Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonthaggi Human Powered Grand Prix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Wonthaggi. MBisanz talk 01:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wonthaggi Human Powered Grand Prix[edit]
- Wonthaggi Human Powered Grand Prix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, a small community event, with no coverage outside its locality. nothing in gnews. and very limited coverage in trove. LibStar (talk) 01:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A search yielded no notable news coverage and it is a small community event. Vacation9 (talk) 14:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The event was covered in detail by ABC News [1], but that's not enough to qualify as significant coverage. The subject does not seem to meet the notability guideline for sports events.--xanchester (t) 15:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Wonthaggi#Tourism. Plausible search term but probably not enough significant coverage to meet the GNG. The-Pope (talk) 00:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Upmerge to Wonthaggi per the Pope - dont delete - SatuSuro 09:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 02:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Barely "non-notable", despite the ABC News source which doesn't qualify as significant reliable coverage for WP:GNG. Possible redirect. TBrandley 03:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. The Wonthaggi article has a mention and a picture of the event. StAnselm (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.