Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 October 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 26, 2011

File:PICT3902.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:ZEQE0027.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name. Have removed all links to original name. Nikthestoned 16:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete - Page was created today and was is an uncontroversial move from a simple mistake. This can/should be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G7 and WP:CSD#G6. —mako๛ 16:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I misread the edit history. Let me try again. :) —mako๛ 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:ZEQE0050.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name. Have removed all links to original name. Nikthestoned 16:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete - Page was created today and was is an uncontroversial move from a simple mistake requested by the author. This can/should be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G7 or WP:CSD#G6.—mako๛ 16:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I misread the edit history. Let me try again. :) —mako๛ 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:S7301225.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly a retitle from a procedural name, All usage updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I felt that the file did not follow naming conventions and hence I redirected it. If you feel that the file should not be redirected, please feel free to undo it.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 16:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - Page was created today and was is an uncontroversial move from a simple mistake. This can/should be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G6 and, because the creator has requested it, also WP:CSD#G7. These don't need to come to RFD. —mako๛ 16:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On second reading, I think it's not quite far to say that this was request to have the redirect deleted. But it can still be speedied under WP:CSD#G6. —mako๛ 17:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I misread the edit history. Let me try again. :) —mako๛ 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3447.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3462.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3750small.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anser serrirostris (genus)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing this page was made by mistake (species names are two words, genus names one, so the name doesn't mean anything): it's very unlikely to be used, though it has for some time been linked at Anser (bird), and I just removed its link there. (Anser serrirostris is the species name of the Bean Goose; the genus is Anser, and there is no need for disambiguation anything like this.) —innotata 15:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It should probably be deleted per reasoning above....Pvmoutside (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Genda Shigyo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would have speedied but unsure of criteria. This redirect is not useful as it makes it appear that this (notable) company has a page when it does not. The entry in the list this redirects to for this company contains no further information other than the age of the company however a redlink would be more use. Nikthestoned 14:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I can't find any sources that would back up notability. Having said that, I fully acknowledge that searching in English is hardly definitive for a Japanese company. If reliable sources can be produced that would support a full article then I will happily change by suggested action. Meanwhile, the present target does include useful information and the redirect is, therefore, doing its job. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per Bridgeplayer. A lack of sources for the page would suggest that it is better to keep it as a redirect for now - which in no way prevents a good editor from making it into an article. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 3045.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nom. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 3085.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural filename, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nom. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3367.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3343.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3339.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT3124.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2479.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or All usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT4638.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT4875.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No Usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT4886.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usages updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT6870 Connector 1.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT6872 Connector 2.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2562.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all relevant usage updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2556.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all usage updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2532.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, No usage or all relevant usage updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2454.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, no usage or all relevant usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2439.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name, unused or all relevant usage updated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:PICT2409.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural retitle, Usage seemingly updated or redirect not in use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Zoom!.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free retitled image, Relevant usages (in article space) updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Zoon.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free retitle, Usages updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 6403.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural name Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 6410.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural filename. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 4119.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle from procedural filename. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per G6: Non-controversial procedural and housekeeping deletion. Just mind any potential transclusion; one never knows unless one checks. Fleet Command (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete all per G6 per Fleet Command. Thryduulf (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Glomp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wiktionary. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to a page that does not discuss it, no incoming links. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:^_^. I mean, per having no valid target. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect to Wiktionary which would be a fine use of a soft redirect. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect to Wiktionary. The five AfDs for this article and 400+ hits/month show both that this is a title that should not be a redlink and that there is nothing encyclopaedic but plenty dictionaric that can be said about "glomp"/"glomping". Soft redirects are the perfect solution for situations like this. Thryduulf (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_26&oldid=1136448431"