Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 10, 2021.

Greek Romance languages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much point in this redirect. To put some context, the Aromanians are a Romance-speaking ethnicity, most of which live in Greece. They are not the only ones however, there also are the Megleno-Romanians, which already brings problems to this redirect as there's no page connecting specifically both groups and their languages. Furthermore, "Greek Romance languages" is not a term to refer to any or both of these languages. It also implies these two languages are some kind of mix between Greek and the Romance languages, or that they have heavy Greek influence (which is true, but we don't call Spanish "Arabic Romance" nor do we call English "French Germanic" for having influences from these languages). I propose deletion of this redirect. Super Ψ Dro 19:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Pointless redirect created in 2006. No such user (talk) 12:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amplia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 18#Amplia

Nashor's tooth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Game trivia not mentioned at the target, delete unless a duly sourced mention can be added to the target. signed, Rosguill talk 16:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Winston (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article's main contributor here. A fluff redirect that has no actual significance and never will—it’s a minor purchasable item within the game. — ImaginesTigers (talkcontribs) 21:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dove vuoi andare oggi?[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLOTE, no particular affinity between the target and Italian. signed, Rosguill talk 16:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree there’s no significant connection to Italy. Windows was not created by an Italian company, the advertising campaign in question was not specifically developed for the Italian market and Italy isn’t even mentioned in the target article.--65.93.194.2 (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know Windows is not created by an Italian company and Microsoft themselves were not from Italy, but there were Windows 95 commercials originally from the United States that have been localized and translated into Italian to promote Windows 95 in Italy. These aforementioned Italian Windows 95 commercials used the Italian translation of the "Where do you want to today?" slogan. DesktopTech2020 (talk) 22:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't think the connection to Italian is quite strong enough to warrant this per WP:RFFL. Wikipedia has formed a consensus that non-English redirects should only be created under certain circumstances, and this one does not meet those. Hog Farm Talk 02:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - subject not related to the Italian language. The fact that it was used in Italian, in Italy, makes the sentence a likely good title for the Italian WP, but says little to nothing about usage at the English WP. - Nabla (talk) 18:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xanthochroi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 12:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not included [anymore]. Hildeoc (talk) 12:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Historical Christ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Historical Jesus. plicit 12:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't a redirect to Historical Jesus be better?. 192.180.91.15 (talk) 11:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trust (law) USA[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 17#Trust (law) USA