Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 5

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 5, 2024.

Roland Burris Burial Site

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Roland Burris#Personal life and education. ✗plicit 11:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant section has since been removed, and the burial site is only linked from Roland Burris and a see-also at Burris. We could logically redirect this to Roland Burris, but we'd then realistically need to remove those incoming links as circular and redundant, respectively. Better, I think, to delete this, and recreate it later if the situation warrants (presumably not before his actual death). BDD (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sarcastive

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 13#Sarcastive

Eumephism

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 11:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

created as a possible misspelling, but... it doesn't seem like it. i got no results cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brody Foxx

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect not mentioned at target. Off the top of my head this is some youtuber who makes jokes like this. Whether he is notable enough to be mentioned on it, I don't know, but as it stands no reason to redirect. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - This looks like a plain example of a vanity redirect. You know the expression, "If you look up **** in the dictionary (on wikipedia), you'll see a picture of (thing rhetorically being associated strongly with ****)"... someone is trying to make sort of thing actually happen for this guy. We shouldn't oblige. Fieari (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the person who made the redirect, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Why are you accusing me of creating the redirect out of vanity? I simply created it because I thought the character was notable and well known enough to be a viable search term on Wikipedia. gangplank galleon (talk) 09:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • If he was a notable youtuber, the solution would be to make an article for him, not redirect to an article about the sort of thing he does... you may not have intended it as vanity, but the end result is indistinguishable from it. I don't think he's going to meet the notability standards though: see the project YouTube essay on youtuber notability here. Under the assumption he's not a notable youtuber, and we have no mentions of him on wikipedia, then the only solution is to delete. Fieari (talk) 00:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not mentioned in target -1ctinus📝🗨 21:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Terrokar Forest

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Terrokar Forest

TSTM

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Thirty Seconds to Mars. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think these should point at the same target? (Also, definitely not primary, but there is a song on Cat Spectacular! with this title.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Some overly capitalized redirects

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the capitalizations used, these are not likely or useful redirects (WP:RCAPS). Note that these were all created by the same user, and there were a lot more, but they've been R3 tagged (no spaces between commas and words, punctuation at the end, etc., perhaps these should have been R3 tagged as well). Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all - recently created. If these were older ones I would have reconsidered. I wouldn't mind some of these in proper case. However, R3 is for typos and misnomers, and these are neither. Jay 💬 14:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah that's kind of where I struggle @Jay. I don't think all caps are necessarily R3 eligible, but I have seen some people process similar ones. It just didn't feel right for me to R3 all of these though because it doesn't fit the description of the criteria, even if it's applied slightly differently in practice sometimes. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete all as raw. a lot of those aren't even committed to being in all caps cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as implausible/Wp:UNNATURAL. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PANDORA. Not useful -1ctinus📝🗨 16:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PANDORA is not a reason to delete anything, it's a misleadling harmful mix of WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Some all caps redirects are unquestionably useful, others are not. Thryduulf (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like you should create a counter essay to WP:PANDORA, which itself is a part of a counter essay to WP:CHEAP. lol -1ctinus📝🗨 15:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
something like that thing lunamann did? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zelensky: The Unlikely Ukrainian Hero Who Defied Putin and United the World

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fyi, A listing of books was removed from the article because such a list was claimed to fail WP:NOTDIRECTORY.GobsPint (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of items in Sonic games

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No such list at the target article, and there does not seem to be any applicable target in any of the Sonic-related subtopic articles either. Steel1943 (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. list not present, sonic isn't known for having a clear definition of "item" (are wisps items?), list unlikely to be present since wikipedia isn't known for being a game guide cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Emeralds

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Super Emeralds

Solitaire (solitaire)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Solitaire (solitaire)

Canon Professional Services

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and at least "Canon Professional Services" only seems to have passing mentions. Tagged as {{R to article without mention}} in 2018 but should probably have just been RfDed back then already. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Double digest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 00:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Double digest" is better known for being a marketing term used by Archie Comics than as a synonym for restriction digest. In fact, the current redirect target does not mention "double digest". Kinopiko talk 00:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_5&oldid=1245442431"