Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 16, 2022.

Social unit[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 5#Social unit

List of royal visits by Queen Elizabeth II[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 06:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an American, I would have expected this to point to List of state visits made by Elizabeth II. I take it "royal visits" is understood to mean to Commonwealth realms? If this is widely understood throughout the Commonwealth, maybe this is just a case for hatnotes. But given the existing hatnote at List of state visits made by Elizabeth II, and the fact that her visits to Commonwealth realms are a logical subtopic, I recommend retargeting.

Note also that Royal visit redirects to State visit. --BDD (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambugate with links to the Queen's state visits and tours of Commonwealth countries. Peter Ormond 💬 15:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate: There are two plausible search terms for this, and they cover subtly different sets of visits. People could be looking for either of the two. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think disambiguation is the best option. See WP:TWODABS. Commonwealth visits are a subset of state visits. --BDD (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or perhaps disambiguate. She is Queen of Australia, for example, so I don't think it's appropriate to call it a "state visit", as she is not visiting representing a foreign country. Further, per State visit#United Kingdom, state visits do not occur between the United Kingdom and Commonwealth realms, technically. Searching online indicates that the existing target is the primary one for "royal visits", certainly List of state visits made by Elizabeth II is not the primary topic as far as I can tell. A7V2 (talk) 03:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2's research. Another ignorant American here, but it looks like this is "just a case for hatnotes" after all. -- Tavix (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more relist for a firmer consensus following a trend towards keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: As stated by A7V2, as she is often the Head of State in these countries that she is visiting, they are typically not referred to as state visits. The current target is a bit more accurate, but I am fine with hatnotes also. TartarTorte 16:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settings in Battlestar Galatica[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 12#Settings in Battlestar Galatica

Erik Young[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Erik Young

Αγήνωρ[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Αγήνωρ

Cosmic Evolution[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus / retarget to Cosmic Evolution (book). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This term is based on a broad, multi-discipline definition by the author Eric Chaisson.[1] It is not discussed in that context in the physical cosmology article; indeed, the term isn't even mentioned in the article body. The hatnote on the physical cosmology article almost resembles self-promotion. Hence I propose that the redirect be pointed to Cosmic Evolution (book). Praemonitus (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

North East Indian cuisine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Northeast India#Cuisines. signed, Rosguill talk 06:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target does not specify what cuisine is considered "North East Indian", leaving readers searching for these terms without specific information about what they are looking for. In addition, North East Indian cuisine was formerly an article for about 9 years before it was WP:BLAR-ed. Steel1943 (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore the "article", which was simply a list of articles on the cuisines of various individual groups in Northeast India. Tag as a WP:SETINDEX until someone writes a proper article. There are WP:RS available which cover northeastern cuisine as a distinct subgrouping [2][3], so putting these individual groups together in one article isn't just WP:OR. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 02:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Northeast India#Cuisines. Shhhnotsoloud's suggestion is not bad, but this one seems more comprehensive. I like the overview of popular dishes and staple foods, beyond just linking to subtopic articles. --BDD (talk) 01:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per BDD. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🐱‍🚀[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 9#🐱‍🚀

Sarbhangi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google Scholar searches suggest that Sarbhangi and Sansi are distinct castes (e.g. [4]). Unless RS can be provided that claim they are in fact the same, it looks like this should be deleted to encourage article creation. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to encourage article creation --Lenticel (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Allegheny County[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest a retarget to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, the original target, with a hatnote to the dab page. It was changed to its current target by Nyttend in 2013 with the rationale Change target; yes, it's the only one with this spelling, but it could easily mean one of the others with similar spellings and identical pronunciations, but WP:MINORDETAILS exists, and in addition to being the only one with this specific spelling, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania is the most prominent county on the dabpage by far (by population, pageviews, etc; certainly a primary topic for its, again, unique spelling). eviolite (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Young Kindaichi’s Casebook[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#Young Kindaichi’s Casebook

Diphosphorus trisulfide[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 23#Diphosphorus trisulfide

SLAY[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#SLAY

Palindromes.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNNATURAL spelling with trailing full stop. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Shhhnotsoloud. Pageviews aren't enough to justify keeping in my opinion. eviolite (talk) 13:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unlikely spelling variant since autocomplete in the search bar would already bring up the target article before this redirect --Lenticel (talk) 03:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This doesn't appear helpful to me. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Epitipe[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25#Epitipe

Letter of protest[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 30#Letter of protest

MOS:PSEUDOCODE[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#MOS:PSEUDOCODE

Park Jimin (musician)/junk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having a "Junk" redirect is not useful. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

200-gon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of polygons. ✗plicit 00:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for polygons with arbitrary number of sides; all not described at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retargeting to List of polygons might be an option. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nonadecagram[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 06:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for specific star polygons neither mentioned at target nor at Star polygon, Polygram (geometry) or elsewhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and article improvement. These are actual (legal, existing) names, and so the target is the place to go for further understanding. The target should be improved with a more clarifying overview (keyword); likey the target can be {{anchor}}ed there. -DePiep (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These redirects were initially targeting the articles for the corresponding convex polygons until the latter were redirected to this page. I disagree that the current target is helpful for further understanding in its current state, but if these terms were added to this wiki, I suppose the place would be Polygram (geometry). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Enneagram of Process[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Article's history contains a poorly written article superseded in scope by the various articles at Enneagram that is not needed for attribution signed, Rosguill talk 06:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, neither appears the history of this redirect to be used there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page's history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heteropalindrome[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:heteropalindrome. signed, Rosguill talk 05:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia; could be soft-redirected to wikt:heteropalindrome though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Semordnilap[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only passing mentions on the English Wikipedia, but could be soft-redirected to wikt:semordnilap. Note that there is some history behind the first one of these. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_16&oldid=1092738602"