Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 13, 2017.

'Kamen Rider × Kamen Rider Wizard & Fourze: Movie War Ultimatum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No need for the redirect with the ' at the head of the title. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete this appears to be a typo in creation that was corrected shortly afterwards. The ' is not part of the title.AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as improbable misspelling, it's probably a missed formatting edit (italics?) --Lenticel (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per the above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Medieval Asia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to History_of_Asia#Medieval_history. Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redirects to an article that is not about Asia at all. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This originally redirected to an Asia section in the Middle Ages, but it doesn't exist anymore. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

@midnight (Twitter)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 10:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary. Not surprisingly, @midnight is the Twitter handle for the show, but someone typing @midnight will get where they need to go, and is very unlikely to add the parenthetical (Twitter). UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this is a notable show, not a twitter channel. If the twitter handle was what resulted in the TV show, then it can be retained, but it is more likely the other way around based on the article itself. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Was going to ask the editor who created the category and the rcat back in 2013 to make a showing, but it seems they are more or less retired. So, with no one to track and/or maintain them, I can no longer speak to the usefulness of any of these Twitter redirects.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  10:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Hey Paine, caught your paper trail (I really need to disable my notifications to my email). Anyways, I agree with the nominative since "Twitter" is an unclear disambiguator at this time, and the target article is not a Twitter account. I created the respective category for Twitter usernames, but since "@midnight (Twitter)" is not the target article's Twitter hashtag (including the "(Twitter)"), it could potentially be considered misleading as a redirect. Cheers! Steel1943 (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I should probably clarify: If the subject at the title @midnight represented a different subject than what the Twitter username "@midnight" represents (like if the nominated redirect targeted "Luxury Berg Enterprises", I could see a need for this redirect to exist. However, at the present time, unless the aforementioned situation exists for at least one such other {{R from Twitter username}} redirect, I stand by this. (However, if I am proven otherwise during the course of this discussion, consider my "delete" withdrawn.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FC Fcsb[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. The questions has been reduced to the plausibility of this particular capitalisation variant. Further discussions is unlikely to move in a "delete" direction, and relisting it to allow a shift towards "keep" or a clearer "no consensus" isn't worth the community's time given the effective indistinguishability of these two outcomes. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala 11:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

obscure collection of letters that may or may not refer to the target - just confusing and not a useful search term PRehse (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch - nothing like choosing an impossible name. Not sure what to do here. My gut feeling is to delete the redirect (inaccurate capitalizations) and move the current target article to the new name.PRehse (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A WP:RM was made on the article talkpage and resulted in "No move" so a move would be controversial and needs to be discussed first. Qed237 (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Messy.PRehse (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does renaming this redirect to FC FCSB make it disappear from search for "fc fcsb"? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No (says someone who hates clusters of redirects with capitalization variations).PRehse (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then, let's Move to FC FCSB / Delete mixed caps version. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per AngusWOOF. I've created the CAPS version as both are plausible. -- Tavix (talk) 03:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_13&oldid=1138581634"