Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 November 1

< October 31	November 2 >

November 1

File:Newspaper where Lemmens is mentioned when he received his exam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The description of the file states that it a copy of a digital newspaper from 1929. Unfortunately, the article self is talking about exams taken in March and April 1932. Proper sourcing (which newspaper?) is missing and intended target article is removed. The Banner talk 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The AFD on the article it was intended for closed as a WP:SNOW delete, no other forseeable use so there's no point spending time trying to sort out the source etc. January (talk) 18:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HanKissesLeia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since the relationship of Han Solo and Princess Leia is not independently notable at the out-of-universe perspective, this image is distracting and interferes with the prose. Also, very few or no sources significantly cover the kiss between these two characters, and there isn't a reliable source significantly covering the whole relationship itself. George Ho (talk) 03:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I found a few brief mentions of the subject, although they don't all directly discuss this specific image.^[1]^[2]

^[3] ^[4] ^[5] ^[6] ^[7] ^[8] ^[9] -- Trevj (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ 10 Great Films Ruined By Terrible Plot Twists, wegotthiscovered.com
^ Geoff King; Tanya Krzywinska (2000). Science Fiction Cinema: From Outerspace to Cyberspace. Wallflower Press. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-903364-03-1.
^ Stephen W. Simpson (1 June 2008). What Women Wish You Knew about Dating: A Single Guy's Guide to Romantic Relationships. Baker Books. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-8010-6840-9.
^ Matthew Kapell; John Shelton Lawrence (1 January 2006). Finding the Force of the Star Wars Franchise: Fans, Merchandise, & Critics. Peter Lang. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-8204-6333-9.
^ Matthew Bortolin (18 June 2012). The Dharma of Star Wars. Wisdom Publications Inc. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-86171-828-3.
^ M. Keith Booker (1 January 2006). Alternate Americas: Science Fiction Film and American Culture. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-275-98395-6.
^ James Walters (1 June 2011). Fantasy Film: A Critical Introduction. Berg. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-84788-842-6.
^ Douglas Brode; Leah Deyneka (2 July 2012). Sex, Politics, and Religion in Star Wars: An Anthology. Scarecrow Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-0-8108-8515-8.
^ Dave Wolverton (1995). The Courtship of Princess Leia. Random House LLC. ISBN 978-0-553-56937-7.

Delete, fails WP:NFCC#8 and 3a. The article has another non-free image illustrating the character and the scene depicted here is easily understood without an additional image. January (talk) 16:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Breaking Bad's final episode Felina.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically but used ornamentally. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not place the image on Felina (Breaking Bad) to decorate the page, it was placed there for commentary regarding both the nature and the visual symbolism of the episode which the page's written section does not supply. I find that it is under fair use, referring to Wikipedia:NFCI#Images which clearly states:

Video screenshots: For critical commentary and discussion of the work in question. (i.e., films, television programs, and music videos) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alternative595 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no critical commentary or discussion. All I see here is a picture of a man. Could easily be described with just text. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FarmGirlGabby.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically and one piece of non-free media is already included to identify the character. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chakram 05.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically and one piece of non-free media is already included to identify the character. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Illustrates one of the character's weapons, which is mentioned or discussed in the article, and aids in understanding the character's overall physical change throughout the series. Flyer22 (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is already another image of the character, so this extra image fails WP:NFCC#3a. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bottromycin Total Synthesis, Part 1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considered redundant and poor quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laser hohlraum target energy coupling.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Acather96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, Vector version is already at Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. File:Laser hohlraum target energy coupling.svg supercedes. Begoon ^talk 12:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Proposed Bottromycin Biosynthetic Pathway.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Proposed bottromycin biosynthetic pathway.png., also considered poor quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bottromycin A2 Structure.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Chemical structure of bottromycin A2.png. and considered poor quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete unreadable, and not a candidate for commons, and redudant to File:Chemical structure of bottromycin A2.png Christian75 (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avec-toi-by-axel-tony-feat-tunisiano.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#3a. This alternate cover is the same as the original but with the words "Feat. Tunisiano" added to it. Aspects (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fuck-shit-up-by-karl-wolf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#3a. This alternate cover is the same as the original but with the "Fuck" instead of "Mash" and a Parental Advisory sticker on it. Aspects (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgantas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Acather96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very low-resolution image. No longer used, and superseded by commons:File:Nikolaos Georgantas, 1904 Olympics.jpg. Delirium (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Liebsleben-soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the soundtrack cover is different from the film poster, the soundtrack is not notable and the section could not have its own article. Aspects (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cher Closer to the Truth Target Deluxe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File fails per WP:NFCC#3a. Cover is already demonstrated on page. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 17:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#3a. This alternate image is from the same photo shoot with Cher having the same hairdo, the same wardrobe, the same pillow and the same bed, therefore there is no new information to be gathered from this image. Aspects (talk) 17:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daily Recod cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10b. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:View of the Granton Garden, April 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with {{OTRS pending}} since June, but is also listed as unfree. If unfree, then it violates WP:NFCC#1. See also WP:OTRS/N#File:View of the Granton Garden, April 2012.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JoeyPrusak.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am querying if this image is of a notable person, given that it does not appear to be in use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The uploader clearly intended the photo to be used at Joey Prusak. I have corrected the syntax error causing the link to fail. I have serious doubts about the individual's notability but that is not a mattter for FFD. Thincat (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyright violation. I have added a {{db-f9}} template to the file. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. The uploader needs to provide credible evidence that they did indeed take the photo. Thincat (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[1] 10 Great Films Ruined By Terrible Plot Twists, wegotthiscovered.com

[KingKrzywinska2000-2] Geoff King; Tanya Krzywinska (2000). Science Fiction Cinema: From Outerspace to Cyberspace. Wallflower Press. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-903364-03-1.

[Simpson2008-3] Stephen W. Simpson (1 June 2008). What Women Wish You Knew about Dating: A Single Guy's Guide to Romantic Relationships. Baker Books. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-8010-6840-9.

[KapellLawrence2006-4] Matthew Kapell; John Shelton Lawrence (1 January 2006). Finding the Force of the Star Wars Franchise: Fans, Merchandise, & Critics. Peter Lang. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-8204-6333-9.

[Bortolin2012-5] Matthew Bortolin (18 June 2012). The Dharma of Star Wars. Wisdom Publications Inc. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-86171-828-3.

[Booker2006-6] M. Keith Booker (1 January 2006). Alternate Americas: Science Fiction Film and American Culture. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-275-98395-6.

[Walters2011-7] James Walters (1 June 2011). Fantasy Film: A Critical Introduction. Berg. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-84788-842-6.

[BrodeDeyneka2012-8] Douglas Brode; Leah Deyneka (2 July 2012). Sex, Politics, and Religion in Star Wars: An Anthology. Scarecrow Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-0-8108-8515-8.

[Wolverton1995-9] Dave Wolverton (1995). The Courtship of Princess Leia. Random House LLC. ISBN 978-0-553-56937-7.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]