Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yomi Denzel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yomi Denzel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a non notable Nigerian entrepreneur & “YouTuber” who fails WP:ANYBIO and in general lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus GNG isn’t met either, a before search shows me coverage in unreliable sources without a reputation for fact checking such as this & this. Furthermore they seem to be related to a (notable brother) but unfortunately notability isn’t inherited neither is is acquired by proximity to a notable person. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Figaro article appears to be a paid/sponsored story. The RTS interview seems notable, rts being the Swiss public broadcaster. The French Huffington Post article also appears legit/uses a reliable source. There's one on a website/magazine called "Le Temps" written by someone at rts, seems to have enough French-language sources to meet notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with the caveat that interviews are primary sources, and therefore cannot contribute to notability. The combination of the Huffington Post source and the article in Le Temps seem to be just barely enough to pass GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for the precise reasons mentioned above by Celestina007. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable sources CassiJevenn (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.