Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 17

< September 16	September 18 >

September 17

File:3-Benzoyloxycyclohexen-Synthese.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image (frame size is too big in relation to actual content) Keministi (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stinson Hall, Woodlawn School.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Un-splittable file, No confirmation of a 'free' license for either version. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Defensive bearded dragon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Un-splittable file, Unused. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since the uploads were by the same person three minutes apart, and the first image is a mammal of some sort and most certainly not a bearded dragon, I think we can take it on faith that the first upload is accidental and that we don't need to worry about splitting it. The second image is not terrible quality and it's of an encyclopedic subject so it should be moved to Commons. --B (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mishkinqalam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Un-splitable file. Unclear which revision the attached information is supposed to be associated with. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Japan election 2005 prior.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: not deleted and there is no real need to split the image anyway unless it is useful in some way - it is common practice on Wikipedia to have updated versions of a chart or a table uploaded over top of each other. --B (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsplitable file, No license or incomplete information for overwritten/reverted revisions. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: perhaps I don't understand the issue but it was created by me and is licensed under GFDL. If more info is needed, I can provide but I need to know what is missing. -- Taku (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that a different image has become intertwined in the history. Namely - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/0/06/20050913233749%21Japan_election_2005_prior.png. Your version IS correctly attributed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They were also created by me and so there should be no copyright issue. If asked, I can also reupload the current image. -- Taku (talk) 22:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn pending upload of images under new titles. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GPS-broadcast-signal.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently un-splittable file, Most recent revision on Commons as File:GPS signal modulation scheme.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fyodor Petrovich Tolstoy 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently un-splittable file, No license information for most recent revision ( most likely pd-art). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DubCrtHouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently unsplittable file, both versions for meta-date in summary, and the image is in use. If it can be split to two files both should be on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dover Hotel, Petty Street, Dover, Stewart County, TN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently unsplittable file, In-use, Given meta-data relates to previous upload. Most recent revision is not PD-US as it was taken in 2006 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DJ Z-Trip (2006).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently un-splittable file, Which (or both) of the revisions was under the given license? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bond hill, cincinnati.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently unsplittable, information block relates to most recent revision, apparently this was uploaded because of a lack of clarity about the original upload under this name. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RRF TRF.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently unsplittable, Which version is current? File notes it has been superseded anyway, but is is still in use in one article. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RussiaNorthOssetia.Highlight.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which revision does the added information block actually refer to? Lack of clarity regarding this. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ryan Miller (musician).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryan Miller (musician) (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Apparently un-splitable file, unused. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I'm confused why it can't be split. I just did it - split into File:Ryan Miller (musician).jpg and File:Ryan Miller (musician) (2).jpg. (I did it more because I wanted to see for myself what the problem with splitting is, not because there is actually a use for the images.) Since neither image is used, I think it's fine to delete both. --B (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@B: The problem is that there is no upload in the file history, it only shows up on the file page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Until 2009(ish?), the upload never showed up in the file history - only in the logs. If there were an image where we really wanted both versions and we had a reasonable expectation that the license applies to both versions, does that really matter? We upload images to Commons all the time where the author of the image isn't going to show up in the history. As long as we edit the description page to say who that uploader is, I don't see why that shouldn't suffice. (It's probably mostly an academic point - with 99.99% of images where there is an unrelated image in the file history, one of them is a copyright violation anyway so we rarely are going to want both images.) --B (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Giovanni Lipioni seen from Il Monte mountain(2006).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently un-splittable, unused barring one redirect. Meta-data for revisions seems to be in the edit summaries. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sign of Albertaco's in the Cypress location.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aparrently un-splittable, Only used in user space, intervening image is 2D artwork (and thus not necessarily subject to FoP exemptions.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both No FOP for signs. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture 172.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently un-splittable, Information for original upload is apparently only on the file description page for that upload. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabolandpm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image of living persons. need permission via OTRS. the uploader has submitted many copyvios. Saqib (talk) 10:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pirma.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of unidentified subject with unclear permission. Stefan2 (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goniatite drawing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically un-sourced, but pre 2006 upload and in use, Hence FFD referal ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stevan Harnad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Withdrawn by nom in favour of alternative forums of discussion. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Various portrait images, claimed GFDL, but technically unsourced or lacking in ways to confirm that license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - The most recent uploader, who I'd reached out to left an Own work tag for the more recent revisions, so the FFD can be withdrawn. The issue of the previous revisions can be handled in a different discussion.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pir Saqib Shaami.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of a person who does not have a corresponding article. For the last three years, there have been various and sundry attempts to turn the image description page into an article. The person depicted seems very possibly notable and the photo would even be potentially useful in an article about this person. The problem is, however, that it appears to be Flickrwashing. The source given is a Flickr account with two images, one of which is clearly a screenshot from a video of some sort. It was uploaded to Flickr two days before it was uploaded here. It is highly unlikely that the license is valid. B (talk) 13:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TREX 600 NSP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. Please follow WP:DCP to get the file restored -FASTILY 00:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image description page says "Photographer: Paul Chapman" but gives no indication whether Paul Chapman is the uploader or someone else. This is a very nice photo and it would be nice if we could keep it. (Unfortunately, the uploader does not have email enabled.) B (talk) 13:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader - leeph and the helicopter pictured as the subject of the image is my property. The photographer Paul Chapman is an aeromodeller friend of mine. I don't fully understand your message about the photo 'it would be nice if we could keep it' without letting me know why it is that you might *not* be able to keep it?

