Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Three Views of Taman Sari

Three Views of Taman Sari[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2014 at 01:26:56 (UTC)

The tower from which the Sultan watched his concubines, and one of their bathing pools
Eastern face of the West Gate, the original main entrance; the western face is now blocked by local homes.
Eastern face of the East Gate, through which tourists now enter.

Reason: All are high resolution and good quality. All show a different part of the "water castle" with great detail, and all are well used in the article. Also, all have specific discussion of them in the article.
Articles in which this image appears: Taman Sari (Yogyakarta)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Chris Woodrich

Support as nominator – — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I like those pictures, they are well balaced, good composition, nice harmonizing colours, a good set of pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hafspajen (talk • contribs) 11:41, 23 May 2014‎
Support - Solid images resulting from some very hard work.--Godot13 (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not something that would make me oppose, but the middle image has some blue/purple CA at the uppermost central part of the structure...-Godot13 (talk) 19:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since this passed QI, I think Commons policy is against overwriting it. For something that minor I don't think it's a good idea to upload separately. I'll do it, though, if necessary. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has no policy on overwriting QI or FP. It has a guideline which previously gave some silly advice, but no longer does. Feel absolutely free to correct any CA in your own images. -- Colin°^Talk 21:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, a guideline. Thanks for pointing out the change, Colin. Will try and fix the CA soon — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Colin, Godot13, I believe I have addressed this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice lighting. Good to see quality images added to a GA article. In the third image that info panel is a terrible eyesore for no good reason as it conveys little useful info. They really should have placed it at least a bit lower so it doesn't obscure the diagonal line behind it, but is not the photographer's fault. --ELEKHH^T 07:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason they have a habit of doing that to historical buildings, Candi Asu, for instance (example). Some are not as bothersome; that at Candi Sewu (example) can be ignored as the site is much bigger and offers more angles. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Couldn't review this at full resolution - the Commons Large Image Viewer actually doesn't handle things this large - so I viewed a thumbnail still well over the minimum resolution. If that was a native size, I'd support it, so I'm happy to support the much better image it really is. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tower in Taman Sari, 2014-05-19.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Eastern face of west gate, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta, 2014-04-24 (from 19 images).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Eastern face of Eastern Gate, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta, 2014-05-07.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]