Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 26, 2017.

Squirrel-sponsored cyberterrorism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Default to keep. Deryck C. 14:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious joke. KMF (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep it was obvioudly not a joke, it was the actual original title of the article and the concept is thoroughly discussed there. Nominator presents no other case to answer. Ribbet32 (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Enigmamsg 03:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It is true that squirrels can disrupt a power grid or computer network. But they are not sponsoring terrorism. The term is obviously humorous, but it's not up to us to create and propagate it. - Richard Cavell (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the word "sponsored" is what is inaccurate. Squirrels don't sponsor any such activities, nor are deployed to do as such. Original article was created on June 6. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — This was the original title of the article, but is not likely to be a useful/plausible redirect in the long term. —PaleoNeonate - 18:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not a joke, I think, but the redirect isn't plausible. As others said, it's not cyberterrorism and it isn't "sponsored" by squirrels. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Although this is a phrase that doesn't get many ghits, it was the article's title for 19 days until a move executed a week ago, and there are incoming external links [1]. – Uanfala 08:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, so long as the article continues to make reference to such: Squirrels mobilize, plot acts of cyber terrorism against humankind - And they're not acting alone. -- Tavix (talk) 20:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Owen Vaccaro[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect was blanked by Albertod4 with the rationale "Owen Vaccaro should not redirect to Daddy's Home. He's been in other films (e.g., Mother's Day)". Since the blanking was obviously improper, I'm taking it here for them. Unless I comment otherwise, I'm neutral. -- Tavix (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete actor is not strongly tied to this film. Should Owen meet notability later, an article can be created. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per AngusWOOF, non-notable actor who has now appeared in more than one film. Sro23 (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Compulsive Wikipedia Editing Syndrome[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, seems to be WP:MADEUP in order to make the user template {{User CWES}}. I'd like to see all links removed rather than piped to Obsessive–compulsive disorder as I don't think it's appropriate to connect a made-up "syndrome" with a serious mental disorder. -- Tavix (talk) 18:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego online game[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 22#Lego online game

Human disturbance[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 8#Human disturbance

Anthropogenic effect[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 8#Anthropogenic effect

Young Vitruvius[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete and retarget to List of characters in The Lego Movie#Princess Unikitty, respectively. -- Tavix (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:GAMEGUIDE, or else it could easily link to The Lego Movie, or a respective character list, if there is. Lordtobi (✉) 20:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If Vitruvius as a child is a significant character (starring voice role), then Retarget, but if it's just a brief or passing flashback, then forget it. Also there is a Vitruvius historical figure. I don't see a young version in The Lego Movie. [2] Also note the voices aren't confirmed in the video game only the movie itself [3] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it will be notable for the companion video game, so recommend delete on Young Vitruvius. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego indy 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 19:57, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely search term. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LGBT liberal politics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There's a disagreement as to where this would be retargeted, and a majority in favour of deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect does not make sense and there does not seem to be an appropriate target available. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pointing "liberal" to "conservative" without a clear explanation at the target is astonishing. Deryck C. 14:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Irish tea shop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There's been a lot of chatter regarding potentially retargeting this and covering it somewhere, but it appears that hasn't happen. As such, I'm closing this without prejudice against recreation if the term is to be sourced somewhere. -- Tavix (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps at least some people using this redirect may be disappointed when they are redirected to a political article instead of one about tea? What's the likelihood of this being a real spelling error? AmaryllisGardener talk 00:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Taldren[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Terms do not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep seems to be an affiliated developer for the series. [5] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Developer actually made at least three of these games according to MobyGames. Per Angus' link, another unrelated game was in development hell before getting canceled. Perhaps delete to encourage article creation? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. I'm not 100% convinced that this company is notable, though I wouldn't be opposed to keeping this redirect if info about the company was added to the target article. FYI, Taldren, Inc. is a redirect that sends readers to the same article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Maroz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete under G7. ℯxplicit 07:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page created by error Hergilei (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Average Call Hold Time[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 5#Average Call Hold Time

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_26&oldid=1138581768"