Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 14, 2023.

Marie-Anne Houde[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to wrong person. Not helpful. Led to circular redirect. Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Télesphore Gagnon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to a different person. Not helpful. Led to circular redirect. Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ekar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 17:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was created in 2012, then overwritten in 2017 with an article that was then speedily deleted. As the correct procedure in such a case is to restore the redirect, not delete the page outright, I have restored the redirect on procedural grounds. However, it's unclear to me (and, based on the history, perhaps also to Paine Ellsworth) why this redirect exists, and thus I bring it here. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This appears to be a WP:RFOREIGN—see id:Ekar and ms:Ekar. The unit of measurement has no particular association with Indonesian or Malay. Ekar is also a surname (see d:Q12788254), but it looks like we don't have any articles on people with this name. - Eureka Lott 00:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Striking my !vote. Not taking a position at the moment. - Eureka Lott 17:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Campagnolo, who makes the "Ekar", a gearset for bicycles. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't have an opinion about whether the Campagnolo gearset deserves a redirect. The only languages I read are English and a little French, but from what I can tell about the id:Ekar and ms:Ekar articles, they seem to be about the international and US survey acres. Since they don't seem to discuss a particular acre unique to regions where Indonesian or Malay are spoken, I don't see a reason to keep the redirects to acre. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate (drafted) for Eker village (also spelled Ekar) and a few brief WP:DABMENTIONs (including the above-mentioned bicycle gearset), none of which seem like WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. Draft looks fine. CycloneYoris talk! 00:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Louise Duffy (broadcaster)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Target Paul Galvin (Gaelic footballer) provides no info about Duffy other than that Paul Galvin married her. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Delete: While target does indeed provide "virtually no information" about Duffy: there are sources to expand it (WP:WIP) and I'm doubtful she would meet NBIO, and redirect got 19 views from May 13 to yesterday. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 19:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Per Tamzin. I did not see remotely that much in-depth coverage when I looked briefly. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 02:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK: [1] makes me think she's probably notable. If not, there's surely enough coverage for her work to be discussed on some article related to RTÉ Radio 1, in which case logic similar to REDLINK still applies, in that someone should write The Louise Duffy Show or List of RTÉ Radio 1 programmes or List of RTÉ Radio 1 presenters. Certainly better than defining a woman who is a public figure in her own right by her husband. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 23:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tamzin. Notability here seems plausible. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tamzin. A7V2 (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis mission[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Albeit a not very enthusiastic keep. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the mission needs a separate redirect as well Fram (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, unambiguous, potentially helpful. J947 † edits 21:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Even if someone types "mission" after the name of the organization, they're going to find the article without the help of this redirect. Largoplazo (talk) 21:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Never mind, it's reasonable as it points to a section by that name and it's a basic subtopic. Largoplazo (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - I can only cite WP:CHEAP and say it's theoretically plausible that someone might, after having read the article already, want to return to it and return to a specific section. It's a slight stretch, but I don't think it's harmful to keep. If others disagree with me though, I won't be upset. Fieari (talk) 03:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep per J947 and Fieari. A7V2 (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Per WP:CHEAP argument. Not misleading or nonsensical, obviously a little unlikely, but can't be much more unlikely than someone finding that absolute word jumble of an article title anyways IceBergYYC (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing data[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of these... Fram (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I'm tired of tailoring individual responses to these overblown titles. See my other !votes on this page where I did elaborate. Largoplazo (talk) 21:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Fieari (talk) 03:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: implausible search term. Several redirects that are sentences that have been nominated today are on track to be deleted. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above (or should that be below?). A7V2 (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing metagenomic data[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A third one of these, see also Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis offering computing infrastructure and Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing bioinformatics data both at RfD as well. "Long company name" + "does something uncontroversial" will rarely be a good redirect Fram (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete What is the point of having a redirect that's the name of the article with arbitrary words after it? On that basis, we could come up with thousands of equally valid redirects--which means, equally useless. Largoplazo (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Fieari (talk) 04:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chubbuck technique in United States of America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Target has nothing about a technique, and why anyone would search for it specifically in the US is unclear Fram (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

United States film directors rehearse[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, although it isn't even discussed in the target article, and isn't specific to US directors anyway (neither rehearsing nor the target article). All in all a rather random redirect sentence Fram (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

