Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 November 21

November 21

File:Ubiquitous Energy logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Ubiquitous Energy logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Faceless Enemy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

replaced with File:Ubiquitous_Energy_logo_2.png Martin Urbanec (talk) 01:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaliyah, sitting atop a limousine, on a photoshoot in 2001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Aaliyah, sitting atop a limousine, on a photoshoot in 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HunterDawn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is not the subject of any significant sourced commentary and so fails WP:NFCC#8. The non-free usage rationale is vague as to purpose only stating "Aaliyah working as a model". That she worked as a model can be stated with text so this fails WP:NFCC#1. This image is from a professional photoshoot. There is no explanation as to why this would not impinge on commercial opportunties. Fails WP:NFCC#2. Whpq (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oktogon Budapest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Oktogon Budapest.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryanbpest95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Bad source link. Can find archived versions of the image, but can't find a page where it appeared. Archived and current versions of the parent site have standard copyright notices, make no mention of the CC license used here.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - No evidence of a free license. The source site is pretty clearly marked with a copyright notice on the archive which was made on the same day as the image was uploaded. -- Whpq (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grand Hotel Royal evening.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Grand Hotel Royal evening.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryanbpest95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Questionable license. The deeplink to the image was archived, so I believe it is a good source. However, there is no license on the deeplink. The one archive of the parent site (https://web.archive.org/web/20070320231220/http://www.aleph.hu/~pegazussport/) does not explicitly mention reserving copyright, but it also does not explicitly mention the Creative Commons license that the uploader used. Based on other uploads by the user that I've looked at, including one listed above, I doubt that the license is good.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - No evidence for the stated license. I suspect this image is a publicity photo for the hotel, or perhaps a stock photo. See this article (from Feb 2009) which uses a higher resolution version the the same image. -- Whpq (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
• Comment I replaced it in the article. Also, it has a lower-quality duplicate on Commons named c:File:Corinthia Hotel Budapest. - Hcom 1097758 7 b.jpg (once uploadeded to enwiki by Mmoneyraker724); if the image is deleted here, it should be deleted there as well. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 19:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Future-Ralph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Future-Ralph.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kiyosuki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC #8. The only references to adult Ralph in the text are "seemingly playing straight man to Bart as an adult in one possible flashforward" and "Adult Ralph in "Bart to the Future" also has light brown hair." Given the limited discussion and the hair color difference easily being describable in words, this doesn't seem to have contextual significance. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - The removal of the image would not detract from a reader's understanding of the topic of Ralph Wiggum. Fails WP:NFCC#8. - Whpq (talk) 04:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RogerMeyers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:RogerMeyers.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC #8. Meyers' appearance is not discussed, and is not really significant to the subject. There are already multiple non-free images in the article, and this one does not particularly contribute to the reader's understanding of the subject. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - The image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary and its removal would not detract from a reader's understanding of the article topic which is Itchy and Scratchy. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:14th Pakistan National Assembly.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:14th Pakistan National Assembly.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mollajutt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to be obselete and is orphaned. SVG file contains errors. No reason for usage. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 05:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:115senate.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:115senate.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Foghe (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Obselete and orphaned, SVG contains errors. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.