Chris Powell (politician) – Void close. Clearly a WP:BADNAC, The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial.) -- RoySmith(talk) 23:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what's going on here. My intent was to relist the discussion, but the automation seems to be having problems doing that. For now, consider it relisted and I'll try to fix up whatever's wrong. -- RoySmith(talk) 00:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
I believe that the Non-admin close of "Keep" mis-interpreted consensus, and that a redirect had a greater rough consensus than keep. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn and Redirect (NOM - wasn't sure of status of Noms "!voting" in DelRevs, ignore if a "duplicate") - in the AfD there seems to be significantly more consensus in justified !votes for a redirect than for a Keep. I am firmly of the view it wasn't a NC, but it definitely didn't reach justification levels for a keep. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn and re-close I typically don't vote at DRVs if I participated in the AfD, but this is a clear non-admin close violation, and should be reverted and closed by an administrator. SportingFlyertalk 23:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
American Sleep Association – Endorse, but moot. Unanimous agreement that the original deletion and salting in mainspace were correct. However, several people opined that it is OK to try writing a new version in draft space, if the problems found in the AfD are fixed. And indeed, there's already such a draft (which has already been rejected). So, at this point, people can continue to work on the draft and if it's ever accepted, we can worry about the mainspace salt at that time. -- RoySmith(talk) 18:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Apologies for the improper use of syntax above by this newb. This is an article that has been accidentally salted.
What? There are wikipedians who unable to master all the fine points of obtuse template syntax? I'm shocked! I fixed it :-) -- RoySmith(talk) 23:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Expertise and authority where questioned previously. These issues have been resolved by listing the physicians and scientists who are responsible for the content.
- Notability issues have been resolved. A previous notation referenced that was broken-link is now available. Furthermore, there are several notations and references to the organization from respected media sources, academic institutions, and government resources.
- Please note that prior to 2016, there was a domain squatter using the exact same entity name. The domain squatter has since been removed.
Please allow for one of the versions of the article to exist. Thank you. Sleepdoctor1 (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse I don't even know what to write here. SportingFlyertalk 00:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The salting was no accident.You need to provide proof of your other claims, probably in the form of a draft article that clearly overcomes the objections in the AFD, for this to be considered. —Cryptic 04:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse- there was no other way the AfD could have closed, and I don't see anything wrong with the salting. There should be no objection to anyone writing a draft that shows that the previous problems have been overcome though. ReykYO! 11:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse Your comment "Please allow for one of the versions of the article to exist. " plus your username and the way this draft was written collectively suggest some kind of promotional or COI activities. This should remain deleted but may be until when an acceptable version is written and reviewed independently from draft. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
