Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 26, 2023.

Schoolmates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that this Filipino TV series is the best target for "Schoolmates", which is a common noun throughout the English world. While we do not have a particular article on being schoolmates or Classmates, we do have Alumni, which is a related concept, and to my mind, seems a better target, where a hatnote can be added to point to the TV show. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

67.70, Iskool is the Filipino translation to School. So, move the page you requested to Schoolmates (TV series), and change the redirect to another page. This can happen if your request will be accepted. 176.33.242.229 (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this recent creation which is a common noun. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not sure if its worth retargetting to student or alumnus since they are not closely synonymous to each other although they can be considered as related terms. As for anon's suggestion above for page move, , I don't think the show is marketed as "Schoolmates" as online English references call the show Iskoolmates. --Lenticel (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete its not mentioned in the target, I would have suggested redirecting to the same target as Schoolmate, the singular but that doesn't exist and Classmates is a DAB without anything useful. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Queen of Morocco[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 3#Queen of Morocco

Central Transportation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are divided between the status quo, disambiguation, and retarget suggestions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous search term which could refer to a number of possible targets, such as Penn Central Transportation Company, Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation, Central Maryland Transportation Alliance, etc. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The current target seems to be the only one actually referred to as "Central Transportation." The others appear to only use the phrase as part of their long-form, less common, names. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd argue disambiguating to be the most logical option in this instance, given that "Central Transportation" can refer to quite a large number of topics. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If there are other entities called "Central Transportation," I'm okay with disambiguation. Otherwise, the examples you state wouldn't be valid targets per WP:PTM. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Presidentman. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

CYP81A[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a family of cytochrome P450s, but they are not mentioned or described at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. This was apparently created for use in a link at Treatments in California agriculture; I have replaced the link with one directly to the target so as to not be astonishing. This should probably be deleted per WP:RFD#DELETE#10 i.e. WP:REDYES, but I would be okay with retargeting to the page where it is mentioned(Treatments in California agriculture), as it would give some information to anyone searching it. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The P450 subfamily can probably support an article on its own with the interest it has drawn in recent years due to several members being responsible for the multiple herbicide resistances seen in agricultural weeds. Pretty niche and technical though. Pubmed search ― Synpath 06:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Magpul massoud[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently an awful misspelling (and miscapitalization) of Magpul Masada, an alternative name for the target that also redirects there. There is an old stub in the article history that was almost immediately redirected to essentially an identical topic, there is no chance this content would be preserved at Afd so I think we can free ourselves of it here (WP:SNOW). Mdewman6 (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia talk:SPACE[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. There was interest in disambiguating WP:SPACE, however that was not this nomination's intent, and that may be a separate discussion. Jay 💬 04:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:SPACE targets the main page for WikiProject Astronomy and has done so since 2016, but the corresponding talk shortcut targets Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Space, which has been a defunct WikiProject for a long time (the last new section excluding a notification from this RfD was created in 2019). Both of these should be consistent, and it is a lot more likely that people are looking for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy than the current target. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate both WP:SPACE and WT:SPACE for WP:WikiProject Astronomy (stars, planets, asteroids, space weather, outer space telescopes, outer space probes) and WP:WikiProject Spaceflight (satellites, satellite television, astronauts, space tourists, space rockets, space telescopes, space probes) -- there seems to be a lot incorrect assumptions that spaceflight is somehow astronomy and vice versa in both categories, templates, redirects and stub-types, that still remain after the WikiProject Space was disbanded as being an unwieldy conflation of aerospace and space science. This is one of those remaining cleanup issues. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 02:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the same talk page as the talk page's target namely Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy otherwise disambiguate WP:SPACE. Its confusing to have a main page and its talk page go to different pages. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to match WP:SPACE. This should be uncontroversial, WT:X should always match WP:X. If there is a desire to change WP:SPACE, then that redirect should be brought here for discussion. For what it's worth, I don't see a strong argument for changing that redirect. It especially should not be disambiguated because then it would no longer be able to function as a shortcut. -- Tavix (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gothic hilted British infantry swords (1822, 1827, 1845, 1854 and 1892 patterns)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily long page title, unlikely to be a search term. Liz Read! Talk! 17:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Equaliser (2020 TV series)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#The Equaliser (2020 TV series)

Mugam (2018 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 2018 film. This targets to a 1990s film. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Echoic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Echo. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary mentions echo first. [1] fgnievinski (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_26&oldid=1168807034"