Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was SNOW keep. For general discussion of the future of April Fools' Day on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'. (non-admin closure) — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 14:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mindless Apr 1 joke not belonging here; Wikipedia is serious and this is taking up space on the RfA page. I recommend speedy delete. Rcsprinter (whisper) @ 09:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: This is nowhere near main space, not being read by anyone but Wikipedia editors. We're allowed humor. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:28, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with the rise of Artificial Intelligence it is high time we started putting our cleverest bots through RFA. ϢereSpielChequers 10:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Come on, it's April 1st. It happens once per year. Vacation9 11:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a fantastic article. I know the subject well and I can't believe you would be so mean as to delete him just because he's got no references.Deb (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Category:Wikipedia humor. Ryan Vesey 13:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's all in fun. For all I know, humor is allowed here. ZappaOMati 15:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 17:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per above. Seems logical to me. --Yellow1996 (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per the above. There is no compelling reason to delete this page, so long as it is obvious that it was not an actual RFA. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there is no harm to readers and it is April Fools' day. TBrandley 21:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, nonsense, vandalism, warn the editor who created the page that they will be blocked if they continue. RNealK (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Considering there are some 8 keep !votes already, it clearly would not be an uncontroversial or unambiguous deletion (see CSD). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Oh come on.... This is April Fools' and we deserve some humor right? This is a great page and we need something that could make us happy that is in Wikipedia itself. Also as per Category:Wikipedia humor. Mediran (t • c) 03:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As April Fools pranks go, RfAs aren't likely to spoil the experience for users. It's a bit of fun, and given the amount of stupid drama that occurs, a bit of fun may help us de-escalate and not take Wikipedia too seriously. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:HUMOR TheStrikeΣagle 13:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/GA_bot&oldid=1138700220"