Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 10, 2017.

List of Soviet Cold War power plays[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a list of Soviet actions labeled as such at the target article. This was formerly an article during Wikipedia's "wild west" days, but was redirected as a violation of NPOV. -- Tavix (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both -- POV names of unknown encyclopedic value. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom. Soviet power plays sounds like something from ice hockey. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I knew these looked familiar. I nominated the American equivalents for deletion a while back. --BDD (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the link! When I was going through the redirects to Cold War, they seemed familiar to me too but I couldn't figure out why. I shrugged it off and concluded I must've already looked though the Cold War redirects some time ago and didn't take action on them. -- Tavix (talk) 20:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cold War:Part 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. - Nabla (talk) 14:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Cold War III (below), this isn't a term that's used to describe anything noteworthy. -- Tavix (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency. However, MOS:DATERANGE prefers the full four digit years, so I've moved them accordingly. -- Tavix (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that works. Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as vague as there are media such as Cold War Part 1: From World War to Cold War [1] and CNN Cold War episode 1 [2] Cold War Part 1: 1945-1961 documentary from Phil Sheppard [3] All these use ranges different from the first "period" as separated by the Wikipedia articles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cold War III[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Looks like cold war II is not hot yet, so cold war III is crystalballing - Nabla (talk) 14:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found search results showing the book called Cold War III. However, the book is not notable. Neither is some boxing fight. Also, I could not find any other potentially notable topic using "Cold War III". Unsure about the upcoming sequel to Cold War 2 (film), but I've not seen yet filming reports. As is, the page redirects to "Cold war (general term)", but it may potentially violate WP:NOTCRYSTAL as almost no source speculates or fears "Cold War III" or uses it as a term. George Ho (talk) 06:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hhtp[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 19#Hhtp

Zarna Joshi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This BLP had a run in with Rudy Pantoja/"Hugh Mungus" a year ago - The article currently redirects to h3h3 productions however she has no relation to that nor is she mentioned in the h3h3 article, IMHO a pointless redirect, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tschad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Tschad, delete Tsjad. -- Tavix (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. Chad has connections to Arabic, French, and indigenous languages, but not to German or Afrikaans/Norwegian. --BDD (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the first one, since it seems like a reasonable, but confused combination, of the Arabic and French transliterations (Tshad/Tchad). delete the second one per nom. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I do not recall what lead me to create the Tschad redirect, but it could have been the reference in Blepharopsis mendica, or something similar. I'm fairly certain I didn't accidentally concoct this misspelling. ke4roh (talk) 19:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Strange that it would come up there. The zoologist who named it was Danish, not German, but their spellings for Chad are just one letter off, and the Danish may well have changed since his day. --BDD (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm inclined to think the first one should be kept, if for no other reason than the fact of there being so much scholarship on the area (as almost everywhere else) that is in German. – Uanfala 22:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. the first, as suggested. I don;t see any basis for the second. DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beat Up[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate, without quorum for a strong consensus. However, any issues with the existence of the dab page should be handled at WP:AFD. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala 14:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this band should get a monopoly on this term, especially since Beat up is red and the default Wikipedia searcher will automatically redirect to Beat Up.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  03:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that the song by The Toasters might be a non-notable single. There is cover art for the single, but it hasn't charted or been added to any albums or even mentioned in collections like Spotify. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There was an AfD in 2013 that might be of interest to you: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Up. -- Tavix (talk) 19:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_10&oldid=1088106336"