Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 6, 2022.

Legends Card Checklist(Magic: The Gathering)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 19#Legends Card Checklist(Magic: The Gathering)

Crime Ring[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 15#Crime Ring

Hooked On Love[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. At Hooked on Love. Jay 💬 05:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has redirected here since 2009. Not sure why, it is not mentioned in the article. Searching shows there are over 20 songs by this name in different albums. This should probably be a dab for all those songs, unless anyone thinks one of these songs is a PT (but there should still be a dab also). MB 19:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Somethin' 'Bout You Baby I Like (album), where it has pointed to since 2009. There is even a hatnote on that article pointing to other options. This is simply an artifact of a recent name swap between the single and the album. I thought I corrected all links, I guess I missed this one. Muhandes (talk) 07:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Or Disambiguate as proposed below. --Muhandes (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Well duh![edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 15#Well duh!

Wikipedia:CRACKPOT[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Fringe theories. Jay 💬 10:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target page has been superseded by Wikipedia:Fringe theories. Better for this redirect to target there. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per the nom. Most users will want to read the guideline that applies today, not a failed proposal from 2007. Glades12 (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Weishan Airport[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused as to why this points here. A Google Search throws up only one hit https://www.goibibo.com/airports/weishan-wus/ "temporarily unavailable for users in your region" but seems to be referring to Wuyishan Airport (IATA: WUS). None of the entries at disambiguation page Weishan are associated with an airport. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion about the goibibo hit.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Clearly a costly redirect. Both redirects have very low pageviews, and I doubt the link cited in the nom is used enough to warrant retargeting. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:FORRED. Weishan is the Chinese name of Ulsan, but there's no connection to justify a foreign-language redirect here, and the target is not an international airport either. An archive.today capture of the goibibo link shows it's indeed referring to Wuyishan Airport for some reason [1], but "Weishan" is also a highly unlikely typo for "Wuyishan" so this isn't worth retargeting there either. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ὀφίουσα[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell this word does not mean Cyprus. On the English Wikipedia it is noted as a former name of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi and a former name of Avşa (only in other articles), nowhere immediately obviously sourced. Searching on the Greek Wikipedia, nothing appears at all however el:Οφιούσα (differing only by the presence of a diacritic) is a disambiguation page between articles interwiki linked to Kythnos, Tinos and Chios none of which include either spelling; Οφιούσα is red here. I'm not sure what is best here. Thryduulf (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of the discussion at the target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, tempted by the redirect suggestion to Ophiussa given the article title, but if it referred to many places then it is perhaps best deleted as an unlikely non-English search term. CMD (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per CMD and Furius. Jay 💬 10:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Griechenland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Name of Greece#Graecia-derived names. signed, Rosguill talk 16:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED, there is no particular affinity between German and Greece. Languages of Greece notes it only as a foreign langauge, known by about 9% of the population. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

French redirects to Greece[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED. There is no strong affinity between the French langauge and Greece - Languages of Greece notes it as a foreign language known by only about 8.5% of the population (the third most common foreign langauge). Thryduulf (talk) 09:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tirior[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maigraith[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target (I removed a mention in Special:Diff/1120357002 as failed crystal balling following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fate of the Children) * Pppery * it has begun... 15:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United States Telecom Assocation v. FCC (2016)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

misspelling by me ("Assocation"), accidentally created when moving some page titles for related articles; I submit it for deletion for basic housekeeping reasons ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fifi Oropeza[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current target isn't helpful. I've no idea what/who "Fifi Oropeza" is. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I can't even find this person in Google Search. --Lenticel (talk) 01:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non notable per Lenticel and possible hoax Roostery123 (talk) 03:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferox - Gasoline/Fuel Additive[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current target is not helpful. Ferox is a proprietary fuel additive but not mentioned in that article. Since Enwiki appears to have nothing substantive to say about it, I suggest delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects with no spaces between brackets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious errors (missing space before the opening parentheses) in remnants from page moves for which I should never have left a redirect in the first place. BD2412 T 05:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rulke[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mendark[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I thought about a retarget to Dexter's Laboratory as Mendark is a character there but it is not mentioned. Roostery123 (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Roostery. There's also a questionably notable singer with that as his stage name, and that term is one letter off from "Mandark," but I don't see "Mendark" mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. This redirect'll just have to go until something comes up with that name. Regards, SONIC678 16:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Generation AA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading, and a possible WP:HOAX. "AA" doesn't equal "alpha". Steel1943 (talk) 02:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It is a valid term for Generation Alpha as seen here: [2][3] Roostery123 (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Some sources use the term Generation Alpha as seen here: [4][5] I turned the keep vote to comment because I saw that these redirects got 0 views in a year. Roostery123 (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Looking at Google, I only see about 8 results related to Generation Alpha. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Isn't that enough for a redirect? Espiecially if a significant source Forbes use the term Roostery123 (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No. The first of those sources uses its own idiosyncratic terminology (it also refers to Baby Boomers as "Generation W") and the second is intended to be humorous ("They are dubbed Generation AA because they are in recovering due to having millennial parents.") Dan Bloch (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thats how I see this as well. The use of "AA" here is the equivalent of calling Baby boomers "Generation W", and well ... Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 9#Generation W. The existence of this redirect also makes the assumption that "Generation A" is a term used for the "generation" 25 "generations" before Generation Z ... and well, it doesn't go that far back. Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    What I meant was that there were way more other results that talked about other stuff which implies that there is no primary topic. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 22:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure if you are responding to me, but I was responding to the person I indented after, which was not your comment. Steel1943 (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I was responding to @Roostery123. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Among Us redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that Amogus and Amongus are plausible redirects, but Amingus doesn't seem all that plausible. I could say the same for redirects Among is and Mong us. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 01:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete along with "Among is" and "Mong us" as impluasible misspellings. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the listed Among Us redirects per others 04:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Vanished user 60279853583153 (talk) 04:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Delete all except for Among is, as it is a probable typo, per Roostery123. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I took the liberty of merging both nominations that were listed above, since both redirects "Among is" and "Mong us" are already mentioned in this nomination. CycloneYoris talk! 04:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_6&oldid=1122766724"