Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 20, 2022.

Chithravadham[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was an article about impalement as an execution method in medieval Kerala, but is no longer mentioned at target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stevens grips[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Stevens grips

Maan Kunwari[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 29#Maan Kunwari

Chief Pastors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No articles seem to link to it. Indeed, almost nothing links to its target. Feline Hymnic (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Molinos en ritmo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Molinos en ritmo

Military intervention[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Interventionism (politics). ✗plicit 00:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A military intervention is not necessarily an invasion Gaetr (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Junk food vegan[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Junk food vegan

Edenic diet[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This term is not identified at either of the redirects' targets, leaving what these redirects are supposed to represent to be unknown. (However, Edenic diet is a {{R with history}}, meaning we may have had content about the redirects' subject in the past, but it doesn't look like we do now.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ZieZie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moot (in the American sense). Page is no longer a redirect. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To facilitate easier search. WP:RDELETE #2 may apply: might cause confusion since ZieZie is not Aitch. They have cooperated once, but so did Banx & Ranx, Digital Farm Animals and more. WP:RDELETE #10 may apply: could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Muhandes (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: Apologies for my revert on the redirect, I thought for a second I was still on my talk page. That being said, I'm curious. How did you come across this redirect? Surely if you've stumbled across this you would have come across plenty of the same sort of redirects (featured artists being redirected to the articles of artists with whom they've collaborated once) created by the users Lk95 and AshMusique? I hardly do this sort of thing anymore and yet those two users are still doing it every week. Just saying... Ss112 02:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I stumbled across this redirect while adding the BPI certification for "Chop My Money" by iLL BLU featuring Krept & Konan, Loski & ZieZie. Yes, I stumble across such redirects quite often lately and I nominate them for deletion whenever I find them, I think they are a bad idea. --Muhandes (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete so we can approve Draft:ZieZie. In fact, instead of filing this, that's what I would have done myself—moved it over the top of my redirect. Maybe the draft could do with a little bit in the currently empty "Career" section, but aside from that there's notability. Ss112 02:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, didn't notice there was draft. I have no objection to that, seems notable enough to me. --Muhandes (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is going on with this redirect, it has both an RFD tag and a CSD tag on it and it's confusing to admins who review pages tagged for speedy deletion. If you want another page moved to this one, maybe this discussion should be closed. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn Not sure who did what, but the draft I worked with was (prematurely) moved over the redirect, so this can be closed. --Muhandes (talk) 09:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vegan athletics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target article mentions in passing athletes who are vegans, but nothing specific in regards to the subject mentioned by the title of the redirect. In other words, readers searching this term hoping to find a subject about this will not find what they are looking for. Steel1943 (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It's not worth keeping this category as the op says on the veganism article it is not about athletics. There is no other article this can be redirected to. Also there is no such thing as "vegan athletics". Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 14:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hollywood Goes Green[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at Hollywood, Los Angeles (which was just moved from Hollywood, which is now a disambiguation page) Plantdrew (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Searching finds the term is used in journalism about the industry making films about "green" subjects or the industry itself adopting "green" practices. I don't see any suitable target. Go green redirects to Environmentalism, but there is nothing in that article specific to the film industry, much less Hollywood.MB 15:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps there should be a section added to Cinema of the United States discussing environmental concerns addressed by that industry. BD2412 T 22:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 01:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dealul Radului[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except retarget three to Giurtelecu. ✗plicit 00:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By my count, we are down to 23 unhelpful redirects to Măeriște. I think this is a small enough group to bundle them together as one "miscellaneous" nomination. I have verified that there is no mention of any of these terms (or variants) at the target page. -- Tavix (talk) 16:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Without a mention these are at best confusing, at worst misleading. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jurtelec and Jurtelecu should be retargeted to the dab page Giurtelec as phonetically plausible misspellings (in English) for the two places listed there. – Uanfala (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC) Zsurtyelek can similarly be retargeted there: it looks like a really wonky spelling variants but it's attested in a source or two. As for all the other redirects, it seems deletion to be best: these all represent minor topics that were mentioned in Giurtelecu Şimleului before that got blanked and redirected in 2009. It doesn't seem likely any of those mentions will be coming back. – Uanfala (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fastest NFL Player[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Fastest NFL Player

Audrey Price Whelan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by Bbb23 per G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No coverage of Audrey Price Whelan in redirected biography, only an un-supported statement that she is the spouse of Michael Whelan. No evidence of importance, notability or even being factual.

Failed WP:CSD#R3. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Check his website and literally his Wikipedia says it on their. 2ofthe22ofthe2022 (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and his wife and him run his website 2ofthe22ofthe2022 (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I have removed the unsourced claim from the article. Veverve (talk) 02:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No useful content about the subject at the target. Jay (talk) 07:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete the article 2ofthe22ofthe2022 (talk) 22:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yellow-orange vegetables[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to recreate or restore upon adding a sourced description at the target. -- Tavix (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be any such list or identification of the subject of the redirect in the target article; in fact, the word "yellow" appears nowhere in the target article. For this reason, readers attempting to locate a topic by this name when searching the term will seemingly be left with finding nothing about the topic of the redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • This appears to be a shortcoming of the article rather than the redirect. A quick scan of Google and Google Books hits for "Yellow-orange vegetables" indicates that this is a grouping well-reported on in the real world. I would be inclined to keep the redirect and add at least a line to the article noting that some sources distinguish "Green vegetables" from "Yellow-orange vegetables" for purposes of dietary recommendations and the like. BD2412 T 21:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • See, e.g.: Thomas E. Moon and Marc S. Micozzi, eds., Nutrition and Cancer Prevention (Marcel Dekker Inc., 1988), p. 228: "Foods chosen for nutrient composition analysis, based upon the results of epidemiologic studies, are divided into two broad categories: green, leafy vegetables (e.g., broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, kale, spinach), and yellow-orange vegetables (e.g., carrots, pumpkin, red palm oil, squashes, sweet potato)". BD2412 T 02:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add sourced description at target if possible based on BD2412's analysis, otherwise delete due to lack of mention to defer to search results. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add sourced description at target if possible based on BD2412's analysis, otherwise delete due to lack of mention to defer to search results. Veverve (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless a mention can be added. Jay (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Salad vegetable[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Salad vegetable

