Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 5

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 5, 2024.

Veere Ki Wedding

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Veere Di Wedding and Veerey Ki Wedding both exist. Right now, Veerey Di Wedding redirects to Veere Di Wedding and Veere Ki Wedding redirects to Veerey Ki Wedding. How do we choose which directs to which? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eng.wikipedia.org

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Tagged as such by the creator and no non-delete opinions here. Thryduulf (talk) 23:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite curious who is searching for eng.wikipedia.org on the English Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Creator tagged this redirect with {{Db-g7}}. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
certain kinds of people google "google.com" to get to google, so this doesn't seem too out of the ordinary. still, delete as it's not even the right url, and i at least choose to believe in the average reader's ability to read the first 4 characters of a url that is almost permanently near the top of their screens cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Couch sex

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 13#Couch sex

Togey

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirects and the target unclear. It seems these topics may be related to some sort of torture device involving rope, but it seems the terms' usage is sporadic on Wikipedia on articles not related to torture. (Also, it may be worth noting that an article named Togie Pittinger exists.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

results gave me deviantart. i got nothing. delete togey, retarget togie to togie pittinger cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:+rp

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Like Template:+C (nominated below) this is an unused cryptic redirect that obfuscates the issue for editors. Indeed, in this case I can't even work out what "rp" is meant to stand for - nothing at Rp has an obvious connection to BLP sourcing. WP:RP is a redirect to Wikipedia:Requested pictures, the template for that is {{photo requested}} but the cryptic ambiguity would not be resolved by retargetting there (and the + wouldn't make sense) so I don't support that. template:rp is a redirect to Template:Reference page, a citation template, but again the + doesn't make sense in that context. Thryduulf (talk) 21:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:+C

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These are unused cryptic abbreviations in the same vein as the deleted Template:+L/Template:+l (RfD) that make it harder for editors to work out what the issues with the article are (categories? citations? comments? columns? colours?). Indeed even if you know C means Categories, it's ambiguous between template:improve categories and template:uncategorised. Thryduulf (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...like mario mario? i don't get it. results only gave me link by virtue of him being the primary topic for an entire word cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Mario actually has an official last name, which is Mario. Link doesn't have a last name, and since it hasn't ever been confirmed by Nintendo, it's implausible. Wheatley2 (talk) 01:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Triumph Forks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't even know what this is supposed to be. results only gave me fork-ish things that are apparently from a brand known as triumph cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hideously implausible. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete most of the hits are related to forks for motorcycles made by Triumph, but that is not an encyclopaedic topic. Thryduulf (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Evidently no one performed a search with "Triumph Forks" enclosed in quotation marks. There are many results discussing it, apparently it's a joke in a Zelda game. Nevertheless, I am leaning delete as it seems unlikely someone would look up an obscure joke from a video game on Wikipedia. Arguably, someone who doesn't get the joke might look it up, but would they really do so on Wikipedia? And is the redirect really helpful in that case, given that it's not explained at the target article? --Un assiolo (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I did perform the search with quotes, and while I did get a couple of hits related to Zelda it was literally only a couple among the many for motorbike parts. If it were mentioned at the target there might be an argument for keeping, but when it isn't it's not helpful for anybody - someone who knows the joke already knows more than the redirect can tell them, those who don't will still be left confused. It misleads both groups of people into thinking we have relevant content when we don't. Thryduulf (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. And apologies for assuming incompetence. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    did that, only got around 3 gamefaqs-era memes cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Tell me what human would ever even look up "Triumph Forks" on Wikipedia in the first place, even if they knew the obscure joke it came from. Wheatley2 (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Copper pan

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cookware and bakeware#Copper. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 19:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to my surprise, it seems there are other types of pans made of copper and known by that name, and sauce pans seem to be the primary topic (however that works for cooking utensils). i wanted to retarget it to cookware and bakeware#Copper, but there might be a better possible target i'm missing. opinions? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Cookware and bakeware#Copper. If there is a better target it doesn't immediately come to mind. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same as above - Retarget to Cookware and bakeware#Copper Wheatley2 (talk) 01:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Cookware and bakeware#Copper per Jéské Couriano --Lenticel (talk) 04:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

"Children's games", "Children's Games" & friends

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 13#"Children's games", "Children's Games" & friends

Children's games (role play)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though this redirect is a {{R from move}} and its target has a section named "#Role-play", the concept of "children's games" is not exclusive to "make believe". See Children's toys and games for a list of pages which could be considered "children's games"; some of the subjects listed at these pages could be considered "role playing" and are exclusive from "make believe". However, since there seems to be no target that encompasses the entirety of the redirect, I believe the best option for our readers is deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Religious movement

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was revert. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 19:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where this should target but I feel like the current target is very misleading. Any other suggestions? PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert: I agree with Thryduulf as well. Wheatley2 (talk) 01:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Miligram

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kilogram#SI multiples. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 19:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Miligram (band)#Requested move 20 July 2024. Consensus in the RM discussion was that this is more appropriate for RfD. The issues to be decided are: (1) Should the band's article be at Miligram? (2) If not, where should the redirect be targetted? This is a procedural nomination: my opinion is Neutral. Tevildo (talk) 12:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Saint Boy

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 29#Saint Boy

Symplectic action

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glossary of symplectic geometry#S. ✗plicit 10:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Term is not actually used at target, but listed in Glossary_of_symplectic_geometry#S. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget fine, a dictionary.Delete This is a math thing, not a physics thing, so the redirect is not correct. The topic is not notable on its own and not covered in other articles. No page history and only one incoming link. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Metal Mario

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 26#Metal Mario

Biden crisis

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Biden crisis

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_August_5&oldid=1242982707"