I'm afraid I am a novice Wikipedia user and therefore I am not au fait with your processes and policies, and I am assuming that this has been flagged for lacking the appropriate copyright statement/permission for use. Please advise what you need me to do. I can obtain written permission from the photographer if needed.

leeph (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2018 (BST)

@Leeph: Please read WP:COPYREQ which will explain how to confirm the permission.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RichardKillblane1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purportedly a photo of Richard E. Killblane with no real source (I'm not sure if it is him or not). It was obviously taken by a US service member, but we would need to know that it was taken in his official duties, not just while he was taking photos for fun. There is an unquestionably PD photo of him at https://www.army.mil/article/178622/rpoe_deployments_to_be_documented that we can use, so unless we can get clarification, I don't know that we need this one. B (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StonerFunniesCover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I improperly uploaded this as PD, this issue is one of several that are not PD in the series due to reprints of newspaper comics still in copyright. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 16:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bridge Street under water 6 September 2008.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Presumed own work, and in use hence FFD referral. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The same user uploaded File:Oliver's Mill 7 March 1963.jpg one minute later and tagged it with the same {{GFDL}} tag (and no further comment), when it's very dubious that they created this later image. Then ten minutes later, they uploaded File:High Ford Weir 14 September 2008.jpg, which has a very clear statement of authorship and contains EXIF data. So I think it's pretty clear that this image is a copyvio. Deleted. --B (talk) 23:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SWIMflag2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, purpose or link to notable subject unclear. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elon Musk's submarine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 30. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elon Musk's submarine.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brian0918 colors.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikipedia screenshot ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oswald dome fire tower sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete As said below, this is a derivative work of the copyrighted sign. The text of an historical marker can be used as a citation without a photo of it being stored on wiki. Obviously, if it is something controversial, evidence would be nice, but this isn't really something that will stir up controversy. And I suppose if someone challenges this, an administrator can look at the deleted revision. --B (talk) 23:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of third party artwork with separate copyright ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I took the photo with my phone. I am currently using it as a citation. Bneu2013 (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per violation of own work: "Own work: You own all rights to the image, usually meaning that you created it entirely yourself. In case of a photograph or screenshot, you must also own the copyright for all copyright-protected items (e.g. statue or app) that appear in it". Uploader admits that they do not own the copyright of the photographed subject. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 23:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.