Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sufyan Iqbal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sufyan Iqbal[edit]

A completely unsourced autobiography. This has been declined 4 times in 3 days and the author has made no attempt to address the issues raised. There is no sourcing at all to indicate Notability and no indication that it meets Wikipedia:NPOL. Tagging for deletion. KJP1 (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this kind of rapid resubmitting without addressing reviewer comments is a valid reason for deletion Seraphim System ^(talk) 06:35, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Much as I hate to delete so early, especially on an active draft, I have to agree with User:Seraphim System; Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjjjjjdddddd (talk • contribs)
Delete clearly self promotion and no credable claim of significance. Legacypac (talk) 06:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - user has no intention of improving the draft. But they will probably be back as soon as the account is auto confirmed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Repeated resubmission of an autobiography. Not useful. I will comment that the two possible sanctions for tendentious resubmission are deletion and blocks, and deletion is less unfriendly. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotion. The only source being the subject’s personal website makes the page G11 eligible. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Obvious self promotion is obvious. –Davey2010^Talk 23:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced self promotion. KylieTastic (talk) 11:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly doesn’t comply with WP:NPOL. Dan arndt (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.