Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 September 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 27, 2013.

Trufflegate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quick research indicates that this indeed refers to an incident associated with M.I.A., but it's not one that's mentioned in the target article, and with good reason. It appears to be a very minor journalistic controversy. With no incoming links, deletion is a safe option. BDD (talk) 23:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - not mentioned in the article so would be confusing to the reader. No obvious retarget presents itself. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Sorry, I don't see anything that would confuse anybody, least of whom the contributor who created this redirect three years ago to perhaps link to it from an external website. There is no telling how many more have "borrowed" that link for their own websites. This is a notable rapper, isn't she? Redirects to her article do not have to be notable. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 02:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not mentioned at target so is misleading and frustrating to anyone searching for this topic. Siuenti (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flight 93[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Flight 93 isn't a redirect. To accomplish what you're proposing, put a requested move on the talk page requesting a move to Flight 93 (disambiguation) and state that you'd like to have the base title redirect to United Airlines Flight 93. --BDD (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United Airlines Flight 93 is pretty clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Page views for United Airlines Flight 93 easily dwarf those for Pan Am Flight 93, which is only a section and not its own article. The rest of the articles listed are all related to United Airlines Flight 93. "Flight 93" should be redirected to United Airlines Flight 93, and a separate disambiguation page Flight 93 (disambiguation) should be linked from the top of the article. Instaurare (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2C-H[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. You'll also want to go through WP:RM for this. --BDD (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per reasons at Talk:2C–H#Page move?, 2C-H (hyphenated) should be removed so 2C–H (endashed) can be moved to 2C-H (hyphenated), which is the correct title for the article. Original objector has not responded in 2 weeks, nor has anyone else commented at Wikipedia Talk:Naming conventions (chemistry)#2C-H. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 21:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.