Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davykamanzi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete'. I will recreate it with the Wikipedia-related information for him. Bencherlite ^Talk 09:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davykamanzi[edit]

Violates WP:FAKEARTICLE. Also editor says he is 14, and some of the information might not be approved by his parents. Editor has been counseled but hasn't complied with advice from several editors. It's possible he doesn't understand, don't know, but, either way, the page should be deleted (if he did it himself, he could prune it rather than delete it). Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

support Given the editor has stated a very young age, I am uncomfortable especially with his describing medical and/or " psychiatric diagnoses and anxiety disorders". My own view is that WP:CHILD and WP:CHILDPROTECT come into play here. There's actually a couple better links as well, and I'll try to find those too. — Ched : ? 01:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please clarify if "support" means you support keeping or deleting the page. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I just realized this situation existed. Basically I support the deletion of the "user page". I could be convinced that some small parts (such as the interest in various sports) could be held in a sandbox, or that the page could be saved to the users hard drive. It is the age that concerns me however. I have seen plenty of editors adopt a similar style of explaining who they are and what they do here; yet I feel there may be a lack of good judgment in displaying some of the information that was posted with my concerns resting in privacy related areas. I note that the editor has been making good faith edits to articles, so I feel a certain latitude could be given to their choice of home page style in deference to our WP:BITE policy. I realize there is some contradiction here, but in the end I must regretfully err to the side of what I consider to be safety and maturity isses - delete - but could be persuaded to move to sandbox with noindex tags. — Ched : ? 00:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mostly a WP:FAKEARTICLE. OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
support The user Ched Davis removed some personal information I had put on my userspace. I think that is all that was violating WP:FAKEARTICLE and therefore I think my userspace shouldn't be deleted. Also, I was not aware of WP:CHILD, which says: Users who appear to be children editing in good faith who disclose identifying personal information should be informed of the potential dangers of such disclosure. They should be advised that disclosing personal information is a bad idea and is potentially dangerous. Deletion and oversight may be used in appropriate cases to remove the information. My disclosing of personal information was a mistake that has been rectified and that which I am aware of now. Davykamanzi^talk 06:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please clarify if "support" means you support keeping or deleting the page. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:CHILD is irrelevent; WP:FAKEARTICLE would apply if the user was 9, 14, 40, or 109. Aside from the Babel UBXs, nothing exists to suggest this is a Userpage. Achowat (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there is. I have shown my Wikimedia-related activities on my userpage. Davykamanzi (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The changes simply, aren't good enough to rectify the WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. There's too much information about Davykamanzi the footballer in regards to the information that exists about Davykamanzi the Wikipedian. Since you've shown interest in fixing some issues, feel free to drop me a line and we can talk about how you can reduce the concerns and keep as much (pertinent) information there. Achowat (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is a WP:FAKEARTICLE. And I cannot figure out at all why he's added links saying "Look up davykamanzi in Wiktionary, the free dictionary." and "Meta has related information at:Davykamanzi". Those also make it look like a real article until you follow them and find nothing. Sure, he has userpages there linking back here, but that's not what they imply. Dougweller (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also note! - Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davykamanzi (1st Nomination: Result - Delete) Achowat (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.