Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 8, 2024.

John Seed[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 17#John Seed

FBC Olomouc[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 16#FBC Olomouc

The New Orc Times[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Orc (slang)#Usage. New Orc Times has already been re-created as a redirect to the same section. (non-admin closure) Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was nominated for speedy deletion as an attack page. I can't tell whether this is a sufficiently notable meme to be included in the target article or at Orc (slang) but I don't think this should exist as an unexplained redirect documenting an attack meme. —Kusma (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination should also include New Orc Times, without the The (a redirect nominated for speedy deletion, contested, then deleted without discussion).  —Michael Z. 17:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is just a silly redirect that is meant for a mispronunciation, but I find it highly unlikely that a reader will have that bad English to spell "York" as "Orc". The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 17:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Orc (slang), where this meme is covered based on reliable sources.  —Michael Z. 19:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nakedly[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15#Nakedly

Nudities[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix redirect, nonsensical word. Xeroctic (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nudely[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15#Nudely

Lonnie Kris Wellington[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because it makes no sense and is incorrect. Kris's full name in Deltarune is Kris Dreemurr. 75.188.222.163 (talk) 12:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, there is an actual person with said name which comes up when you search up Kris Wellington. I’m not sure if this page was created out of bad faith though, the edits related to it likely were. Said editor who made the page has a good history and likely made the page out of mistake, we don’t know why though. 2A00:A040:1A3:B38B:40C2:B07F:4BCD:236B (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The page was made by mistake, and admittedly I had some doubts about it being a real possible name for the character. The unregistered edits that were made to link to it, however may have been made by someone stalking someone else with that actual name, I was not aware of this and therefore I wish for the page to be quickly deleted. I have been on break from Wikipedia, so I apologise for the inconvenience caused. SignedInteger (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since you're the person who created the redirect page, and are currently wishing for it to be deleted, then I think that means the page would now qualify for speedy deletion criteria G7, "author requests deletion". — Jamie Eilat (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and do it, I don’t want the page to stay up now that I’ve learned that it is someone’s actual full name, it feels overwhelmingly wrong for it to stay up. SignedInteger (talk) 00:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ReFill[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the entries on the dab page have any affinity for CamelCase. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Arrêt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Stop sign#Canada. Jay 💬 13:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too ambiguous foreign language redirect. Propose soft redirect to Wiktionary or deletion. WP:NOTDICTIONARY Awesome Aasim 04:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is the ENGLISH Wikipedia, not the French one. French people will type this on the French Wikipedia, but not this one. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 17:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or refine to Stop sign#Canada where explained. This redirect is for English-language users who may encounter the term and wish to learn more about it. In this case, we can provide those seeking an answer with one. -- Tavix (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) Retarget to Stop sign#Canada, which is about the controversy over "arrêt" vs. "stop" signs in Quebec. That controversy has been covered in English sources. France just uses "stop" on their signs. So this isn't about French people. SilverLocust 💬 22:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine per SilverLocust and Tavix -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Local pride[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no support for the current target, hence targeting to one of the suggestions that came up in the discussion - sense of community. Jay 💬 14:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just doesn't make sense to me as being the same topic. -- Beland (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively could be retargeted to Cultural exception or even dabified. Respublik (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think local pride is more within a country (e.g. your city versus others) than the transnational concept of cultural exception, and is less legal. It's the warm glow when your town receives an award, when your home team excels, when your neighbourhood boasts some superlative, or when your area is famously appreciated for something. Besides community building an alternative redirect is to sense of community. Mebden (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Local community, which is a much closer fit. I don't think even being "within a country" is enough to count as "local" unless your country is tiny. That said, given the modern connotation of "pride", perhaps one could also be thinking about specifically the intersection of local issues and LGBTQ+ pride, which we don't seem to currently have an article on? (Also, according to a google search I just did, there's also apparently a non-notable company called "Local Pride Heating Oil" in New Hampshire.) Duckmather (talk) 04:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, local community would serve at least as well: it covers the 'local' aspect handily, even though the sense of community article is closer to the 'pride' aspect. I've edited both targets just now to ensure that local community has a link to sense of community and vice versa. Mebden (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Government of Switzerland[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15#Government of Switzerland

Spondylous[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 17#Spondylous

Zee Estates, California[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mangoe (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete the above redirects to the enclosing county were created as fallout of the failed group nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Lakes Estates, California. All of them are NN subdivisions not mentioned in the corresponding county articles, nor should they be. I do wish that this sort of misleading redirect were not the "solution" to "save" these placename articles (all dumped in from GNIS, of course: see WP:GNIS if you don't already know why this was a bad thing), since the reader isn't going to find out about the thing, but they do get created nonetheless, so here we are. Mangoe (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all Completely concur with the last comment; all of these are non-notable developments not mentioned once in the target county articles, so that anyone searching for them on Wikipedia would find nothing. The redirects just create confusion. These articles were a zero-effort mass-creation and IMHO should have been mass-deleted. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_8&oldid=1196343901"