Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 March 10

< March 9	March 11 >

March 10

File:2001 Space Odyssey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Pan American World Airways. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stedium west.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image covered in watermarks. LGA _talk^edits 06:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I2MTC poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Work for hire, need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2012 ESF-JSPS poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Work for hire, need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conversational calculator.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Work for hire, need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simultaneous localization and mapping.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probable work for hire (given other uploads), need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thegrassyknollclonehigh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR per WP:NFCC#8. There is already one piece of non-free media identifying the characters and the series. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fatigue tracking system.tiff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probable work for hire (given other uploads), need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clonehighcastmusical.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR per WP:NFCC#8. There is already one piece of non-free media identifying the characters and the series. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clone High Season 1 DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR per WP:NFCC#8. There is already one piece of non-free media identifying the characters and the series. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Locomotion interface.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probable work for hire (given other uploads), need the permission of the Uni. LGA _talk^edits 07:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Human-caring robot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probable work for hire (given other uploads), need the permission of the Uni. Also issues with software screen grabs. LGA _talk^edits 07:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ausonia09-da.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image of the same ship shown in the non-free image File:Louis line postcard of SS Ausonia.JPG used in the same article. I cannot see what significant additional knowledge two, as opposed to one, image of the same ship gives to readers. Fails NFCC#3a as excessive use of non-free content. Peripitus (Talk) 09:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JanJanJan123.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Its just a picture, jeez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abhishek Suman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Vanity photo of non-editor. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rovilsonfernandez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, with unclear status Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vilazodone2D.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, accuracy disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The amide bond in it is drawn perfectly fine as the double bond electrons are delocalised. Fuse809 (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tautomerism is not the same as simple delocalization. An amide is an amide, by definition with no H on O, rather than an imidic acid. And even if it were "just a delocalized form", it's also missing an H on the...O I guess. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piracetam2D.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, accuracy disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The amide bond in it is drawn perfectly fine as the double bond electrons are delocalised. Fuse809 (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tautomerism is not the same as simple delocalization. An amide is an amide, by definition with no H on O, rather than an imidic acid. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piracetam3Dan.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, accuracy disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The amide bond in it is drawn perfectly fine as the double bond electrons are delocalised. Fuse809 (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tautomerism is not the same as simple delocalization. An amide is an amide, by definition with no H on O, rather than an imidic acid. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vilazodone2D1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, accuracy disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The amide bond in it is drawn perfectly fine as the double bond electrons are delocalised. Fuse809 (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tautomerism is not the same as simple delocalization. An amide is an amide, by definition with no H on O, rather than an imidic acid. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vilazodone2DACS3.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, accuracy disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The amide bond in it is drawn perfectly fine as the double bond electrons are delocalised. Fuse809 (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tautomerism is not the same as simple delocalization. An amide is an amide, by definition with no H on O, rather than an imidic acid. DMacks (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1908 OS Map of St. Helens GCR Station Area.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept and tagged for the move to commons - Peripitus (Talk) 05:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map extract. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was used, at St Helens Central (GCR) railway station, until the uploader got annoyed and removed all the images prior to removing all their text as well, essentially reverting the article back to this version. Discussions on user talk page here and here failed to resolve the matter. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons as potentially useful. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons per RedRose64. Thryduulf (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remains of Standish Street Bridge carrying St. Helens GCR Railway.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept and tagged for commons - Peripitus (Talk) 11:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, uploader removed both a Commons tag and a Keep Local. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was used, at St Helens Central (GCR) railway station, until the uploader got annoyed; see #File:1908 OS Map of St. Helens GCR Station Area.jpg above. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons as potentially useful. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons per RedRose64. Thryduulf (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remains of Viaduct which carried GCR over LNWR at St. Helens.