Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Mecelis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Mecelis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Any GNG sources in the article are about the company, not the individual; they don't provide the significant coverage required to meet the standards of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC for a biographical article. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Lithuania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep satisfies WP:GNG there are personal bits (not just mention in passsing) if you search foor his full Lithanian name: Žilvinas Mecelis. - Altenmann >talk 21:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in the article are mentions and an interview, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, NOTINHERITED applies. BEFORE, including searching "Žilvinas Mecelis" turned up sources similar to the articles, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV, the keep vote provides no sources to eval. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 14:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails GNG and all sources are not notable to have its own BLP. Additionally, there is a lack of reliable sources to meet SIGCOV and if there are any, they represent companies instead of the subject of this BLP. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 17:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.