Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 12

< September 11	September 13 >

September 12[edit]

File:JJAstor3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 01:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Move to Commons: There does not seem to be any reason for this to be kept locally on Wikipedia, so it should either be moved to Commons or deleted. If moved, it can be added to c:Category:John Jacob Astor III. Files on Commons can be used by other WMF projects so maybe someone will find a use for it. If for some reason it can't be removed to Commons, it should be deleted. Wikipedia is not intended to be an image repository for unused files. Moreover, files shold only be kept locally when there's a sufficient policy/guideline based reason for doing so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If transferred, it's possible it may be deleted on Commons for the same reason; Commons has (similar) superior images: File:Appletons' Astor John Jacob (capitalist).jpg, File:John Jacob Astor III.jpg. -FASTILY 04:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving was just a suggestion. If there's no point to making such a move, then it should be deleted because a local version is not needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amra Kajan.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, blurry, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 01:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Dagga Couple.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 11:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work, appears to be a video screenshot. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own image from my Galaxy S5 (if you look carefully) cropped from the original, not a screenshot of a video. Happy to send the original and all the others I took that day in Barrydale. Happy to get the 2 people in the photo to verify this if it helps. Rob van vee 05:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was in a hurry and forgot to check the EXIF data. Withdrawn. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adesewa 2017 phooto.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Professional image without metadata. Dubious claim of own work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: File might have been uploaded for use in Adesewa Josh and became orphaned when the article was deleted. Maybe tagging this with {{npd}} would've been better than FFD, but I don't think this should be kept unless the uploader wants to try WP:CONSENT and email WP:OTRS. Just for reference, the same editor has also uploaded other images which have the same problem, and I've tagged these for speedy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Creed and Hal Sparks.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 04:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simonateba.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Image with no educational value. Personal image ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 08:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gojoseon dynasty.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unambiguous COPYVIO. The uploader called it his "own work", but in the same edit admitted that he had scanned it from a Korean "government textbook". It's already been deleted from Commons (where the closer said that "government-published textbook" is also wrong, for what that's worth), but it's still a COPYVIO here as well unless a fair use rationale is provided; "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses" is not a fair use rationale. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File has apparently been deleted from ko.wiki (no idea how to post the evidence), with the uploader expressing his poor understanding of copyright in response (if Google Translate is to be believed). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brutal.io.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a screenshot, from a video game whose article is proposed for deletion. Presumably the listed uploader in the summary took the screenshot, but forgot to add the other essential details? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails Wikipedia guidelines for screenshots and is soon to be orphaned anyway._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Timbre Performing at Audiotree Live in 2013 - Licensed by and Courtesy of Audiotree Live.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listed video source is not licensed under Creative Commons, but under a standard You Tube (proprietary) license. OTRS required from copyright holder of original footage. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm relatively new to editing Wiki and I have an explicit email permission to use this image from Audiotree Live (the copyright holder of the original footage) via their Director of Photography, Shen Kahn. How would I go about providing the OTRS? Thank you so much for your help.Eoiae (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to c:COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder for some general information; the page is for Wikimedia Commons, but the information also applies to Wikipedia files as well. The original copyright holder needs to be aware of WP:CONSENT because permission needs to be basically given to allow anyone anywhere to download the file at any time for any purpose, including commercial, and that such a permission cannot be revoked/canceled after the fact. If you do decide to send in an email, please read WP:Contact OTRS for the address you need to use. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1976 YugoslavianNationalSwimmingChampionship YouthJuniors Mostar.pdf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not simple text, it appears to be an entire document. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ellen Gustafson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the subject's own thumbnail on social media e.g. https://medium.com/@ellengustafson/. Unlikely to be property of the uploader as claimed. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muzon NHS location (cropped).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a map of unknown origin. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muzon NHS location.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a map of unknown origin. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.