Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Euro Hockey League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 02:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Euro Hockey League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this article technically passes the Google Test, perhaps we should get a consensus on whether or not we should make an exception for Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There are all manner of articles for things (sports leagues included) that never existed or came to fruition, but received enough significant press coverage to meet the GNG. The question to hand is whether those sources exist, not whether this league does. Ravenswing 01:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't follow hockey, but two points: First, is this just a rebranding of EuroHockey Club Champions Cup (women)? The article suggests it may be, so a merge there may be appropriate. Second, this is confirmed to be happening, so there's no crystal ball involved. --Michig (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This does article not fall under Wikipedia is not a crystal ball because there are enough sources saying this will happen and it is confirmed it will happen. Justwagen (talk) 09:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Or perhaps more of a question; why is this sorted into an ice hockey discussion? Is there not a better place to present this so that editors who are more familiar with field hockey can interact with it?18abruce (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is listed in a few places. -DJSasso (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 12:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 12:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 12:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.