Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 21

< October 20	October 22 >

October 21

File:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previously nominated for deletion by a bot, but was kept due to two votes. This time, I'm nominating the image here due to my concerns about its compliance with WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. This image is of limited edition EP release and may not be necessary. The other image is already sufficient enough to use. George Ho (talk) 07:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone else is confused about the history, the file was first nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Files for_deletion/2007 June 18#Continuum (album) covers. That was closed as keep, but the closing admin didn't remove {{ffd}}. This caused a bot (thinking the image was tagged but not listed) to relist the image for deletion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 30#Image:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg, which was closed as keep again (this time properly removing the FfD tag). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Mayer - Waiting on the World to Change.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sample was de-PRODded, citing the song's status as John Mayer's signature song. Even as "signature song", I still have concerns about the sample's compliance with WP:NFCC#8/WP:NFC#CS and WP:NFCC#1/WP:FREER. Free text content can already explain what the song is about. I also don't think critical commentary is sufficient enough to support the sample and the sample's content. The assumption that readers couldn't understand what critical commentary describes without the sample underestimates and IMHO would undermine the free text content's ability to teach readers about the song. George Ho (talk) 08:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coldplay - Fix You.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 29. ✗plicit 03:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coldplay - Fix You.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mariya Takeuchi - Plastic Love 2021.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 (t|c) 02:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This cover art is of the upcoming 2021 re-release of "Plastic Love". Sure, the song became more popular due to internet fan-made video back in 2017. Furthermore, a cover art used for the other song "Sweetest Music" was used instead for that video (now deleted?) and is now used for this year's upcoming re-release. There's already the cover art of the original 1985 release, which... well, didn't perform well in Japanese music chart. Still, why need the re-release cover? George Ho (talk) 09:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I started other discussion at Talk:Plastic Love on whether to use the "Sweetest Music" cover, identical to the reissue cover. George Ho (talk) 09:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Just trying to clarify: you want to remove the reissue cover and replace it with the "Sweetest Music" cover under fair use? ◢ Ganbaruby!  (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ganbaruby: If that's possible and there are no objections... then yeah. Not as part of top infobox; rather part of "Resurgence" section. Well... Even if the Sweetest Music cover won't be accepted, I still don't think the reissue cover is necessary. --George Ho (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Reissue covers are displayed on articles all the time, and for good reason. This one has more relevance than most, as the reissue cover both shows the Sweetest Music photo that's become associated with the song and serves as evidence of the cultural impact of the song's resurgence in the specific form that it did. ElspethOfValeron (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you favor using the reissue cover instead of the "Sweetest Music" cover art, right? George Ho (talk) 23:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. The key thing, in my eyes, is that the reissue cover demonstrates that the cultural impact of the "Plastic Lover" video was enough to inspire official recognition of the correlation between the song and the image. ElspethOfValeron (talk) 01:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per ElspethOfValeron. The Sweetest Music cover should go on the article about Sweetest Music, not here. There should be more reasoning than "don't think it's necessary". ◢ Ganbaruby!  (talk) 07:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per ElspethOfValeron. The use of the reissued cover for "Plastic Love" does not netigate the existence of the "Sweetest Music" single. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 03:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ramones-Blitzkrieg Bop.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sample is more than 10% of the song's length and may violate WP:NFCC#3b and MOS:SAMPLE. Even when the length issue is fixable, the sample may still need to comply with WP:NFCC#8/WP:NFC#CS and WP:NFCC#1/WP:FREER. It has been used in four articles: Blitzkrieg Bop, Punk rock, Ramones, and Ramones (album). I don't think the usages in the band article and the song article comply with NFCC. The sample should be removed from those two articles. Unsure whether any sample (same or different) of the song meets NFCC well in the other two articles: one genre and one song. George Ho (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dean1ofFAS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a photograph of a photograph. No evidence uploader owns the copyright to the original. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSW Store San Antonio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader says image was taken with an iPhone 7, but the low resolution and "Instagram" in the metadata say otherwise. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jay1095: Please upload the original file if you really took this picture. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photo of Pritam Ghosh.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality and unused photo of non-notable person. Article about subject was deleted. Furthermore, the description says the photo is to be used for Wikipedia only, which contradicts the CC0 license. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RichardWilsonBaner.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stabiliti Poster English.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused film poster, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free as article for the film is still in draft. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brian Tyler 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as an official photo at IMDb. [1] VRT permission is required. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Midwakh2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I agree with Salavat and have no particular fondness for this crop. -- Frotz(talk) 20:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Persepolis Seasons(2008).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manndorff-Coat-of-Arms.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced to old books but it doesn't say which books, so the public domain claim can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avarice Lincoln Cathedral West.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Turner CIMG7263.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RF02915 rscape secondary structure.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sullivan Mountain Lions ticket stub.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus public domain reason. The logo on the ticket meets the threshold of originality. Stefan2 (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Suplee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Description suggests photo is a screen grab from a TV show. Low resolution also suggests this is not "own work" as claimed. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 06:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bird identifcation chart, Sultanpur national park.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in India. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 06:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soviet Major General Fyodor Samuilovich Kolchuk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Copyright law of the Soviet Union#Transition to post-Soviet legislation in Russia: That new Russian law had a general copyright term of 50 years p.m.a.[145] and was retroactive,[146] restoring copyright on works on which the shorter Soviet copyright terms had already expired. The old five-year term is irrelevant. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Kilwa Sultanate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Perspective-2point.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mary Pickford historical plaque.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP. Also unclear if the Creative Commons licence only applies to Wikipedia due to the ambiguous wording. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Helmut Missner.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free -FASTILY 22:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the photographer died before 1926 as required per {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I updated the file rationale. {Non-free fair use in|Helmut Missner|image has rationale=yes} Lightburst (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you confused "rationale" with licensing change that you made recently. I added the rationale on your behalf. --George Ho (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:George Ho Thank you for that! - I was just trying to work on it and I very much appreciate your help! Lightburst (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hirosaki Temps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rogerssp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality, unidentified building. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caslte Irwell Student village sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

School logo is likely above the threshold of originality even in the United States. No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United Kingdom. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flora ceylon20190424.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder or that the cover is old enough to be in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 06:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.