Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 8, 2020.

Make You Dance (Meghan Trainor song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page Make You Dance already redirects to Meghan Trainor discography so this redirect is redundant as there is no primary topic and Make You Dance would become the primary topic not Make You Dance (Meghan Trainor song) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Make You Dance (song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page Make You Dance already redirects to Meghan Trainor discography so this redirect is redundant as there is no primary topic and Make You Dance would become the primary topic not Make You Dance (song) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Standard, harmless and potentially useful {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Correct, a Google search doesn't bring up any other songs with the exact title "Make You Dance". Nothing harmful here. Hog Farm Bacon 01:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Narky Blert (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Notability does not apply to redirects. What matters is whether it is a useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Obvious keep. Not harmful at all. CountyCountry (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Treat Myself, Almost all of Trainor's album tracks on Treat Myself has been redirected to it's parent album page, but not the discography. Trainor has announced that she confirmed her deluxe edition with her single, Make You Dance which will be released tomorrow and it's deluxe edition of her album on July 17. --2600:6C4E:580:A:B1C4:6A15:58AF:AD4B (talk) 20:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pederasty in the Renaissance[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Pederasty in the Renaissance

Pederasty in the modern world[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Pederasty in the modern world

Gloeosporium nervisequum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked by User:Invertzoo with edit summary Mycobank considers Sweetgum anthracnose to be a different species to Sycamore anthracnose. Ost (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Perhaps there is a reliable source for considering them both to be the same species? Invertzoo (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've added a source; MycoBank, actually. Those WP:ESs seem to be about the price of a different species of fish altogether.
Can anyone suggest a good {{R}} tag? {{R from junior synonym}} doesn't exist, and {{R from synonym}} is inappropriate. Narky Blert (talk)
Would {{R from alternative scientific name}} be appropriate? —Ost (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Narky Blert (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rush Hour film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Rush hour (disambiguation)#Film. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improper disambiguation. Besides, there's also Rush Hour (1941 film), Rush Hour (2006 film) and The Rush Hour. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sarkaru Vaari Paata[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep for now. Feel free to ask User:BDD or ask me to do a page history move and the draft article is ready to be moved to this title. Deryck C. 02:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page has no reason to exist as I have already created a draft for this film and it will be ready to go when filming has begun GODUBNATION (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete @Ab207: Can we agree to delete this page as the page is being misused constantly and that we have a draft for this page with everything ready and all we need to do is to add filming when it starts. GODUBNATION (talk) 17:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment @SP013: Is not better to keep redirect to prevent it from being misused? Protecting the redirect may be a better option in that regard WP:REDIRECTPROTECTION. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: The only reason I feel like we need to delete the page is because when we move the draft this page will be in the way of the move and the draft will be stuck. SP013 (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SP013: I think we can merge the content in the draft to this article eventually (with attribution). Is that possible? -- Ab207 (talk) 06:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: I was just going through the moving part of the draft to the title and I saw that it said "Do not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text." So with this reason I say we can delete the article. SP013 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SP013: I see, if that is the case we may consider deletion -- Ab207 (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It would be a shame to lose this article history. Assuming Draft:Sarkaru Vaari Paata is accepted, this page could be moved to Sarkaru Vaari Paata (film) or another acceptable redirect title. In the meantime, the film is at least listed at Parasuram's article. While somewhat unorthodox, I could probably accept moving this to Draft:Sarkaru Vaari Paata (film), though we should remember to move it back to mainspace too if the draft is accepted. --BDD (talk) 20:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dirty Don[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 15#Dirty Don

Agent Orange (Nickname)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Agent Orange (disambiguation)#Politics. signed, Rosguill talk 23:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFD#D3. Momo824 (talk) 06:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cadet Bone Spurs[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 15#Cadet Bone Spurs

