Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 December 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < December 7 | December 9 > |
|---|
December 8
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, now tagged as non-free, no longer eligible for deletion in this venue. — ξxplicit 02:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cartoon kit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Product art not likely the property of the uploader as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, now tagged as non-free, no longer eligible for deletion in this venue. — ξxplicit 02:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Talltraptitle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be an image from a cartoon. Eeekster (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, now tagged as non-free, no longer eligible for deletion in this venue. — ξxplicit 02:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SorrySafari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cartoon title card. Eeekster (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. WP:ICTIC: "license must not prevent commercial reuse or derivative works." — ξxplicit 02:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mary Kiffmeyer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Violates WP:IUP. The State of Minnesota (including the Secretary of State) allows for free use but specifically forbids use for commercial purposes. [1] Gobōnobō + c 01:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wikipedia is not commerical. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reason for public domain claim is invalid. Eeekster (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Uploader probably assumed {{PD-USGov}} applied. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Most states do not make employee works PD. Eeekster (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As above, uploader probably assumed {{PD-USGov}} applied. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Arun Khetarpal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording given on the Indian Army website http://www.indianarmy.gov.in/Site/FormTemplete/frmTempSimple.aspx?MnId=8ljh5YmYE9B6y1h2yFg77w==&ParentID=014h+/WanyNUGuDaqorvVQ== does not allow unrestricted re-use of the image. NtheP (talk) 12:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eric Boullier 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unfree image of a living subject, not otherwise exempt from the usual prohibition on such images. Pyrope 20:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close wrong venue, use WP:FFD -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy keep - as falling below the threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 1) False source info provided, actually sourced here; 2) Not low resolution; 3) Not specific to the subject of the article (a generic logo rather than specific to Honda's F1 team) therefore fails to identify subject of the article. Pyrope 21:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Pyrope 22:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Actually, scratch that, looking at the wasteland that WP:Non-free content review seems to be it is very plain that route is a pointless waste of my time. This nomination stands here. It is a possibly unfree file listed at WP:Possibly unfree files. For the anally retentive splitters amongst the Wikipedia admin population, please take this as a prime example of what happens if you continually subdivide issues into smaller and smaller blocks, and pass the buck accordingly. Not impressed. Pyrope 22:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close this is indicated per bot as non-free. Go to WP:FFD -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy "I can't be arsed with this any more" this user is indicated per salary as "volunteer" and not "staff". If Wikipedia wants to start paying me then I'll start jumping through the arcane bullshit hoops that seem to have been set up all over the deletion process (have you seen WP:FFD's "What not to list here"??), but until then I don't care enough if Wikipedia gets sued for using copyrighted materials. Come back to me when there is a more logical, simple and straightforward method for highlighting blatant copyvios posted by lying cretins. Pyrope 09:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bedford Institute of Oceanography.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No source, nor explanation of why it is GFDL. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Here is the properly sourced coat of arms. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This image is also valid for the coat of arms: [2], but it won't be GFDL, obviously, so would have to be converted to fair use (with a new source location) and used somewhere within the article if it is to be kept. Resolute 15:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- convert to fair use and rename to "coat of arms" instead of "crest" -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fair use doesn't apply to unused images. Besides, coats of arms appear to fail WP:NFCC#1 (see Commons:COM:COA#Public domain definition (blason)). --Stefan2 (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it can and should be used in the Charlottetown article. If this is public domain, as is claimed on your Commons link, then there's no problem keeping it at all. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 05:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See above nominations. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this is completely unclear. there are many "above nominations" with your name attached to them and different reasoning in them. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Magog refers to the nom immediately above: "No source, nor explanation of why it is GFDL.", though yes, copy-pasting that might have been a little more clearer. As to the file, if it did come from the CGC website, then it is very unlikely to be both PD and GFDL, which the uploader stated. It will be under copyright, and while the government has granted permission to copy for non-commercial use, that is incompatible with Wikipedia's image policy. I am struggling to think of a good fair use reason to keep the image, so must regretfully suggest deletion. Resolute 15:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.