Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 13, 2019.

C6H1206[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C6H1206 was created by mistake: formula of Glucose is C6H12O6 not C6H1206. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C6H1206. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 22:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C16H19N2O9S2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 22#C16H19N2O9S2

C25H45N5O[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C25H45N5O was created by mistake: formula of Glatiramer acetate is C25H45N5O13. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C25H45N5O. I propose to delete it. (C25H45N5O13 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 21:40, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

July-August 2019 European heat wave[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. August is turning out to be colder than average - at least here in Blackpool. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the heat wave went into August. Interstellarity (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C5H3Cl2O2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7. I created this in error, as described. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C5H3Cl2O2 was created by mistake: formula of 2-Furoyl chloride is …Cl… not …Cl2…. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C5H3Cl2O2. I propose to delete it. (C5H3ClO2 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parque de María Luisa (park)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 22#Parque de María Luisa (park)

C16H21N2O[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C16H21N2O was created by mistake: formula of Fumigaclavine B is …H20… not …H21…. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C16H21N2O. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

God Church[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to RiceGum. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Way too vague, not primarily associated with the target signed, Rosguill talk 14:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The other song may be notable, but that hasn't been demonstrated. --BDD (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or retarget to RiceGum, as he is the creator of the song and "God Church" is mentioned in the RiceGum article. –Sonicwave talk 23:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to RiceGum. Good enough for me. --BDD (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biography of thomas edison[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Added by LaundryPizza03 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unhelpful redirect. Not the stuff of redirect titles. Biography of thomas edison has history, but was not merged, merely redirected. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: All but the first four of the redirects in the "Added by LaundryPizza03 (talk · contribs)" section were all tagged with the wrong date, which causes links from those redirects to forward to the wrong day's subpage. This has now been resolved, so any readers looking up these terms will be forwarded appropriately.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep those with history to avoid breaking incoming links. Neutral on whether to delete the rest as I don't really see the harm. Wug·a·po·des​ 00:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jordan,Michael[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. If deletion is still believed to be warranted for these redirects, it may be more appropriate to discuss them individually or in smaller groups. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Errors in {{R from sort name}}. Not in accord with the purpose of sort names, since their purpose is for print and these are unprintworthy. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 9#Rodham,Hillary. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all except Michael Jordan, as the missing space after the comma is implausible. These are harmless and absolutely unambiguous; there's no benefit to deletion; this is definitely not a sort error. Plus, what kind of redirect that's meant for print is unprintworthy? Trump Donald had 82 hits in the last few months, including ten in one day; that's 82 people whose requests would have been complicated by this deletion. It's distinctly not implausible that someone would simply leave off a comma. Nyttend (talk) 21:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Playing devil's advocate, Jordan's gets more page views than Alighieri's, but that one is not "plausible"? Seems we needs a different criteria than views, hence, I !voted delete all below.—Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. Not good for business to make an issue. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all All of the above have the equivalent "<last name>, <first name>" redirect now (I went and created Dalí, Salvador). If the above are deleted, they won't show up in autocomplete search suggestions, and readers will select the remaining "correct" entry. For the few that still press return, they will learn and adjust. Expecting a comma or selection of a valid suggestion is not rocket science. There's all sorts of other WP:BEANS redirect examples that if we allowed them to be created, someone would select them and they would get traffic. WP:IAR, and let's not go there.—Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting. I was discussing recently with a friend whether he had a name for the anti-pattern, where someone argues in terms suggesting it is possible to know how people search/should search. He said, no, he didn't know what it is called, but it is very common. And here it is. Given that WP:RPURPOSE starts with 20 bullets, I don't think the WP:BEANS reference appropriate. We know that there are more redirects than articles, they are not resource-intensive, and discussions about those that can serve a purpose is a time-sink. Look, why do you take as a premise that people search using the box? I'm just as likely to use a Google custom search. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    People that use Google are not affected by Wikipedia's redirects. BEANS was in reference to all sorts of typos that could be churned out, such as this missing space after comma one. It was not alluding to guideline RPURPOSE. They can and do co-exist, just not always in black and white terms.—Bagumba (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Framing this as a trade-off, it seems to be common ground that some traffic to articles would be lost, and what is to be weighed against that is simply some untidiness. I know where I stand on that one. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment FWIW, the RfD mentioned in the nom re: Rodham,Hillary, i.e. malformed sort name, was closed as "delete".—Bagumba (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Reagan Ronald. and probably delete the rest. I'm just here because article alerts. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. A couple of these have been discussed before, which I have listed in the {{old rfd list}}. I'll defer to my arguments at both discussions, but especially Beckham David because I went into quite a bit of detail there. -- Tavix (talk) 20:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all per Tavix. The argument that people who use Google are unaffected by Wikipedia redirects is just plain false - google indexes redirects and uses them to asist with provding search results. Thryduulf (talk) 09:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Explains why Google's search engine prowess is on par with Wikipedia's.—Bagumba (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Per WP:PANDORA and the fact that the search function will send people there regardless.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Las Blancas[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 27#Las Blancas

