Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 June 10

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)
SCV for 2012-06-10 Edit Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-06-10

Spit (card game) (history · last edit) from [1] (Internet archive link from 2001: [2]) RJaguar3 | u | t 02:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moolia (history · last edit) from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakot The large text here is the same on two articles Moolia and Bakot. It looks like it's been copied from elsewhere but given the typos and grammar it is not clear.. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 15:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved. I've removed the text as regardless of copyrigth status it's unencyclopaedic. --Dpmuk (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bakot (history · last edit) from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moolia The large text here is the same on two articles Moolia and Bakot. It looks like it's been copied from elsewhere but given the typos and grammar it is not clear.. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 15:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved. I've removed the text as regardless of copyrigth status it's unencyclopaedic. --Dpmuk (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dow Air Force Base (history · last edit) from http://www.flybangor.com/content/4044/History/. SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't appear to be a reverse, as the material was in the source prior to the Wikipedia article per Wayback.
- I asked veteran editor BWMoll for help --SPhilbrick (Talk) 20:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't copy this from the website, but merely copied it from the Bangor IAP page when I created the Dow one. Actually, the Dow page should be merged into the Bangor ANGB page, so I merely did this by accident, but and willing to help fix this. I will probably gut the article in the coming days, though. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. User:Bwmoll3 cleaned it up --SPhilbrick (Talk) 22:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- So actually, by that logic, the Bangor IAP article also has an issue. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bangor International Airport (history · last edit) from http://www.flybangor.com/content/4044/History/ Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for pointing that out Kevin. Bwmoll3 rewrote the remaining section that I didn't edit, if you could look at Bangor IAP, it would be appreciated. Note that BWMoll added some nice inline references, which may be relevant for Bangor IAP. (I just realized you weren't the editor of the problematic material in Bangor, but as you are familiar with the subject matter, you may be well suited to clean it up.) --SPhilbrick (Talk) 22:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I just gutted and redirected the page, actually. I might just remove more material on the IAP page, and call it a day, since it is a duplicate. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blowin' the Blues Away (history · last edit) from http://www.allmusic.com/album/blowin-the-blues-away-mw0000245581. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The problematic phrasing was added three years ago, when standards may have been a little more relaxed. I've asked (here) the original editor to take a crack at cleaning it up.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 21:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Quote reduced to length which is more reasonably fair use --Dpmuk (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Dpmuk (talk) 18:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horace-Scope (history · last edit) from http://www.allmusic.com/album/horace-scope-mw0000309056. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- IMO the use of two sentences, a total of 68 words out of the 187 word review, properly quoted and properly referenced, does not constitute an excessive use of material. What do others think?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Considering the size of the article, I'd say it's an issue. That's why I dislike articles which dedicate a whole paragraph to a single review; it leaves the CP door wide open. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Well actually I couldn't find any sources but as was pointed out by the person removing the tag any copying, if there is any, would appear to be from NIH sources, hence PD and not a copyvio concern --Dpmuk (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]