Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

6 November 2010[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-11-06 Edit

2010-11-06 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed copying. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Insta-mirror. Something to keep an eye on. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed intrawiki copying. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed split. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:16, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Also allmusic.com. Pretty comprehensive copying here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've relisted this one. The editor who tagged it has been working on it; there are no sources identified, but he had said he would remove the content. I did a scan and did not find copied content in the current version. If this is true when this comes due, the tag should probably be removed with a note inviting the tagger to identify the source if necessary to restore it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the rest of the text copyvios listed, and Explicit was kind enough to deal with the images. There are undoubtedly more copyvios that should be looked for on other articles edited by this bunch. Doc talk 22:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Doc9871 & Explicit. Note Balubz123 has been indeffed for "block/ban evasion" - 220.101 talk\Contribs 03:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contribution survey for this user:
MER-C 08:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]