Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorubaland Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. ✗plicit 23:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yorubaland Time

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure what this article is talking about, doesn't clearly say what "Yorubaland Time" is. Sources do not explain that either. Looks like something that is non-existent. Generally doesn't have a WP:SIGCOV, sounds more like an WP:OR. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I searched Google Scholar for the words yoruba + time and turned up 6 potential refs which I've added to a temporary "See also" section. It seems this is a legitimate topic for philosophers and ethnographers. That doesn't mean the academic topic means much to modern day Yorubas. I also agree with Vanderwaalforces this article looks sketchy; we'll see how well it matches these new, more relevant refs.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think think the topic is relevant and notable enough as per the sources provided. Although, I will suggest it be further worked on to show better clarity.

--Mevoelo ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: Entry may be notable but it is currently filled with original researchs and reads like a personal essay. So, draftifying and overhauling would be the best thing to do. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 07:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify this mess. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 07:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.