Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 27, 2010

Whaddya think of my new suit!?[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an implausible and confusing search term that is not mentioned in the target. 86.156.83.96 (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Implausible search term. Uncle Dick (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Implausible and unusual search term. 24.151.113.86 (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no legitimate reason for this redirect. Not a likely search term, not mentioned in the target article. --Kinu t/c 07:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unlikely search term, no incoming links other then RFD and the creator's talk. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Painting/failed article "Painter"[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD G6 by Anthony Appleyard. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unlikely search term, to say the least. bd2412 T 03:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as G6 and tagged as housekeeping - artefact leftover after page merge. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Pick/old version[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to subpage of talk without new redirect. Title is moving to Talk:Pickaxe/Old version. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently made to preserve edit history. Merge history to pick without a resulting redirect. bd2412 T 03:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Move to subpage of Talk:Pickaxe (not Pick) and delete the resulting redirect. It turns out that this is a case of Wikipedia:Parallel versions. This action will preserve the history whilst ridding us of a pointless redirect. A new link should be created from the comment at Talk:Pickaxe. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep after moving, but don't delete the redirect: I suspect that an edit summary somewhere will reference this link. Time to ignore this rule, because attribution is more important than deleting odd redirects. Nyttend (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think linking from an edit summary is reason enough to keep the redirect. There are countless red links in edit summaries, from pages deleted through XfD processes, through moves without redirects, even through typos in writing out the link in the summary. bd2412 T 00:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Palestine/Archive 1[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD G6 by Anthony Appleyard. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Apparent leftovers from page moves. bd2412 T 03:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete all as G6 and tagged as such. This is simply administrative housekeeping. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WA,adysA,aw IV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but slowly, this is not nonsense: it's mojibake. We really don't need redirects from mojibake titles, but it's not on the level of something like j7efb4sio7suf9br dhsifsub. Nyttend (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete promtly. Mojibake is nonsense. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WA,adysA,aw IV Waza[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but slowly, this is not nonsense: it's mojibake. We really don't need redirects from mojibake titles, but it's not on the level of something like j7efb4sio7suf9br dhsifsub. Nyttend (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete promtly. Mojibake is nonsense. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Władysław IV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but slowly, this is neither bot created nor nonsense: it's mojibake. We really don't need redirects from mojibake titles, but it's not on the level of something like j7efb4sio7suf9br dhsifsub. Nyttend (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete promtly. Mojibake is nonsense. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

PiA,awa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD R3 by RHaworth. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. 15:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Władysław IV Waza[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD R3 by RHaworth. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Piława[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD R3 by RHaworth. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense characters. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 and tagged as such. Bot created gibberish. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

HP_ProLiant[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargeted. Uncontroversial retargeting. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current redirect points to brand instead of actual product. Would be better if this was fixed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bacturin (talkcontribs) 02:45, 27 August 2010

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.