Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 2

< July 1	July 3 >

July 2[edit]

File:Business school foyer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the editors other uploads, expect that this is also copyright of University of Western Australia Business School Mtking (talk) 05:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Side building.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the editors other uploads, expect that this is also copyright of University of Western Australia Business School Mtking (talk) 05:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The UWA Clock Tower.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture is used on the UWA website (here) and the university claims copyright on all information stored on website so nothing to suggest copyright tag is correct. Mtking (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01686effects.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned photograph of a user who only ever made two edits (one uploading this image) three years ago. Acather96 (talk) 07:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the user made more edits - notably to Trost - Australian writer where the picture was used and which was later deleteted as A7 06:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Html.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, not the official logo, should be svg. Totally useless. mabdul 11:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Html.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, no encyclopedic value, low qualitiy mabdul 11:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete makes no sense. Can't read the code, so can't tell what the code is. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 03:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not needed Agathoclea (talk) 06:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mviany-thumb.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan Mvindian (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simon Baron-Cohen 2008 licenced for use.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image is stated to have a time restriction on its licensing and that is not acceptable. I have access to the OTRS ticket that had been received in 2009 and it also states that there is a time restriction. This would mean that if a reuser were to use the file in a book they would supposedly be committing copyright infringement after 2014. This is therefore a non-free file and was understandably changed out of the Simon Baron-Cohen article. I would not have approved the OTRS confirmation had I received the original emails with such restrictions. – Adrignola talk 14:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AbramsLost-1991.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and completely redundant to File:Destroyed M1A1 Abrams.jpg. Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 16:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Interdragsloba.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. The article about the event it relates to was deleted, so I don't see why we'd need this. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JWPCe.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Likely a non-free screenshot. If the software is free, the image is still so low resolution that it seems useless. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Agathoclea (talk) 06:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Huaxi-Far View of Banbianshan.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan and completely redundant to File:Huaxi-Far View of Banbianshan.jpg. Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 16:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mkvsdc logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to complex to be PD-text or the like, and orphaned, so delete per WP:NFCC's minimum use requirement. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nominator, too complex to be PD-text and orphaned. Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 17:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The dragon alone makes this copyrightable and since it is unused, it's gotta go. Buffs (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the uploader's talkpage suggests that it is copyrighted Agathoclea (talk) 06:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mg3wet.JPG.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inferior to File:Mg3wet.JPG because of poor filename and more pixellated license plate. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Riverdales27.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; can't foresee any potential use for this file. Besides, even if we were to need something like it, creating an SVG version should be easy. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete judging by the bottom right corner of File:Riverdalesreissue.jpg is it a kind of band logo, unused though and of murky copyright. Agathoclea (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.