Frontier Village Amphitheatre[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From reading the target article, while the World's Largest Buffalo is located at the Frontier Village, there's no mention in the article, nor any indication that it should be mentioned in the article. I would suggest deletion unless someone can provide a justification for the redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 17:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Good Marriage[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that the only subject at the target disambiguation page that is specifically called "The Good Marriage" is Le Beau Mariage. For that reason, this redirect should be retargeted there. Steel1943 (talk) 04:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nominator. Geolodus (talk) 16:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget but leave a hatnote. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 00:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The book is titled The Good Marriage: How and Why Love Lasts, so that could be abbreviated to The Good Marriage, especially given how many non-fiction books use the short title followed by some long subtitle. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget While the book is titled the good marriage we don’t have an article for it whereas we do for the other entry.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 16:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C19H19O6[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C19H19O6 was created by mistake: formula of Folate is C19H19N7O6. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C19H19O6. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Practically a G8 at this point. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article has recently been created about this person at Deepak Singhal (banker). This redirect could be updated to take the reader to the new article. However I think that the two titles are too similar, and it would be better to delete the redirect entirely. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite confused, Steel1943 has moved this to Deepak Singhal, RBI which seems to be against the MOS naming but also now suppressed the redirect, so I'm all kinds of confused. It seems highly unlikely someone is going to be searching for this term and would encourage it to be moved back while this RFD takes place at the very least as well as consider just redirecting the article requested here as it's all WP:MILL and just restore both to direct to Reserve Bank of India. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: See here. The nominator literally created the page they proposed for deletion. If anyone wishes to nominate Deepak Singhal, RBI for deletion, they are free to do so. Also, note that in my redirect suppression, the history contains the phrase "over a redirect"; the nominator moved the redirect Deepak Singhal, RBI to Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India), resulting in two redirects, including the former redirecting to the latter, which was never resolved by the editor or a bot since the {{RfD}} tag placed on Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India) technically converted it into a non-redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The move was correct by CSC, the tag should remain despite your moving of the redirect, Steel1943. Please stop wheel warring and revert your last removal. Praxidicae (talk) 15:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: Not "wheel-warring", whatever that is (though I have heard that phrase before.) Either way, the tag you restored is still technically on a redirect that has not been nominated or included in a nomination. As I stated on my talk page, give me a few minutes and I think I'll have a resolution good for the parties involved. Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943: For your convenience: WP:WHEEL. –MJL ‐Talk‐🍰 15:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MJL: Thanks for that link. That's an interesting concept that I could totally see happening, or even how this was construed as so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India) restored and tagged, and Deepak Singhal, RBI merged into this discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
...And also, swapped the edit histories per what I presume was the nominator's intent, plus the comment regarding proper title disambiguation by Praxidicae. (When I made the previous comments, the {{RfD}} tag was on Deepak Singhal, RBI, but that edit history has now been moved back to Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India).) Steel1943 (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C13H20N20O3S[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C13H20N20O3S was created by mistake: formula of Etozolin is …N2… not …N20…. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C13H20N20O3S. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 08:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C11H12O[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C11H12O was created by mistake: formula of Ethyl cinnamate is C11H12O2. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C11H12O. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C2H9N2O3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C2H9N2O3 was created by mistake: formula of Ethylammonium nitrate is …H8… not …H9…. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C2H9N2O3. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Star Wars spaceship redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional vehicles that don't appear to be covered in the target article. Also vague names that can probably refer to other things. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete the first 2 especially are very vague and could be confused for real military vehicles.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it is confusing and likely to make navigation harder. Alternatively, retarget to Gunboat and Frigate, though probably not the best solution for the Mk. II one. Wug·a·po·des​ 00:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Admiral Watkins[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 22#Admiral Watkins

K.G.F: Chapter 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No reason for deletion was provided. (non-admin closure) Jalen D. Folf (talk) 05:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A17NAN 03:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@A17nan: are you proposing for this redirect to be deleted or retargeted to a different article, and for what reason? If this is being proposed for deletion, then I'd say keep since the stats indicate that this is a high-usage redirect (37,000+ views in the last 30 days). –Sonicwave talk 05:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hardup , Utah[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, a misplaced comma? Onel5969 TT me 02:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is an example of a WP:UNNATURAL mistake; it is rather unlikely that there would be an extra space before the comma. ComplexRational (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel (talk) 03:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shakira Law[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural listing. This redirect was nominated for speedy deletion by User:Deacon Vorbis as an improbable typo, but it's not a recently-created redirect. Bringing it here for a full discussion. - Eureka Lott 01:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Thanks for the ping; reaffirming my reasoning as implausible (if not a little funny at least). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Implausible indeed; almost seems like a joke redirect. Geolodus (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?" "No problem." --BDD (talk) 23:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This isn't actually as implausible as it seems, there was a popular internet meme in late 2017, around when this redirect was created, which started from an alleged typo on twitter. See, for example, the responses to this mistake from then-representative-elect Ilhan Omar [1]. Wug·a·po·des​ 00:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is it serving, though? Do we discuss the meme anywhere? Do we expect many readers earnestly typing "Shakira Law" when looking for sharia? --BDD (talk) 02:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I ROFL'd, but this seems like an implausible misunderstanding at best.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Funny, but not a plausible error. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_13&oldid=912801434"