Erminia Bianchini[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One of many women to have been the oldest known person in Italy (5 different women have claimed that "title" in just the last 13 months). Just not notable enough for a redirect and given her recent death, likely never will be. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No justification for retaining a redirect to a non-notable person who won't be searched for by anyone except longevity fans who already have more than enough information at Gerontology Wikia. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 07:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Mentioned at the target and there isn't anyone else notable with the name so the redirect is harmless. Thryduulf (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. GiantSnowman 10:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GiantSnowman. pbp 12:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. This Ms. Bianchini has a source by her name talking about her death, and while she may or may not be notable enough to have her own article, she's still worth mentioning on there. Also, notability is not temporary, and the existence of this redirect isn't tied to whether or not she continues to live. Regards, SONIC678 15:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as {{R to list entry}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per all keep !voters above. She's mentioned in the target, supported by a citation to a newspaper. WP:NOTABILITY does not apply to redirects. I'd go further that Thryduulf, and say that this redirect is useful. Narky Blert (talk) 21:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I also agree that this redirect is useful and pageviews have been overwhelmingly high. CycloneYoris talk! 21:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dumitru Comănescu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Provița de Jos. signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned in target article and not notable enough to warrant a redirect elsewhere. Just one of many who claim to be the oldest (fill in the blank). Newshunter12 (talk) 04:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No justification for retaining a redirect to a non-notable person who won't be searched for by anyone except longevity fans who already have more than enough information at Gerontology Wikia. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 07:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Provița de Jos where there is sourced mention of him. There is nobody else notable with this name so a redirect is harmless but information will last longer at the proposed target. Thryduulf (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and update article or retarget as above. GiantSnowman 10:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GiantSnowman. pbp 12:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Provița de Jos. I suspect that updating the list article would not be as easy as it seems. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Thryduulf. That would be a useful redirect. WP:N does not apply to redirects; the test is whether there is useful information at the target. Narky Blert (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Provița de Jos per others above. CycloneYoris talk! 21:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cape Verdean Spanish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content fork of Cape Verdeans in Spain with a confusing title: sounds like a dialect of Spanish. Slashme (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - page has existed since 2007. Unless there is something more confusing going on, it looks like this was the original title of the page, and Cape Verdeans in Spain was just created in June 2020. I don't find it hard to believe that someone looking for information on Cape Verdeans in Spain might look for "Cape Verdean Spanish", as a sort of compound nationality (like Italian American). So, I don't think this does any harm. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:03, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Cape Verdeans unless anyone can find more sources to demonstrate the notability of this specific topic. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article: as El Cid points out, the "content fork" is the other way round, and it's not so much a content-fork as it is a standard cut-and-paste move. Just revert that, and if the title of the article is deemed confusing, then it can be renamed, though I'm not sure this would be a good idea: "Cape Verdeans in Spain" should strictly speaking refer to Cape Verdean citizens who live in Spain, whereas the article is about Spanish citizens who are of Cape Verdean ancestry. Though which of the two is the article actually about? Is either of the two topics notable? – Uanfala (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article per Uanfala. Thryduulf (talk) 20:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article I would say Restore the article to something more reverted. --StaleGuy22 (talk) 05:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mount Washington (Massachusetts)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of peaks named Mount Washington. signed, Rosguill talk 23:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This target might be correct, but the article mentions "Washington Mountain" rather than "Mount Washington", and there is a Mount Washington (Berkshire County, Massachusetts) (which might be the same place), as well as Mount Washington (Middlesex County, Massachusetts), listed at List of peaks named Mount Washington. I would suggest retargeting Mount Washington (Massachusetts) to List of peaks named Mount Washington, and creating Mount Washington (Berkshire County, Massachusetts) to point to October Mountain State Forest if that's geographically correct Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:International Space Station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deryck C. 02:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty ambiguous redirect for those who will use this as an alias of {{ISS modules}}. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. We need not worry about ambiguity as much in template space. Since it's an {{R from move}}, the current template is the better one due to old links and page histories. -- Tavix (talk) 03:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my previous comment. A solution in search of a problem. --BDD (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Samwise Didier[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article without prejudice to AfD signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Was formerly an article that was redirected due to notability and BLP issues. No one good target, as the only mentions on enwiki are at a dab page and brief mentions on a large number of game and album articles stating Didier designed the cover art. Hog Farm Bacon 02:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article and send to AfD. RfD should not be used to determine the notability or otherwise of article subjects. Thryduulf (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

German Christians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close because German Christians is not a redirect. The RM would have to conclude in favor of a move first. Sometimes during the course of an RM discussion consensus becomes clear on what to do with the resulting redirect, but if not, an RfD can be initiated after it's closed to figure that out. -- Tavix (talk) 13:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is related to recent RM on [movement's talk page], should it be redirected to that movement, or retarget it to Religion in Germany#Christianity. 182.1.63.118 (talk) 00:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_8&oldid=969463174"