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept and tagged to move to commons - Peripitus (Talk) 05:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, uploader removed both a Commons tag and a Keep Local Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was used, at St Helens Central (GCR) railway station, until the uploader got annoyed; see #File:1908 OS Map of St. Helens GCR Station Area.jpg above. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons as potentially useful. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons per RedRose64. Thryduulf (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:International-cap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - the image is non-free and there is no rationale for use here. Only use in in the generic article Cap (sport) where it could be replaced with free content, and indeed at present is - Peripitus (Talk) 06:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is likely non-free, not de minimis — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How ridiculous. Why delete the image - why not relist it as non-free logo, as right? What is it with this deletionist attitude? Jack1956 (talk) 12:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because free caps may be available (1886 introduction, after all, according to the article). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then you find one. Jack1956 (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:NFCC does not require that a free image exist, just that one can be reasonably created. The "then you find one" is unconstructive. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and put non-free logo on image. Jack1956 (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TIME Magazine cover June 12 1958.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Copyright violation. This Time cover is from June 2, 1958. It's copyright (B00000714794) was renewed in 1986 and it's copyright renewal number is RE0000303808. It will be in the public domain on January 1, 2054. —RP88 ^(talk) 14:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FIFA releases official poster of World Cup 2014 in Brazil, Jan 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chris Hadfield unveiling $5 banknote of the Frontier Series from ISS during Expedition 35, 30 April 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image original source is NASA, therefore PD-USGov-NASA. TLSuda (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doesnt meet WP:NFCC#8 Werieth (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image was derived from one distributed by the media from a screen capture of a live event hosted by the Canadian Space Agency and Bank of Canada via NASA. I believe it is from a NASA TV livestream, which may or may not put it in the public domain. (I would find the source, but video isn't working properly on my computer and crashes my system instantly. I've searched the NASA TV website for an archive of this event, but could not find it. Here's a YouTube video from the Canadian Space Agency - I don't know the licence, as loading the video page crashed my browser. Sigh.) Replacing this image with a PD version, or relicensing this image as appropriate would be welcome. Mind matrix 19:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is sourced from a NASA video. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr0g_xD20mA Because this material was created by NASA, it is probably in the public domain and not protected by copyright. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-USGov-NASA This should be uploaded to Commons. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets NFCC#8 (whether it also meets PD-USGov as well, being NASA sourced) for Frontier Series as this was the public unveiling of the note (and coincidentally, done from space). Andy Dingley (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about the contents of the image is being discussed? It appears to be just Chris Hadfield floating in space. Not something we need a non-free image to illustrate. If you want use a free picture of Chris Hadfield to show who unveiled it, but we dont need a non-free image of a person floating in space in an article about bank notes. Werieth (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To you, it's just some guy floating in space. To the Canadian Mint, it was an iconic presentation with someone who was the most prominent Canadian of the time, thus chosen specifically to launch the new notes. This choice was deliberate. It is appropriately echoed in the choice of image here. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ariana barouk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, of an unidentifed person. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unoabjd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be replaceable by pictures of older dolls such as File:Balljointed bisque head doll.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - tl;dr nutshell: File:Balljointed bisque head doll.jpg depicts an entirely different type of doll than what the article is about. Full explanation: Following reliable sources, the bulk of the prose of Ball-jointed doll deals with modern Asian ball-jointed dolls, which are the type of doll that are defined as ball-jointed dolls. File:Balljointed bisque head doll.jpg depicts a doll that would be defined as an antique, German bisque doll, a style and type of doll that predates modern Asian ball-jointed dolls by about a century. It is included in the Ball-jointed doll article history section as an historical influence, but it cannot adequately replace an image of an modern Asian ball-jointed doll, which have a distinct aesthetic style, influenced by Asian popular culture, as discussed in the article, cited to reliable sources. File:Unoabjd.jpg is used as an example of this style of doll, as per WP:NFCI #7 and this particular brand is mentioned in the article and reliable sources as an early, typical example. And the style and type of modern Asian ball-jointed dolls discussed in reliable sources are all brand-name, copyright protected dolls sold commercially, which means a free alternative depicting the dolls the article deals with would not be possible to find. -- Siawase (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosebud-Newsweek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garfield and Friends Vol. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFG and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Keep the photo that's on the Garfield and Friends page, except for the photo I originally uploaded. Since I can't delete my own photos that I don't want on Wikipedia anymore, somebody else has to do it. I don't hardly upload any photos on this site anymore because they don't always stay on Wikipedia, so I quit doing uploads on this site. That is all I got to say.Stco23 (talk) 00:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jele-nova-flasa.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no permission from photographer - though use of a non-free label may be unavoidable, there should be permission from the photographer rather than using a copyrighted photo of the non-free bottle Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.