Shabji[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Shabji

Fruit vegetable[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Fruit vegetable

Beffroi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no support for the nomination's delete or retarget options. However, retargeting to Belfry (architecture) based on the lone opinion as a better target with a mention. Jay (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary WP:RLOTE from French; either delete or possibly redirect to Belfries of Belgium and France (the only term on the dab page relevant to the Francosphere), though the latter does not list the French name of the site at all in prose. eviolite (talk) 04:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Belfry (architecture), which has an extensive etymology section that mentions beffroi. That said, it probably shouldn't have that long an etymology section, and this isn't that plausible a search term, hence the weakness of this !vote. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mammoth tank[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Mammoth tank

Modding (Command & Conquer)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#Modding (Command & Conquer)

Atarbekyan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 18:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear why these redirects target here, which gives rise to a confusing hatnote. "Atarbekyan" is mentioned at Sevan–Hrazdan Cascade and, for a different reason, at Artimet. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the article was originally at Atarbekyan; it was moved to the current title in 2017 and the name Atarbekyan was removed from the article with no explanation. (The sole source cited (GEOnet Names Server) seems to block my IP range as well as my VPN and Tor, so I can't access it.) 61.239.39.90 (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Despite two relists, this had participation from only one user. One final try.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. This sounds vaguely like an Azeri-language name for the municipality, but wikidata links a different entity altogether. If it was formerly known as this (as the IP says their map suggests), then this sounds like a perfectly fine redirect as a former name. But the thing is that the Sevan–Hrazdan Cascade article says The Hrazdan Hydroelectric Power Plant, known as Atarbekyan during the Soviet years, is located between the Sevan and Argel stations and it gives a map that puts the Hrazdan plant basically exactly where the Soviet map says "Atarbekyan" is. As such, it's unclear to me if the map is pointing at a former municipality or if it's pointing at a power plant. In the former case, it would make sense to keep. In the latter, it makes no sense to keep the redirect as-is. — Mhawk10 (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Queeensbury[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete, so this will instead be retargeted to Queensbury. -- Tavix (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. Created as a result of a page move made back in 2006. Contains no significant page history, though if kept it should be retargeted to Queensbury, which is also a DAB page like its current target. CycloneYoris talk! 07:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible typo, I believe typing extra letters into the search bar would show results without the need for a redirect anyway (see Kiingsbury for example). Bonoahx (talk) 11:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reeetarget to Queensbury. Letter replication (typing three of something where two are required) is one of the easier typos to make. BD2412 T 21:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible typo. I think it is very unlikely that someone would type three and not notice and correct. As Bonoahx states, the search function would still get you there, even with four: Showing results for queensbury. No results found for Queeeensbury. MB 15:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Queensbury as plausible typo --Lenticel (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget. MB has a very optimistic view of how people type. That's certainly not how I type, at least. I smash the keys that I think will take me to the page I'm looking for, and if they fail to, I squint at the screen and try to figure out what went wrong. There's no "check work" step before I hit enter. There's a lot of typos I don't think it's worth our trouble to support, but someone hitting e thrice instead of twice is a quite common one, and makes this a plausible redirect. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I can't help but think this a bit British-centric. I don't have the stats to show it, and it really isn't important enough to take the time to find them, but it seems to me that outside of Britain, the most common use of the non typo this is a redirect to (or Proposed to be changed to) is the rules of Boxing at Marquess of Queensberry Rules, not a particular school or marquee. 174.212.211.248 (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an implausible typo with 3 letters in succession. This title lasted for 20 minutes only before the move. Jay (talk) 07:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment It's a highly likely typo since it is a 3-letter-in-succession typo for a 2-letter-in-succession fragment, thus it simply reduplicates one letter in a sequence of multiple identical letters. This kind of typo is abundant on the internet. Short one letter, or an extra letter in such a sequence is a very common form of typo -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Queensbury as a {{R from typo}} -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Consanguinity (in Canon Law)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 28#Consanguinity (in Canon Law)

LDS(automobile)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a weird case. This was a copy-paste of the creator's own article [1] [2]—not an attempt at a cut-and-paste move, just a copy. Redirected 12 hours later, and judging from pageviews is not relied upon by anyone. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Definitely an unusual case, but doesn't seem to serve any purpose. If you typed this in the search box (assuming you're using default settings) it would still bring up the right page. The only way it could really be used would be if you were manually typing in the URL and missed an underscore. 5225C (talk • contributions) 08:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ZS(company)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 07:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo with negligible pageview. Unusually, for this sort, created de novo, not an r from move. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nelson Burton(bowler)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in disambiguator corrected 3 hours after article's creation. Negligible pageviews since. Suggest deletion as with most malformatted disambiguators. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 03:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_20&oldid=1081007219"