Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 28, 2020.

Warworld (Transformers)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation or restoration should this gain a mention somewhere. -- Tavix (talk) 12:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found since it points to a WP:Broken section anchor, but this is not mentioned at the current target or any of its prior targets. -- 2pou (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There has never been a section "Warworld" on List of fictional spacecraft, so the current target is clearly wrong. Retarget to Transformers: Generation 2 (comics) where the craft actually appears. JIP | Talk 20:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I was considering closing this, but I wasn't able to find any mention of Warworld at the proposed topic and am thus uncertain of the suitability of the suggested retarget. signed, Rosguill talk 21:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It does appear in the comic, the Wikipedia article just doesn't mention it. TFWiki has a full article about the ship, which clearly mentions it appears in the comic. JIP | Talk 21:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There are a couple of mentions of "Warworld" in the context of Transformers but singling out one target would be confusing, and a reader is better served by Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bilanggo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Delete unless a duly sourced mention or some other justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete per WP:REDLINK. This is a song by a notable Filipino band called "Rizal Underground" which also has no article at en.wiki. --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as there is now a sourced mention provided in the article. LionFosset (talk) 06:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Working Pearl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only result Google gives me is a poorly-maintained, unsourced, fan-run wiki claiming it was an original title for the episode. I've heard of this rumor before but have never found any proof for it. Scrooge200 (talk) 01:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • But if some people think that, doesn't that make it a plausible search term? Therefore Keep unless there are ambiguity issues. A7V2 (talk) 03:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not mentioned in reliable sources a Wiki is not a reliable source especially since the claim is unsourced and poorly maintained 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand your rationale. By keeping this redirect no-one is claiming that the claim is true, but if, as the nominator suggests, they've "heard of this rumor before" then isn't it plausible that someone would think that's what the episode was called and so search for it and then thanks to the redirect find what they were looking for? A7V2 (talk) 13:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I mean I've only heard it on other wikis, always without a source. This episode is officially called Bossy Boots and it has a title card before the episode, and is called such on online streaming services and TV listings, so I think most people are going to be searching for Bossy Boots instead of Working Pearl. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the history of Bossy Boots it looks like Wikipedia was one of the first places where this appeared back in 2006. And "most people are going to be searching for" is not a reason to delete a redirect. If it was, then that would be 99% of redirects deleted. I've never heard of this before, but certainly just taking a quick look at it it appears to be something which may or may not be true, but definitely is something that some people believe to be true, and so potentially they will search for it (and if it is true that some broadcasters incorrectly used this name then that's what they would search for). WP:RFD reason for not deleting number 5 is "Someone finds them useful". It's definitely plausible that someone might find this useful. A7V2 (talk) 00:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned at the target (or anywhere else), so a reader who follows this link will find no information about it. Narky Blert (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Battle of Horain[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Battle of Horain

Megamaid[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 12:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to refer to anything from this film. Mega Maid is a character mentioned at Spaceballs, albeit a rather minor one. I think that we should either redirect to there or delete the redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 20:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sexual abuse of Aaron Carter[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 10#Sexual abuse of Aaron Carter

Sean Hawk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted as the target page makes no mention of a "Sean Hawk" or "Lieutenant Hawk". —Mahāgaja · talk 13:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Steriruncitruncated 6-demicube[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It can be deleted. Tom Ruen (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Engliſh[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Engliſh

