Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehaven Beach Ocean Swim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Whitehaven Beach. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whitehaven Beach Ocean Swim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed PROD. Article does not meet general notability guidelines as well as guidelines presented in WP:NSPORT and WP:EVENT Barkeep^{Chat | $} 14:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 03:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge There seems to be enough out there to confirm that this is not a hoax. If it currently seems too slight, it would best to merge to Whitehaven Beach or Ocean swimming which are both substantial topics. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could you please pick one. if it is keep it must satisfy a notability guideline. LibStar (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles link to this one. There is no obvious priority. Colonel Warden (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I meant out of keep or merge. LibStar (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are here to decide whether to delete the article and its history or not. Both keep and merge are not-delete cases and so equivalent for our purpose here. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Whitehaven Beach Ocean Swim[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Whitehaven Beach, no seperate notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Merge to Whitehaven Beach, a very short article. Abductive (reasoning) 14:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.