Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 3

< July 2	July 4 >

July 3[edit]

File:Sydney Grammar School Playground.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as PD-self (assuming good faith), but a previous publication noted, which cannot be verified currently. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SS1EMAIN.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as PD-self, but the content of this media, is apparently the screenshot output of software by a third party. If the uploader was connected to the developers the file description page should so say. No objections to this file being converted to Non-free use, under NFCC. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SS2EMAIN.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as PD-self, but the content of this media, is apparently the screenshot output of software by a third party. If the uploader was connected to the developers the file description page should so say. No objections to this file being converted to Non-free use, under NFCC. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Downtown Link Map.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as PD-self (author claims the photo), However what is shown appears to be a 2D poster. As Canada (the likely origin, given the Halifax mention in the subject matter.), does not have FoP for 2D works (see c:COM:FOP#Canada), a review of this media at FFD is advisable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Big Badass Starship (Neocapitalist's personal icon).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PD-self license tag used, is potentialy incompatible with the sole usage reservation given in the file description information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:13 Spear - Der Ring Des Nibelungen.mp3[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refferal to FFD, as technically unsourced. Whilst the composition may be PD, a specific arrangment/performance is not necessarily. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Self101.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old user profile image, attributed to "Courtney Gallaher" but the name associated with the uploader on their page is "Shaun Langley". Who actually took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jazz a juan.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at Commons, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ajpolino, Photo of a logo on the side of building in France, which does not have FoP. This is mostly text though so may be ineligible? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UCC Sign.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of 2D art, namely the sign artwork which has a seperate copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pepperjackstalin2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, orphan, inexplicably marked as unsuitable for commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Woodville Karst geo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at Commons: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woodville Karst geo.png , No attribution information for base map given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gariahat mall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attributed to seaview99, but claimed as PD-self by uploader. Who actually took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the uploader is not the copyright holder. The file summary information provides as permission "according to the permission of author as given in the talk page of the article kolkata", which after some rummaging around in the archives of that talk page reveal this statement. There is no explicit statement of licensing to be applied. The post did provide a flickr galley and I did fin the specific image. However, the licensing on flickr is all rights reserved and not a suitable creative commons license. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glowingpickle1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lower quality image, only used on a talk page, and otherwise orphaned. Could be moved to commons if there was a good description? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Send to commons. I gave it a description and fixed the rest of the data fields to ease toe move. I agree it is a lower-quality image. However, in this one, at least the pickle itself looks more definitely green and we have no other images except this one and File:Glowing-pickle-elfi-von-fliegenpilz.png for Glowing pickle demonstration. DMacks (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The White Box Crew and the White Box.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image that does not assert the notability or significance of it's subject matter. Therefore referral to FFD on scope grounds. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horst JENS 2005 08 portrait small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as self, but attributed to "taken 2005/08 in Vienna from CoWorker Michael LADINIG." Who took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PWRR TRF.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, obsoleted by SVG version.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darshan Academy Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a logo for a school, it's claimed as PD-self, but it's not clear how the user has rights in the non-trival design (possibly by a third party.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your advices and edits; all necessary corrections have been made--sheenamalhotra182 (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Science of Spirituality Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded as PD-self , but this is a non-trival logo, and it's not clear how the uploader has rights in the logo design shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your advices and edits; all necessary corrections have been made--sheenamalhotra182 (talk) 18:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pasig Pirates logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Davao Occidental Tigers logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stephan P. du Toit Viljoen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is uploaded with a self tag, but attributed to "Free Market Foundation", permisson claim would need OTRS confirmation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marikina Shoemasters logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mandaluyong El Tigre logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tour Majunga.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Architectural work, by a French Architect that is still living, France does not have Freedom of Panaroma, and the architectural work shown is clearly intended to be the subject of this image. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swiss Miss Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vlna-II Wave-II,50x50x23cm,70kg,2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vlna-I Wave-I,50x50x22cm,70kg,2018-1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of proof and likely to fall be non-free art. Salavat (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Casoprostor-II Time-space-II,50x50x17cm,50kg,2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of proof and likely to fall be non-free art. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vitezna-brana Triumphal-arch,50x50x12cm,60kg,2018-1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of proof and likely to fall be non-free art.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bella-donna,80x50x17cm,90kg,2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of proof and likely to fall be non-free art.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dotek-svetla Touch-of-light,35x35x10cm,15kg,2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of proof and likely to fall be non-free art.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ivana-Masitova-Czech-Glass-Artist-Portrait.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but neither the listed artist or photographer, match up in an obvious way with the user name uploading this. Clarification or OTRS needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siol nan Gaidheal constitution.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 July 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siol nan Gaidheal constitution.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sanitationstrikemarker.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 July 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanitationstrikemarker.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheBackstagerMoviePoster1 2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded as a self claim but clearly a promotional poster, attributed to "Red Phoenix Pictures". There's no obivous link between them and the uploader noted on the file description page. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Would be fair-use in Draft:The Backstager if that draft were to have been accepted, but it was declined. DMacks (talk) 03:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QMobile New Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logos are typically held by a third party, there's no obvious reason why this should be a self claim, over an ineligible one. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free logo. I have relicensed it to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 23:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:467012-ashes-cricket-playstation-4-front-cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is uploaded under a self claim but would clearly seem to be cover-art for a video game? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a non-free video game cover. I have relicensed it to non-free video game cover and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mohsin-at-bright-Miss-India-Perfect.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Alex Shih (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst I am willing to Assume Good Faith on this, a query on the English Wikipedia IRC channel suggested I bring this to FFD over a concern that it might be a capture from a third-party source, and not necessarily self. Please feel free to tell me I'm being overly cautious. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mohsin-at-bright-Miss-India-Perfect.png&diff=prev&oldid=848798583 - Hmm... Making the screenshot does not necessarily make it own work right? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image is clearly a screenshot, and is confirmed on the file's talk page. Taking a screenshot does not transfer the copyright from the original video to the person taking the screenshot. -- Whpq (talk) 18:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited the page once have a view——-User:Ashwini Gadade —Preceding undated comment added 03:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CottonMillFounder.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 July 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CottonMillFounder.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.