Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Watchlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. There is no consensus in this discussion on whether it should be marked historical.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Watchlist[edit]

Page is totally outdated and unused by the project AFC mabdul 16:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but mark as historical if no longer in use. The page history may contain useful information that would be lost by complete deletion. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it is still actually somewhat useful (for watching changes to the template, for example). Theopolisme (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm not sure how mabdul can unilaterally claim it's not used, unless there's somehow a way to track who goes to the Special:RecentChangesLinked page.. But anyway, I've actually used it a few times, and I have it bookmarked, so it's definitely used :P ~Charmlet ^-talk- 00:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and potentially mark as historical per Newyorkbrad or, better yet, withdraw nomination and get consensus from AFC participants on WT:WPAFC before re-nominating. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but survey AfC participants to determine whether or not to mark historical. the one sean 06:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.