Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 August 16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
August 16[edit]
File:Shakib Khan.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shakib Khan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Google image search shows this file to be from http://www.shaptahik-2000.com/category/recreation/page/17/ but the page has changed since it was last spidered. Eeekster (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Priya Amar Priya.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Priya Amar Priya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Video CD cover unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:DevDas.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DevDas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Amar Praner Priya.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amar Praner Priya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cover or poster not likely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Amar Praner Priya soundtrack.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Amar Praner Priya1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amar Praner Priya1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Andrei Sidyuck.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Andrei Sidyuck.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source says "Использование материалов Сегодня разрешается при условии ссылки (для интернет-изданий - гиперссылки) на Сегодня." - this is not the same as allowing any and all use. It is basically the same thing that we had with Kremlin.ru materials a couple of years ago. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs in Court 2.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The source says "Использование материалов Сегодня разрешается при условии ссылки (для интернет-изданий - гиперссылки) на Сегодня." - this is not the same as allowing any and all use. It is basically the same thing that we had with Kremlin.ru materials a couple of years ago. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not an expert on Ukrainian copyright law, but would express concern if original research or conjecture has been used to tag this image (and the others here with similar tags). Assuming that User:Flyboy Will knew what he was doing when uploading the image should be the default position unless there is clear evidence to the contrary. This relates to Ukraine, not Russia.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs Arrest.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The source states "Все права на материалы, находящиеся на сайте NEWSru.ua, охраняются в соответствии с законодательством, в том числе, об авторском праве и смежных правах. При любом использовании материалов и новостей сайта гиперссылка на NEWSru.ua обязательна." NEWSru is affirming their copyright claims, and allows use with a hyperlink - this is the same problem we had with Kremlin.ru a few years ago, in that it does not explicitly allow ANY use, including creation of derivative works, etc Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs in Court.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The link is no longer available, but given the other links, it is likely the same conditions as the 3 previous nominations. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sayenko and Suprunyuck with Dead Cat Mosaic.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The source says "Использование материалов Сегодня разрешается при условии ссылки (для интернет-изданий - гиперссылки) на Сегодня." - this is not the same as allowing any and all use. It is basically the same thing that we had with Kremlin.ru materials a couple of years ago. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This particular image is a piece of court evidence, not a press photo. It was taken by the killers after they had tortured a cat to death. Copyright considerations would not apply unless the killers complained, which is unlikely. The blurring is to prevent the image from being offensive, the unblurred image is too disturbing to show. This image should be OK if it is retagged.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The photo was obviously taken by the killers themselves, and it is claimed that the photo was used as court evidence, and then we have a news source stating "Использование материалов Сегодня разрешается при условии ссылки (для интернет-изданий - гиперссылки) на Сегодня.", and then we have a Wikipedia editor uploading with the belief that Segodnya are the copyright holders. The copyright holders are the killers themselves, and it isn't a good enough reason to say that its alright unless they complain. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 14:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This particular image is a piece of court evidence, not a press photo. It was taken by the killers after they had tortured a cat to death. Copyright considerations would not apply unless the killers complained, which is unlikely. The blurring is to prevent the image from being offensive, the unblurred image is too disturbing to show. This image should be OK if it is retagged.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Segodnya claim is easy to disregard. The photo was obviously taken by the killers, and the image needs to be retagged.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: Are you really saying that the killers are going to complain from prison, saying: "You are not allowed to show me torturing a cat to death under WP:NFCC without my prior permission?"--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- But that is the problem. The photos aren't being used under a WP:NFCC rationale, but under the claim that they can be used in anyway with attribution, and that attribution going to the news website. Any images which are used under WP:NFCC need to have clear rationale supporting the use of the image, and their use in articles should be limited; i.e. it would generally be unacceptable to have multiple photos in articles. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 08:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: Are you really saying that the killers are going to complain from prison, saying: "You are not allowed to show me torturing a cat to death under WP:NFCC without my prior permission?"--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be a pity to spoil this article because of picky and conjectural arguments over tagging. This image could be used with retagging, although some of the others could be dropped if they are going to cause issues. There should be at least one picture of Suprunyuck and Sayenko together in the article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Judge Ivan Senchenko said at the trial "Столь явная ложь вывела из равновесия даже невозмутимого судью Ивана Сенченко. "Вы думаете, вас слепые судят? - не выдержал он. - Так мы на вас уже насмотрелись и анфас, и в профиль... " [1] "This blatant lie disturbed even the imperturbable Judge Ivan Senchenko. 'Do you think that you are blind? This is unsustainable. We have already seen enough of you in full face and in profile...'"--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:BRW7JPG.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BRW7JPG.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- unused logo, no source, if it is for legit company, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder, if not - no need to keep here Skier Dude (talk 05:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Glaoui.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Glaoui.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- watermarked as (c) ph&ph rouget - not dated & given dates of subject impossible to determine the PD/not status without the date Skier Dude (talk 05:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree regarding the watermarks (which probably trumps any other concerns). Given the electr(on)ic apparatus in the photo it is difficult to believe the image is as old as the uploader has claimed. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shannon & Co logo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shannon & Co logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- corporate logo, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Otpc200demo.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Otpc200demo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Bengal.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bengal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- may be cpoyrighted - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 08:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SELF logo.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; now tagged as pd-text. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SELF logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Organizational logo needs confirmation that the uploader can assign license. Eeekster (talk) 11:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I hereby declare that this logo is available under GFDL and it can be used without under its terms. I strongly recommend to visit its source page which clearly mention its availability under open standards. --Anticipator (talk) 11:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that the 'copyleft' section on the site only provides that "You are welcome to copy and redistribute, with or without modifications, either commercially or non-commercially, the texts on this website as the GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) applies." The word 'texts' would seem to exclude images from this release, although I would recommend you go through Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission as this is likely an instance where an organization would release their work. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Map-Palestine-New-Testament-Times.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Source says nothing about the file having been released into the public domain or under the GFDl license. It only says "freely distributed". Theleftorium (talk) 12:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:With tactical.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:With tactical.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- If you look at the first upload, it has some text that looks like it was taken from a catalog of some sort. The text has since been removed. —fetch·comms 17:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Rise Mortgage Credit Distress 2007.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The claim of this (and File:Available Subprime Credit Decline 2007.gif (and maybe some others on Loan modification in the United States, are used under a U.S. government claim, and while they appear in an FTC report, they have caption information that indicates they may have been prepared by a private company. They look too me a lot like charts you would see in the paper or at the WSJ.com. Privately created copyrights aren't transformed into public domain because they're used in a government report, so I think there's a possibility here that these images were used with permission by the government, which means they're not public domain. I'm not sure though, so I brought it here. Shadowjams (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:El mohamady.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:El mohamady.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Field level, professional appearance, no metadata, web resolution - all the usual hallmarks of an image stolen from some press agency or another. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:TwilightAustralia.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TwilightAustralia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The covers of these books are copyrighted. Theleftorium (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shakib Khan1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shakib Khan1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Valobaslei Ghor Bandha Jay Na soundtrack.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CD cover unlikely to be the work of the uploader and even more unlikely to be released under a CC license. Eeekster (talk) 23:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Valobaslei Ghor Bandha Jay Na.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:26, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mim in her bebut fim Amar Ache Jol.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:26, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.