Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Nomads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess. Flanaess, as the parent topic, is the clear choice for a redirect target. If material on Wolf Nomads there is removed in the future, the redirect can be taken to RFD as needed. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf Nomads

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've changed my mind, I don't actually support merging this to Flanaess. It should be deleted, and Gran March, Pomarj, Geoff (Greyhawk), and Highfolk should be deleted as well. I'm starting a discussion on Flanaess for reductions on that page. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 23:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless third-party sources are forthcoming. I've no particular opposition to a merge or a redirect if someone believes it useful. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to Flanaess. Ran a search on Wolf Nomads...just a fictional aspect of the D&D universe (the GreyHawke setting). No logic for it to have its own page. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M: no argument that this content has any other deficiency than simple non-notability has been advanced, making the delete arguments non-policy-based: deletion on the basis of non-notability is only for when no suitable merge target exists, which is not the case here. Jclemens (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ and Jclemens. Borderlandor (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would support a consensus redirect to Flanaess. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge. Fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or merge if a suitable target can be identified. No evidence of decent third-party coverage. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.