Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 13 March 15 >

March 14[edit]

Category:Mosques in Kazakhstan by city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge, only two subcategories in this container category and the parent Category:Mosques in Kazakhstan is even thinner-populated. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Debuts mixtape albums[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 1#Category:Debuts mixtape albums

Milwaukee Wave players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging :
Nominator's rationale: Team's players categories are never separated by league. American Money (talk) 17:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 08:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all - as nom says, we do not have separate categories for clubs depending on what league they played in. GiantSnowman 08:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Needing infoboxes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G8: Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page.
@Gonnym, for future reference these categories need not have been brought to a CFD discussion. They could simply have been tagged with {{Db-g8}} or {{Db-templatecat}}. That would have been less work for everyone. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting
Nominator's rationale: The category documentation only mentions a deleted template. Not sure if this is still used or should be removed. Gonnym (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People permanently banned from Twitter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Way too specific. Are we going to create a cat for every website? Guy Macon (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Years in London[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge per amended nomination. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, only 1 article in each of these categories, and big gaps between the years, which makes navigation between the articles cumbersome. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT For the second target, make it the decades of the century in London (e.g. Category:1740s in London). If these too are too small, they can be the subject of later nominations. Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Laurel Lodged alternative idea. Grutness...wha? 02:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination adapted for the 18th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as amended. There should be enough for decade categories. I suspect this could be carried back into 17th century, but this may depend on whether there is yet enough population. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the Northern Rivers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A far as I can see from the head article Northern Rivers (it's a region of New South Wales, Australia), it doesn't take a definite article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_14&oldid=895081693"