American actors rehearse with the director[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, they do. Probably not even restricted to American actors, and hardly the only thing they do in filmmaking. Utterly random, unlikely redirect sentence Fram (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis offering computing infrastructure[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anyone use the long full name, and then add something they do, as a search or link term? Fram (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(See also the very similar Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing bioinformatics data, posted to RfD yesterday) Fram (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as extremely implausible. A7V2 (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regulation of transvaginal mesh in the United States of America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be discussed at the target Fram (talk) 15:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Generation of hypotheses about possible ecological relations that are not yet known or well understood[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Way too long redirect repeating one sentence from the target article (and not really the best sentence to start with, with the "hypotheses / possible / not yet well known or understood" triple repetition) Fram (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sharia courts can be integrated into the American religious arbitration system[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Way too long, impractical redirect for one sentence in the target article Fram (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Who the hell is going to search that? Tellingly, it has gotten all of four views since it was created, three of them on the day of its creation (presumably all from the creator). If we had redirects for every idea in every article, we would have insane amounts of redirects no reader ever needed but which would need to go through RfD every time a/the mention of their topics was removed from the target. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 19:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This isn't anybody's concept of a name for a Wikipedia topic. Somebody seems to have summations and redirect titles confused. Largoplazo (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Fieari (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: implausible search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above. Regardless of how implausible this is, I would expect it to be to an article or at least a whole section discussing Sharia Law in America, not just one sentence. A7V2 (talk) 08:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Isaac Newton/Authoring Principia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica#Publishing the book. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the link is to a redirected page Artem.G (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Garage 59[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently a redirect to Andrew Kirkaldy (racing driver).

  • This person did absolutely nothing that has to do with the Garage 59 project. It was an American-French project about testing out an American car in a French car race, this individual is British, and although a Brit (Jenson Button) did participate in the project, it was not Andrew Kirkaldy. - Ricciardo Best (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, Garage 59 is a British auto racing team owned by Alexander West, Andrew Kirkaldy and Chris Goodwin.[2] Formula Downforce (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If you're referring to the NASCAR entry in this year's 24 Hours of Le Mans, I believe that to be Garage 56, but I also thought that this was Garage 56 when I first saw it as well, so I made the mixup myself as well. TartarTorte 18:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or at least don't keep it here). There are 105 mentions but I can't pin down a good target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk)
  • Delete: It seems from their website that they are owned by two people with wikipedia articles, the current target Andrew Kirkaldy (racing driver) and also Chris Goodwin. It seems that there isn't a good target for it. TartarTorte 18:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jack & Jill(film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of a space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Jack & Jill (film), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Choi Jung-won (footballe)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a leftover from a July 2019 page move to the correct title because of the spelling error in the disambiguator. I'm not sure we should have this still lying around. Regards, SONIC678 05:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Comedian Matt "Crag Hartin Fan Club" Maiellaro[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term, not in target article. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Wikicrime on wheels![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely pointless redirect. Seems to be a remnant of a page move after a "Willy on Wheels"-type attack Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 02:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Linked from WP:WikiCrime itself as one of the WikiCrimes, CHEAP, generally don't see the harm in keeping it. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 18:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Heavy Water. Fieari (talk) 06:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – joke redirects are fine. J947 † edits 08:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

InternationalComparisons.org[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was a blurb at the target article about this website--which appeared to have been put there by someone connected with the website. There's no indication of the significance of this website. The text was promotional, worded from the perspective of the site's promoters, and sourced only to the website itself. The icing on the cake is that the website's home page says "We are featured on Wikipedia as a premier research website for evaluating advanced democracies." So it seems to me that the text in that artice, which I've removed, was an abuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. I'm not sure about this redirect—I'm puzzled, as its apparent creator is a longstanding, user, albeit one whose focus is on creating redirects. So maybe this was just one of them that happens to have been an ill-advised one. But, still, since the text in the article is gone, it no longer makes sense for this redirect to target it. Largoplazo (talk) 02:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Good find. As of yesterday, target was a pile of SYNTH, ESSAY, CRUFT, and spam. Now it's just SYNTH and ESSAY and might not survive AfD if taken there. As to the matter at hand, I just removed some CRUFT, and now there is no mention of Internationalcomparisons.org at target. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 19:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought I'd gotten it all, thanks for the assist! Largoplazo (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above. A7V2 (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_14&oldid=1161431785"