Engish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep --JHunterJ (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo Joseph2302 (talk) 09:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Plausible misspelling. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Come on, it's a plausible misspelling (it's a single letter missing – it's easy to accidentally do)! It's clear that anyone who accidentally types this is trying to get to a page on "English". Also, the search bar isn't the only way to access articles on Wikipedia, fyi. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I can't count how many times I've seen myself and others commit this mistake. It's very plausible. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Englissh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as per Sonic678. The surname variant spelling does appear in Wikipedia. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't need redirect for this Joseph2302 (talk) 09:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Enlish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as misspelling. Just cleaned up two on WP, and there's an indeterminate third candidate from Soling results in 1977. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo Joseph2302 (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom; implausible search term and misspelling. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Come on, it's a plausible misspelling (it's a single letter missing – it's easy to accidentally do)! It's clear that anyone who accidentally types this is trying to get to a page on "English". Also, the search bar isn't the only way to access articles on Wikipedia, fyi. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Englis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate per BD2412. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo Joseph2302 (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Egnlish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misspelling Joseph2302 (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom; implausible search term and misspelling. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Come on, it's a plausible misspelling (it's just two letters swapped – it's easy to accidentally do)! It's clear that anyone who accidentally types this is trying to get to a page on "English". Also, the search bar isn't the only way to access articles on Wikipedia, fyi. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Englilsh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible mis-spelling Joseph2302 (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom; implausible search term and misspelling. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Come on, it's a plausible misspelling, and it's clear that anyone who accidentally types this is trying to get to a page on "English". Also, the search bar isn't the only way to access articles on Wikipedia, fyi. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I wouldn't advocate for creating this if it didn't already exist, but it's been around for 14 years. This hurts nothing, and has the potential to be occassionally helpful. Nothing is to be gained by deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:Redirects are cheap (This comment applies to the preceding six nominations as well). --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hong Kong national security law[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Await outcome of requested move at Talk:National People's Congress Decision on Hong Kong national security legislation#Requested move 23 May 2020. (non-admin closure) P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 05:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The decision, if passed, will not be the HK national security law by itself. HK national security law should be a different independent article after it's passed. 173.68.165.114 (talk) 06:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Euro F3000 Brno[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Auto GP. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These were all created as articles for the 2004 races around June 2009, then converted to redirects July 3rd. Whether the articles themselves are salvagable or not I don't know, but they should have 2004 in the title. And for these redirects it's quite confusing having them target a specific season when most/all of the circuits mentioned hosted the Euro F3000s in other years so someone searching these titles is likely looking for a summary of all the Euro F3000 races at the circuit, so I suggest we delete them. A7V2 (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further comment: Although I would still prefer deletion, I would definitely prefer retargeting to Auto GP than to keep the current target. My reason for deletion though is that they (especially for me, Euro F3000 Brno) come up as a search suggestion when typing in "Euro F3000" which wasn't a redirect until I made it just now, and I was of course very surprised when it took me to the 2004 article but I'm not sure going to Auto GP is that much less surprising. If someone actually wants to specifically find out about the Brno (etc) Euro F3000 races they won't find much at Auto GP. A7V2 (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak redirect all to Auto GP where there's a navbox at the bottom for all the circuits. Alternatively, redirect them to the particular circuit. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget all to Auto GP. There they can navigate themselves to the specific year they may be looking for. I would be opposed to retargeting them to the specific cicuit per WP:RfD#D10.
    SSSB (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Auto GP (which is formerly known as Euro Formula 3000), as per above. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ciryon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Brigandine. I see no opposition to retarget these two redirects to the said new target. I will be retargeting Siryon there as well per AngusWOOF. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 13:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only mention on the Wikipedia is at Brigandine, in the sentence " the King James Version of the Bible [Jeremiah 46:4] translates the Hebrew סריון[1] ÇiRYON or שריון SiRYoN "coat of mail"[2] as "brigandine"" Delete or retarget there, my preference is for deletion given the different accents and capitalization. Hog Farm (talk) 02:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tommyrot[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:tommyrot. signed, Rosguill talk 22:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article, however according to this search, Wikipedia does have many mentioned uses of the word for different reasons. Looks like a dab page should be created. OcelotCreeper (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can we soft redirect to wiktionary on this one? It sounds ripe for use in media, having been used in some books / media, songs, bands AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect to Wiktionary. It's a commonplace word in current use in British English; anyone who wants it to know what it means will find a dictionary definition more useful than an article which doesn't pretend to list synonyms for "nonsense"; it doesn't include e.g. "bollocks", "hogwash" or "piffle" either. There's nothing worthwhile to disambiguate: all we have is namechecks for one or maybe two WP:NN bands (in Glenn Porter and Slapstick (band)) and an art book by Ben Templesmith. Narky Blert (talk) 06:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Three Wikipedia articles mention the band whose name was "Tommyrot", namely Glenn Porter, Slapstick (band), and Thirteenth Step (band). The article on the band here was not AFDed, it was just written over by the redirect and then eliminated.  --Bejnar (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_28&oldid=962008884"