@Diannaa: According to this, the similarity is 34.2% (< 40%) and was concluded to be "Violation Unlikely". I'm not sure what are you expecting though. The matching parts were French names with 4-5 words long, and very basic English phrases. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We don't go by the percentage from Earwig's tool; it's only a rough guide. In my opinion it's too closeley paraphrased, presenting the same content with only minor alterations to the wording. — Diannaa (talk) 00:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Diannaa: Well, it is understandable that you can't rely on the percentage from Earwig's tool, but the tool does tell you what that matching parts are. Like I mentioned, the matching parts were French names with 4-5 words long, and very basic English phrases. And according to what I'm seeing, there is WP:LIMITED. That's the best I could paraphrase at least for now. I'll let the clerks decide then. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I recently double-checked and noticed that some of the information that this author wrote about the square during the French colonial period was incorrect, so I completely rewrote that paragraph at Talk:Mê Linh Square/Temp, and the perecentage in Earwig's tool was lowered to 15%, I hope that helped. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. — Diannaa (talk) 11:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. — Diannaa (talk) 11:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
