ambiguous title. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added Weekend trip to this discussion, which points to a completely different article that also doesn't mention the phrase, although it is clearly related. In terms of articles that do mention the phrase, almost all are NOTTRAVELGUIDE violations or passing mentions in plot summaries. Thryduulf (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd call this a weekend away which doesn't exist, but Weekend Away does (and targets an article on a film). Depending on if a viable target for the others can be found this too may need thought about. If no target for the first two can be found then I suppose they will be deleted and nothing changes for Weekend Away. 78.149.135.163 (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both With capitals, this is the name of the weekend primetime programming block for TV5 (see playlist on the channel's Youtube). Without capitals, it's a common form of tourism or leisure activity. SFB 20:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both, but add a mention to both targets to make them useful. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 08:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. There isn't any information on "weekend trips" here on EnWiki. Better if we let search results handle this. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no mention at either target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween Cup

Halloween Cup → List of figure skating competitions (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No mention in target. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has been added to the target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and make a redlink at the target so it encourages article creation. Currently it is a self-redirect and has no information other than the country - Hungary. Unfortunately, so is the condition with some (or several) other entries in that list. Jay 💬 18:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ragg tuning fork

Ragg tuning fork → Tuning fork (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

that's apparently some brand that produces tuning forks. not mentioned in the target, doesn't seem like there's anything reliable regarding it cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, it is a brand but from what I can tell it seems to be one of, if not the, most notable manufacturer of tuning forks with at least two apparently reliable sources discussing it in depth [4] and [5] so there would be no verifiability issues with adding a mention. Whether a mention would be due or not I don't know, but I can't say for certain it wouldn't be. The redirect is getting suprisingly many views (over 100 this year), at least some of those will be because it's linked at rock gong but whether that's responsible for all of them I can't say (if the redirect is deleted that link must be updated). Thryduulf (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
weird place to put what's effectively an ad (or mistaking "ragg" as being part of the name), but i won't question it cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv ^converse∫_edits 13:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target and the creator pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Based on sources linked here, it does appear to be a notable in Europe, and seems similar to the redirects utilized in Category:Redirects from brand names. I would be happy to edit in a sentence to tuning fork as well about well-known manufacturers, if needed. Shotgunheist ^💬 15:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no mention of "Ragg" at this time. If a mention is added to the article, feel free to recreate the redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WP:INVOLVED relist to close the page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Utopes. Thryduulf's first source is native advertising. I appreciate Shotgunheist's offer to add to the article, but I'm wary of adding brands to articles on their industry without putting in the effort to ensure it is reasonably comprehensive and well-sourced. It's not a quick task. Daask (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Untitled Kendrick Lamar song

2024 Untitled Kendrick Lamar song → Watch the Party Die (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is getting absurb. Same spirit as Untitled Kendrick Lamar song RfD; already named. Roasted (talk) 03:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong keep this is getting hundreds of hits a day, it's unambiguous and unquestionably useful. Thryduulf (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for this. Unlike the "Untitled Kendrick Lamar song" RfD, there are no other pages this can link to, its not ambiguous. What's more is that its target doesn't have a title, it literally is a 2024 untitled kendrick lamar song. It's a useful redirect that gets a good number of hits ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The target is notable for being untitled. The target's current name is apparently WP:OR that can be cited, and is not the name the song's artist chose for the song. Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Untitled Kendrick Song

2024 Untitled Kendrick Song → Watch the Party Die (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Same spirit as Untitled Kendrick Lamar song RfD; already named. Roasted (talk) 03:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The target is an unnamed 2024 song by Kendrick. "Watch the Party Die" is just a line in the chorus not a name. So this is accurate and unambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 11:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per my argument in the other RfD and Thryduulf. ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The target is notable for being untitled. The target's current name is apparently WP:OR that can be cited, and is not the name the song's artist chose for the song. Steel1943 (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Kendrick Lamar song (2024)

Untitled Kendrick Lamar song (2024) → Watch the Party Die (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

In the same spirit as Untitled Kendrick Lamar song RfD; already named. Roasted (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above - the song is unnamed ("Watch the Party Die" is just a line from the chorus) so this is accurate and unambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per my argument in the other RfD and Thryduulf. ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The target is notable for being untitled. The target's current name is apparently WP:OR that can be cited, and is not the name the song's artist chose for the song. Steel1943 (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SLSB

SLSB → Capitán Germán Quiroga Guardia Airport (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Ambiguity between this and Jakarta Enterprise Beans#Stateless Session Beans was pointed out in Special:Diff/1183640947; in addition, there is Notre_Dame_University_Bangladesh#School_of_Life_Science_and_Biomedical_(SLSB). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 00:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig there is also Sri Lanka Savings Bank, Société lyonnaise des schistes bitumineux (mentioned extensively at Les Télots Mine, I think it's a former operator but I'm not completely sure) and the entry at Association of Luxembourg Student Unions#Great Britain may or may not warrant an entry on the dab page. Sierra Leone Standards Bureau is the primary topic for me on Google but I can't immediately find any mention here. Thryduulf (talk) 01:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate per Thryduulf. Daask (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]